On Wed, Jul 1, 2015 at 8:17 AM, Markus Krötzsch
wrote:
> Dear Pierpaolo,
>
> This thread was only about Julian and Gregorian calendar dates. If and how
> other calendar models should be supported in some future is another
> (potentially big) discussion. As you said, there are many issues there.
>
On 01.07.2015 16:00, Pierpaolo Bernardi wrote:
On Wed, Jul 1, 2015 at 8:17 AM, Markus Krötzsch
wrote:
Dear Pierpaolo,
This thread was only about Julian and Gregorian calendar dates. If and how
other calendar models should be supported in some future is another
(potentially big) discussion. As
Il 30/giu/2015 19:54, "Andrea Zanni" ha scritto:
>
> Hello everyone.
>
> For Italian libraries, you can find a good csv here:
> http://opendata.anagrafe.iccu.sbn.it/territorio.zip
>
> Cristian Consonni also had a project of importing all of them on
> OpenStreetMap:
> https://wiki.openstreetmap.or
Hi, it's first of July and I would like to introduce you a quarterly goal
that the Engineering Community team has committed to:
Establish a framework to engage with data engineers and open data
organizations
https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T101950
We are missing a community framework allowing W
I would find this discussion easier to follow if the Wikidata identifiers
for the various classes and properties were mentioned, and there were
pointers to relevant documentation.
The only Wikidata class or property that I could easily find is Q205892.
It's discussion page, https://www.wikidata.o
Open a new thread for discussion of calendar models in general.
On Wed, Jul 1, 2015 at 4:49 PM, Markus Krötzsch
wrote:
> On 01.07.2015 16:00, Pierpaolo Bernardi wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, Jul 1, 2015 at 8:17 AM, Markus Krötzsch
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Dear Pierpaolo,
>>>
>>> This thread was only about Julia
Hello Quim,
We have in Belgium (as Wikimedia Belgium) a partner organisation who is
together with us working with cultural institutions to get open datasets to
be used in Wikidata.
So yes, we are interested.
Greetings,
Romaine
2015-07-01 17:31 GMT+02:00 Quim Gil :
> Hi, it's first of July and
Hello Quim,
There was always the issue of where to publish datasets from partner
organisations like a http://datahub.io/
Is that being considered in this new iteration?
Cheers,
Micru
On Wed, Jul 1, 2015 at 6:19 PM, Romaine Wiki wrote:
> Hello Quim,
>
> We have in Belgium (as Wikimedia Belgium
On 01.07.2015 18:03, Peter F. Patel-Schneider wrote:
...
Even the very nice email from Markus that gives numbers does not provide any
information on where the numbers come from.
I just ran a simple Java program based on Wikidata Toolkit to count the
date values. The features I used for counti
On 07/01/2015 07:00 AM, Pierpaolo Bernardi wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 1, 2015 at 8:17 AM, Markus Krötzsch
> wrote:
>> Dear Pierpaolo,
>>
>> This thread was only about Julian and Gregorian calendar dates. If and
>> how other calendar models should be supported in some future is
>> another (potentially
On 01.07.2015 18:14, Peter F. Patel-Schneider wrote:
On 07/01/2015 07:00 AM, Pierpaolo Bernardi wrote:
On Wed, Jul 1, 2015 at 8:17 AM, Markus Krötzsch
wrote:
Dear Pierpaolo,
This thread was only about Julian and Gregorian calendar dates. If and
how other calendar models should be supported in
Thanks.
This helps in finding out how to reproduce the numbers.
However, I'm still confused as to how these bits of data are part of the
Wikidata data/knowledge model. Where is the description of
getPreferredCalendarModel, for example?
http://javadox.com/org.wikidata.wdtk/wdtk-datamodel/0.1.0/o
Quim,
I'm not familiar with GLAM or what you are really asking for here. Could
you elaborate a little? Our group is actively engaged in writing bots for
populating wikidata with trusted biomedical information and for using that
information to drive applications such as Wikipedia. Processes for
Peter,
you might be looking for this:
https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Wikibase/DataModel#Dates_and_times
Cheers,
Denny
On Wed, Jul 1, 2015 at 9:48 AM Peter F. Patel-Schneider <
pfpschnei...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Thanks.
>
> This helps in finding out how to reproduce the numbers.
>
> However, I'm
Wouldn't it be better to use iso8601 as internal format?
ons. 1. jul. 2015, 18.45 skrev Markus Krötzsch <
mar...@semantic-mediawiki.org>:
> On 01.07.2015 18:14, Peter F. Patel-Schneider wrote:
> > On 07/01/2015 07:00 AM, Pierpaolo Bernardi wrote:
> >> On Wed, Jul 1, 2015 at 8:17 AM, Markus Krötzs
Hi Quim, Sylvia, Lydia and Wikidatans,
In terms of strategic partnerships with CC Wikidata, and this Wikidata
Engineering
Community project looking for -
"* people that have been in touch with organizations willing to contribute
their open data" -
in what ways could CC World University and Scho
That should be "default calendar model".
My screw up... ;/
ons. 1. jul. 2015, 20.08 skrev John Erling Blad :
> Wouldn't it be better to use iso8601 as internal format?
>
> ons. 1. jul. 2015, 18.45 skrev Markus Krötzsch <
> mar...@semantic-mediawiki.org>:
>
>> On 01.07.2015 18:14, Peter F. Patel-S
On 01.07.2015 20:08, John Erling Blad wrote:
Wouldn't it be better to use iso8601 as internal format?
Yes, that was essentially our original proposal. ISO8601 is a syntax for
proleptic Gregorian dates, so this would be the internal calendar model.
ISO has no such detailed way to specify preci
Thanks. That helps a lot. Is that the way that things are going to be done
in the future, i.e., dates will be stored using the specified calendar model
instead of being converted?
peter
On 07/01/2015 10:52 AM, Denny Vrandečić wrote:
> Peter,
>
> you might be looking for this:
>
> https://www
Thank you very much for this quick and very diverse wave of feedback. I'm
trying to keep the description of https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T101950
up to date, and you are welcome to edit too.
The deliverable of this goal is basically documentation, so the first
question is where should that doc
20 matches
Mail list logo
