Re: [Wikidata] RFC - Primary Sources?

On Tue, Jun 14, 2016 at 1:03 AM Tom Morris wrote: > I'm confused by this from today's Wikidata weekly summary: > >- New request for comments: Semi-automatic Addition of References to >Wikidata Statements - feedback on the Primary Sources Tool > >

Re: [Wikidata] RFC - Primary Sources?

Notifying Marti of this discussion. Pine On Jun 13, 2016 17:07, "rupert THURNER" wrote: > On Tue, Jun 14, 2016 at 1:02 AM, Tom Morris wrote: > >> I'm confused by this from today's Wikidata weekly summary: >> >>- New request for comments: Semi-automatic Addition of References to >>Wikida

Re: [Wikidata] RFC - Primary Sources?

On Tue, Jun 14, 2016 at 1:02 AM, Tom Morris wrote: > I'm confused by this from today's Wikidata weekly summary: > >- New request for comments: Semi-automatic Addition of References to >Wikidata Statements - feedback on the Primary Sources Tool > >

[Wikidata] RFC - Primary Sources?

I'm confused by this from today's Wikidata weekly summary: - New request for comments: Semi-automatic Addition of References to Wikidata Statements - feedback on the Primary Sources Tool

Re: [Wikidata] WikiProjects Languages in Indonesia (Was: Re: Possibility of data lock)

Hi Gerard, This isn't to do with the question of language labels - it's the (separate) issue of which property should be used when defining a language. We currently have 1,388 instances of P31:Q315, and 7,022 of P31:Q34770, without any obvious reason as to why one or the other. https://tools.wmfl

Re: [Wikidata] WikiProjects Languages in Indonesia (Was: Re: Possibility of data lock)

Hoi, What is the point of your advise? What the language committee allows is one dimensional. Dialects are not granted a permit for labels. This only makes sense once we have dictionary functionality. Thanks, GerardM On 13 June 2016 at 18:30, Andrew Gray wrote: > Hi Biyanto, > > I think dis

Re: [Wikidata] WikiProjects Languages in Indonesia (Was: Re: Possibility of data lock)

Hi Biyanto, I think discussing this in English will be hard, as it seems English doesn't split out the different concepts... Going by the French & German, Q315 (Langage \ Sprache) is the abstract concept of language (the ability to convey concepts) and Q34770 (Langue \ Einzelsprachen) is "a langu

Re: [Wikidata] WikiProjects Languages in Indonesia (Was: Re: Possibility of data lock)

Hoi I love it when items are highjacked by a science and leave us with something that is completely ambiguous. Thanks, GerardM On 13 June 2016 at 15:06, Biyanto Rebin wrote: > Thank you Gerard, > I usually leave it empty for the language that I couldn't find. > > Another question, > Wikida

[Wikidata] weekly summary #213

Hey everyone :) Here is your summary of what's been happening around Wikidata over the past week. Discussions - New request for comments: Semi-automatic Addition of References to Wikidata Statements - feedback on the Primary Sources Tool

Re: [Wikidata] WikiProjects Languages in Indonesia (Was: Re: Possibility of data lock)

Thank you Gerard, I usually leave it empty for the language that I couldn't find. Another question, Wikidata have two different item for close term, language in Q315 and language (in linguistics) in Q34770. It's important thing because when I randomly check some of Wikidata using Q315

Re: [Wikidata] WikiProjects Languages in Indonesia (Was: Re: Possibility of data lock)

Hoi, The language committee agreed that recognised languages of the iso 639-3 that indicate single languages may be used without asking on Wikidata. All the rest is not covered and consequently needs permission. A code like no for Norwegian is not accepted for instance (indicating both nn and nb).

Re: [Wikidata] WikiProjects Languages in Indonesia (Was: Re: Possibility of data lock)

What do you mean with permission? Is it regarding with Wikimedia language code? I usually left the ISO 693-3 code if I couldn't find it. Best, 2016-06-11 0:53 GMT+07:00 Gerard Meijssen : > Hoi, > When a language cannot be matched to an ISO-639-3 code, it is necessary to > ask for permission from