Erika,
You might consider using
https://www.artsy.net/article/the-art-genome-project-why-are-all-the-black-artists-sitting-together-in-the-cafeteria
as a ref. There must be something usable there.
From what I've seen it seems that BLT is principally a series of informal
meetings, only some of w
*list moderator hat on"
Folks, can we please have this discussion without calling people names
and so on? Wikidata is supposed to be better than this.
Cheers
Lydia
--
Lydia Pintscher - http://about.me/lydia.pintscher
Product Manager for Wikidata
Wikimedia Deutschland e.V.
Tempelhofer Ufer 23-
Dear Mr. or Ms.,
I thank you for your efforts.
Want to share and discuss your Wikimedia experience with African community?
Need to have African volunteers involved in your Wikimedia project? Like to
explain useful ideas and knowledge to African wikimedians?
It is time to do that. In fact, you can
On 05-01-18 22:55, Jane Darnell wrote:
I object to your use of the catalog property to link to something that
is not a catalog. I don't see why my objection leads you to expect me
to offer an alternative way to track your project. I am not
responsible for your project and don't understand what
I have now created a property proposal for a new property, "Wikidata
focus list", to act as a drop-in replacement for some current uses of P972.
https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Wikidata:Property_proposal/Wikidata_focus_list
Let's sort this thing out.
-- James.
On 06/01/2018 10:40, Maarten Da
On 6 January 2018 at 01:34, Charles Horn wrote:
> As a relatively recent contributor to Wikidata, I have been struggling to
> understand the objections to the Black Lunch Table's use of the catalog
> property and the points of view behind this discussion.
Understandably you may not be aware that
Hoi,
So by changing the venue and determining that another discussion is more
"important" you reduce the relevance of what is happening. You also change
the discussion.
That discussion is already old. That discussion came more or less to a
conclusion. Its conclusion is not accepted by all. So movin
On 6 January 2018 at 14:21, Gerard Meijssen wrote:
> So by changing the venue and determining that another discussion is more
> "important" you reduce the relevance of what is happening. You also change
> the discussion.
Gerard, I have done none of these things, Stop making such
misrepresentatio
Hi Charles,
Thanks for taking the time to try to understand the issues that are being
raised here.
- Wikipedia initiatives need a unique identifier in Wikidata they can use
on Wikidata to tag items to their initiative -- and most importantly run
SPARQL queries on
-- I don't think a Q number will
Hi LeadSongDog,
Yes that is an article that is part of the press list that the Black Lunch
Table has generated
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Meetup/Black_Lunch_Table/Press
Again, not a huge fan of using refs to justify an outreach initiative. Plus
would it be necessary to use this ref t
Yes. This is the crux of the matter, the big question: *"I'm not sure we
should store this kind of data on Wikidata."*
I disagree with "*Point 2 and 3 are for the BLT community to solve.*" In
the interest of transparency, Gerard, myself, and BLT came to and are
coming to the Wikidata community for
On Sat, Jan 6, 2018 at 9:53 AM Brill Lyle wrote:
> Yes. This is the crux of the matter, the big question: *"I'm not sure we
> should store this kind of data on Wikidata."*
>
So, I miss the ideas and mantra we had in Freebase. "some data is better
than no data". It really was FREE in the sense t
Erika,
Well, any authority record for each event could capture location, date, and
links to the invitation and any generated products externally to wiki worlds.
Would that not be constructive in the context of establishing wikidatan
notability?
> On Jan 6, 2018, at 10:42 AM, Brill Lyle wrote
Hoi,
What do you mean by an "invitation" ? I do not see how that applies.
Thanks,
GerardM
On 6 January 2018 at 18:03, LeadSongDog wrote:
> Erika,
> Well, any authority record for each event could capture location, date,
> and links to the invitation and any generated products externally t
These projects all have namespaces on En Wikipedia. If there was consensus
that the projects should have Wikidata namespaces -- if that is something
the community would allow and would embrace, that would be something I
would support doing.
- Erika
*Erika Herzog*
Wikipedia *User:BrillLyle
My understanding of identifiers and authorities is that they come from
established entities, i.e., VIAF contributors
http://www.oclc.org/en/viaf/contributors.html
If we can query off a BLT identifier that would be great. But the task list
items don't have unique identifiers established -- and that
Thank you. This 16 year library veteran is utterly confounded by this
concept of "catalog" (does that make me a bully?). If that was the best
option available at some prior point- repurposing some property for some
new need- all well and good. But it seems clear it was (and is) not a
clear, intuiti
Hoi David,
No you are not a bully. Indeed as you suggested, "catalog" was used because
there was no agreement to be had for a new property. It is why the
repurposing of an existing property was accepted. Having data makes it
easier because it is relatively easy to replace one property (including
qu
18 matches
Mail list logo