Thank you all for the ideas and pointers. Very helpful and much
appreciated!
Best,
-andrew
On Sun, Sep 20, 2020 at 2:28 AM Federico Leva (Nemo)
wrote:
> Andrew Su, 20/09/20 07:21:
> > Is anyone aware of a list of academic articles that use Wikidata?
>
> Manual lists and keyword searches tend t
On Wed, 16 Sep 2020 at 14:53, Lydia Pintscher
wrote:
> And we now have the Property \o/
> https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Property:P8605
Now in Mix'n'match:
https://mix-n-match.toolforge.org/#/catalog/3862
--
Andy Mabbett
@pigsonthewing
http://pigsonthewing.org.uk
___
Awesome, thanks!
How was it done? I like to learn a bit more about the steps.
Egon
On Tue, Sep 22, 2020 at 11:02 AM Andy Mabbett
wrote:
> On Wed, 16 Sep 2020 at 14:53, Lydia Pintscher
> wrote:
>
> > And we now have the Property \o/
> https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Property:P8605
>
> Now in Mix
On Tue, 22 Sep 2020 at 10:13, Egon Willighagen
wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 22, 2020 at 11:02 AM Andy Mabbett
> wrote:
>> Now in Mix'n'match:
>>
>>https://mix-n-match.toolforge.org/#/catalog/3862
> How was it done? I like to learn a bit more about the steps.
In this case, they aheva JSON file,
On Tue, 22 Sep 2020 at 10:01, Andy Mabbett wrote:
> Now in Mix'n'match:
>
>https://mix-n-match.toolforge.org/#/catalog/3862
This has highlighted an issue I've been concerned about for some time;
the lack of granularity in property P1629, "subject item of this
property".
For example, the dat
How will we handle LOD entries for data sets provided by a third party?
For example, Bio2RDF released over time quite a few data sets, each having
a separate entry in the LOD cloud, e.g. Bio2rdf::DrugBank?
Do we create a separate Wikidata item for that? Link it to the Wikidata
item for Drugbank,
On Tue, 22 Sep 2020 at 13:08, Egon Willighagen
wrote:
> Bio2RDF released over time quite a few data sets, each having a separate
> entry in the LOD cloud, e.g. Bio2rdf::DrugBank?
>
> Do we create a separate Wikidata item for that? Link it to the Wikidata item
> for Drugbank, so that one databas
Andy,
It looks like P3348 is not actually filled out completely and a bit
incorrectly to my eyes.
1. Wouldn't "National Library of Greece" be instead represented by "issued
by" P2378, instead of P1629? Look at the properties for the type
https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q18614948
2. Secondly, what
On Tue, 22 Sep 2020 at 14:47, Thad Guidry wrote:
> It looks like P3348 is not actually filled out completely and a bit
> incorrectly to
> my eyes.
>
> 1. Wouldn't "National Library of Greece" be instead represented by "issued by"
> P2378, instead of P1629? Look at the properties for the type
>
