On Sat, May 4, 2013 at 6:13 PM, Jan Kučera kozuc...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
will this be implemented? Sounds like a reasonable feature to me... Maybe it
could be actually prohibited to locally specify (or actually override) a
name of Wikidata item in certain Wwikidata viewing language if that
On Mon, May 6, 2013 at 11:01 AM, Mathieu Stumpf
psychosl...@culture-libre.org wrote:
Now to give my own opinion of the representation/ontology you are building,
I would say that it's based on exactly the opposite premisses I would use.
Wikidata Q1 is universe, then you have earth, life, death
Le 2013-05-06 11:14, Lydia Pintscher a écrit :
On Mon, May 6, 2013 at 11:01 AM, Mathieu Stumpf
psychosl...@culture-libre.org wrote:
Now to give my own opinion of the representation/ontology you are
building,
I would say that it's based on exactly the opposite premisses I
would use.
Wikidata Q1
Hi Mathieu,
I think the DBpedia mailing list is a better place for discussing the
DBpedia ontology:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dbpedia-discussion
Drop us a message if you have questions or concerns. I'm sure someone
will answer your questions. I am not an ontology expert, so
Heya folks :)
We've created https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata-tech
to keep all the development discussions around Wikidata in one public
place. Feel free to subscribe if you are interested.
Cheers
Lydia
--
Lydia Pintscher - http://about.me/lydia.pintscher
Community
Yes, there is and should be more than one ontology, and that is already the
case with categories, which are so flexible they can loop around and become
their own grandfather.
Dbpedia complaints should be discussed on that list, I am not a dbpedia user,
though I think it's a useful project to
I agree they are extremely useful for many scenarios already. Earlier today I
sorted the human proteins category by popularity, and by reading the articles
for the most popular ones that I didn't know I felt like I was browsing the
table of contents of a live molecular biology book that was
Michael, that's really closely in line with what I was thinking. Why
don't you take a crack at improving
http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Talk:Beyond_categories?
I am not sure if this is just a crazy pipe dream or not, but I can't
help but be a little bit excited at the possibility that it might
I added a section for Wikidata query potential. I'd estimate we've imported
about 1/4 to 1/3 of the data we'd need to start getting comparable results for
a significant number of categories. I think we should iterate on the query
prototype considering scenarios where you link to an existing
