@David:
I think you should have a look to fuzzy logic
https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q224821 :)
2014-05-29 1:48 GMT+02:00 David Cuenca dacu...@gmail.com:
Markus,
On Thu, May 29, 2014 at 12:53 AM, Markus Krötzsch
mar...@semantic-mediawiki.org wrote:
This is an easy question once you have
On 29/05/14 12:41, Thomas Douillard wrote:
@David:
I think you should have a look to fuzzy logic
https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q224821:)
Or at probabilistic logic, possibilistic logic, epistemic logic, ...
it's endless. Let's first complete the data we are sure of before we
start to discuss
hehe, maybe some kind inferences can lead to a good heuristic to suggest
properties and values in the entity suggester. As they naturally become
softer and softer by combination of uncertainties, this could also
provide some kind of limits for inferences by fixing a probability below
which we
** Apologies for cross-posting **
2nd International Workshop on
(Document) Changes: Modeling, Detection, Storage and Visualization
http://diff.cs.unibo.it/dchanges2014/
Part of ACM DocEng
On 29/05/14 13:53, Thomas Douillard wrote:
hehe, maybe some kind inferences can lead to a good heuristic to suggest
properties and values in the entity suggester. As they naturally become
softer and softer by combination of uncertainties, this could also
provide some kind of limits for
David,
I need to answer to your first assertion separately:
On 29/05/14 01:48, David Cuenca wrote:
Well, our goal it to gather the whole human knowledge, not to use it.
No, that is really not the case. Our goal is to gather carefully
selected parts of the human knowledge. Our community
The other answers, under the original subject:
On 29/05/14 01:48, David Cuenca wrote:
Settled :) Let's leave it at defined as a trait of
I don't think it is very clear what the intention of this property is.
What are the limits of its use? What is it meant to do? Can behaviour
really be a
One other issue to bear in mind: it's *simple* to have properties as a
separate thing. I have been following this discussion with some
interest but... well, I don't think I'm particularly stupid, but most
of it is completely above my head.
Saying here are items, here are a set of properties you
Héhé, the Wikidata game suggest it may be a little bit too complicated and
better abstracted away by a three button game for mass contribution :)
2014-05-29 21:04 GMT+02:00 Andrew Gray andrew.g...@dunelm.org.uk:
One other issue to bear in mind: it's *simple* to have properties as a
separate
