Le 2013-08-09 13:04, Romaine Wiki a écrit :
Are there much users from Wiktionary in Hong Kong? I do not think any
of the Dutch users is, I can't say for others.
I think it would be essential that this subject is discussed inside
the wider Wiktionary community. To me the group of users
I'll
just
leave it at that.
JC
On 6 May 2013 11:01, Mathieu Stumpf psychosl...@culture-libre.org
wrote:
Le 2013-05-06 00:09, Jona Christopher Sahnwaldt a écrit :
On 5 May 2013 20:48, Mathieu Stumpf
psychosl...@culture-libre.org wrote:
Le dimanche 05 mai 2013 à 16:28 +0200, Jona Christopher
Le 2013-05-06 20:08, Paul A. Houle a écrit :
From my viewpoint, biases are an issue of statistical sampling.
It's not just the sampling which matter, how you process them to infer
conclusions is just as important. Except in the case of an hypotetical
clone army where each clone lived
Le 2013-05-06 11:14, Lydia Pintscher a écrit :
On Mon, May 6, 2013 at 11:01 AM, Mathieu Stumpf
psychosl...@culture-libre.org wrote:
Now to give my own opinion of the representation/ontology you are
building,
I would say that it's based on exactly the opposite premisses I
would use.
Wikidata Q1
Le 2013-05-02 12:11, Gatien Bovyn a écrit :
Ce site vient de passer sur un canal IRC, ça pourrait en intéresser :
il propose d'entendre la prononciation d'un mot dans une langue, et
il
est possible de contribuer.
http://fr.forvo.com/ [1]
La langue du jour est l'italien, pour ceux que la
Le 2013-04-06 20:31, Luca Martinelli a écrit :
Plus, just a note about seeing an item as of 2011. If I try to see
what an article looked at that time and if a template in the meantime
has been substituted and deleted, I'd see only a red mark stating
Template:Whatever instead of that template. In
Le 2013-04-08 15:02, Luca Martinelli a écrit :
What I tried to say is: we don't mind if we go back in a page history
and find a red link to a template, nobody cares, because we all know
that a template has been deleted/substituted *for a reason* - that we
even discussed for a VERY long time.
Le 2013-04-08 15:54, Luca Martinelli a écrit :
2013/4/8 Mathieu Stumpf psychosl...@culture-libre.org:
Le 2013-04-08 15:02, Luca Martinelli a écrit :
What I tried to say is: we don't mind if we go back in a page
history
and find a red link to a template, nobody cares, because we all
know
Le 2013-04-05 09:32, Gregor Hagedorn a écrit :
On 4 April 2013 22:23, Michael Hale hale.michael...@live.com wrote:
trench, then I just want to update it on Wikidata, and then every
article
that references it will be updated. I don't want to have to update
it on
Wikidata and then go do a null
Le 2013-03-22 14:27, Guillaume Paumier a écrit :
Hi,
Below are the current solutions I'm seeing to move forward; I'd love
to get some feedback as to what people think would be the best way to
proceed.
Note that your solutions are not exclusives, we may as well chose to
distribute ressources
Le 2013-03-14 19:30, Michael Hale a écrit :
In general, I do like the idea of periodically collecting article
references into Wikidata. They are a type of structured data that is
associated with every article, and there are lots of interesting
queries that would be easier to do if that
Le 2013-03-15 13:16, Thomas Douillard a écrit :
2013/3/15 Mathieu Stumpf psychosl...@culture-libre.org
Le 2013-03-14 19:38, Michael Hale a écrit :
A topic I've been involved in recently regards statistics for gun
violence in the US. The government publishes a big report every
year
Le 2013-03-14 02:09, Michael Hale a écrit :
I think of Wikidata as the symbiotic version of Freebase. I won't say
Freebase is a parasite, but I think a core aspect of Wikidata is that
edits to the database will often feed back into the encyclopedia in
various places. I haven't looked too much at
Hello,
First, congratulation for all the already achieved great work on the
wikidata project.
Now I would be interested to know more about future development,
especially on interactions with wiktionaries.
I think wikidata could help to improve wiktionaries drastically, by
unifying not only
Hello, I'm trying to add fr, lucidité to Q1743823, but I get the
error :
Edit not allowed: Le lien du site [[frwiki:Lucidité]] est déjà utilisé
par l'objet [[Q3265229]].
And that's right, but it seems like a doublet. How do you merge
articles? It would improve UX if the error message would
Le 2013-02-05 15:58, Lydia Pintscher a écrit :
On Tue, Feb 5, 2013 at 3:26 PM, Nicholas Humfrey
nicholas.humf...@bbc.co.uk wrote:
This is fantastic :) you are making amazingly fast progress!
Thank you!
I have been trying to assign the 'is a' property to David Cameron:
16 matches
Mail list logo
