Re: [Wikidata-l] A common, open access, human and computer readable data pool for scientist

2012-04-05 Thread Oren Bochman
If Wikidata’s community rejects your data it would take lab IT person about an hour to set up your own Wikidata in your lab. Since linked data is supposed to be distributed this would be a public part of the web but still under your control it would be easy to integrate with other projects.

Re: [Wikidata-l] A common, open access, human and computer readable data pool for scientist

2012-04-04 Thread Oren Bochman
My 2 cents I have give the subject of academic wiki some thought in the last 6 months. I mean a wiki that could replace the paper journal and its publisher. But it would need a different collaboration model, In any sense that affects thier income the Academia is quite conservative - almost backwar

Re: [Wikidata-l] Notability in Wikidata

2012-04-02 Thread Oren Bochman
problem. To get it out as to ar...zu.Wikpedias without causing chaos -- is what we are here to figure out. -- Bináris Oren Bochman MediaWiki Search Developer. ___ Wikidata-l mailing list Wikidata-l@lists.wikimedia.org https

Re: [Wikidata-l] Notability in Wikidata

2012-04-02 Thread Oren Bochman
ts own criteria of Notability, since it requires its own noise filter. 2. Wiktionary's is just as difficult as Wikipedia. I suggest that newcomers try to study about how Wikipedia works so that we can have a more productive dialogue and WikiData will be accepted. Oren Bochman

Re: [Wikidata-l] Archiving references for facts?

2012-04-01 Thread Oren Bochman
ollow" directive from links to high WP:RS partners. I hope this help. Oren Bochman. MediaWiki Search Developer. From: wikidata-l-boun...@lists.wikimedia.org [mailto:wikidata-l-boun...@lists.wikimedia.org] On Behalf Of John Erling Blad Sent: Sunday, April 01, 2012 10:01 PM To