5 at 1:17 PM, Smolenski Nikola wrote:
> > Citiranje Jo :
> > > What you get on a Wiktionary page is a description of words in several
> > > languages with that particular spelling. Of course 1 spelling can also
> be
> > > several words in 1 language already.
>
just be a disambiguation page? This would be easier for Wiktionary
readers, writers and for linking with Wikidata.
> 2015-05-07 12:03 GMT+02:00 Smolenski Nikola :
>
> > Citiranje Gerard Meijssen :
> > > The interwiki links to Wiktionary are from an interwiki point of view
&
Citiranje Gerard Meijssen :
> The interwiki links to Wiktionary are from an interwiki point of view
> EXTREMELY easy to do. The problem with those links is that they cannot be
> uniquely linked to existing items to Wikidata and thereby it becomes
> unrealistic to do it in a meaningful way at this t
Citiranje Erik Moeller :
> Have we considered separating in some way (in the UI, and possibly the data
> model) properties which track identifiers in external databases vs.
> properties that describe the item using Wikidata-internal links? As more
> and more external identifiers are added, it's eas
Citiranje Thad Guidry :
> I think a simple naming convention would suffice (and clean up the existing
> ones): ID such as for example:
>
> CANTIC ID
> Freebase ID
> Munzinger IBA ID
> NLP ID
> dmoz ID
> Oxford Biography Index ID
> SELIBR ID
How would you name ISBN, for example? ISBN ID? :)
_
Citiranje Lydia Pintscher :
> We can't really just put the link to the non existent article into the
> Wikidata item because the article might be created and then cover a
> completely unrelated topic. We already have this problem with red links on
> Wikipedia but it would be even worse on Wikidata.
Citiranje "Amir E. Aharoni" :
> TL;DR: How can a red link be annotated in a semantic way with a foreign
> article title or a Wikidata Q item number?
>
> Imagine: I'm writing a Wikipedia article in Russian. There's a red link in
> it. I don't have time to write the target article for that link now,
Citiranje Derric Atzrott :
> I do think though that having something like what you describe happen is
> more
> of a user error though. Can you think of any possible Q(something) that
Right now, since only linking to articles is allowed, and only one article can
be linked from anywhere on Wikidata
Citiranje James Heald :
> On 22/10/2014 14:23, Smolenski Nikola wrote:
> > Citiranje James Heald :
> >> (1) There would be no change to the item structure on Wikidata in any
> >> way -- no change to the values of any of the item properties -- only
> >> some e
Citiranje James Heald :
> (1) There would be no change to the item structure on Wikidata in any
> way -- no change to the values of any of the item properties -- only
> some extra sitelinks.
>
> So I don't see *why* you think there would be any risk to Wikidata's
> "own integrity".
Interesting
Citiranje James Heald :
> (1) There would be no change to the item structure on Wikidata in any
> way -- no change to the values of any of the item properties -- only
> some extra sitelinks.
>
> So I don't see *why* you think there would be any risk to Wikidata's
> "own integrity".
Interesting
Citiranje Jane Darnell :
> nope
I am, for example
https://sr.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D0%94%D1%83%D0%B1%D0%B8%D0%BD%D0%B0 has an
interwiki to a redirect. What happens when you try it?
> On Tue, Oct 14, 2014 at 6:23 PM, Smolenski Nikola wrote:
>
> > Citiranje Jane Darnell :
> >
Citiranje Jane Darnell :
> 2) There is no way of making an interwikilink for a redirect, and the
> German Wikipedia's "afrikanische Pflaume" is currently a redirect to
> "Prunus"
You should still be able to make an interwiki link for a redirect the old way,
are you not?
Citiranje Lydia Pintscher :
> On Sat, Sep 6, 2014 at 12:51 PM, Thomas Douillard
> wrote:
> As for simply allowing sitelinks to non-existing articles in Wikidata:
> I fear we can't easily do that. If someone adds the link to a specific
> item and then another person comes and creates an article und
14 matches
Mail list logo
