Joe Szilagyi wrote:
On Thu, Jan 8, 2009 at 8:41 AM, Sam Korn wrote:
On Thu, Jan 8, 2009 at 11:48 AM, Wilhelm Schnotz wrote:
To ray, you have a point, if it is a 3rd parties copyright, it is
their fight. Generally though I don't like the thought of that ability
being used to undelete
Wilhelm Schnotz wrote:
Bah forgive me, I was trying to be sarcastic. Did not work so well :S
People here can sometimes be victims of their own literalism. One thing
about lynch mob members is that they believe they are ridding the world
of scum. Such true believers do not understand
There may very well be a difference, but any way you look at it that
admin did violate copyright. One thing I did notice is this happened
over a year ago, as such I'm not totally convinced now that revoking
the bit will do much good.
Regardless I doubt there is much more to be said here, as there
Carcharoth wrote:
On Thu, Jan 8, 2009 at 3:06 PM, Angela Anuszewski
angela.anuszew...@gmail.com wrote:
Excuse my ignorance, but excatly what is Private Eye?
I looked it up in a handy online encyclopedia...
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Private_Eye
Hmm, the article seems a
http://www.mindhacks.com/blog/2009/01/bullshit_blue_monday.html
- d.
___
WikiEN-l mailing list
WikiEN-l@lists.wikimedia.org
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
