Win-win, and community consensus can decide the reliance to place on their
newly written source v. other sources that existed.
FT2
On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 8:53 PM, Fred Bauder fredb...@fairpoint.net wrote:
High motivation for making decent open-source images available:
On Fri, 4 Feb 2011 13:25:17 + (GMT), wikien-l-Andreas Kolbe
wrote:
and she admits she thought it was a weird religion - - until she
met Cruise. I'm not saying that I'm not a Scientologist because I
think something's wrong with Scientology -- I want to be really
clear about that, Jada
On Fri, 4 Feb 2011 13:25:17 + (GMT), wikien-l-Andreas Kolbe
wrote:
and she admits she thought it was a weird religion - - until she
met Cruise. I'm not saying that I'm not a Scientologist because I
think something's wrong with Scientology -- I want to be really
clear about that, Jada
10 controversial Wikipedia topics:
http://www.deseretnews.com/top/97/10-controversial-Wikipedia-topics.html
Wiki Wars: In battle to define beliefs, Mormons and foes wage battle on
Wikipedia:
http://www.deseretnews.com/article/700105517/
Fred
___
This encyclopedia has been rated as C-Class on the project's quality scale.
This encyclopedia has been checked against the following criteria for
B-Class status:
1. Referencing and citation: criterion not met (many common
articles are not adequately referenced)
2. Coverage and accuracy:
{{sofixit}} :)
On Sun, Feb 13, 2011 at 10:16 PM, Ian Woollard ian.wooll...@gmail.comwrote:
This encyclopedia has been rated as C-Class on the project's quality scale.
This encyclopedia has been checked against the following criteria for
B-Class status:
1. Referencing and citation:
On Sun, Feb 13, 2011 at 8:16 PM, Ian Woollard ian.wooll...@gmail.comwrote:
I therefore award the Wikipedia class C:
Considering that 55% of articles are stubs and 21% are start awarding
Wikipedia a C overall is quite generous.
--
Brian Mingus
Graduate student
Computational Cognitive
I say it's start class at best.
On Sun, Feb 13, 2011 at 10:23 PM, Brian J Mingus
brian.min...@colorado.edu wrote:
On Sun, Feb 13, 2011 at 8:16 PM, Ian Woollard ian.wooll...@gmail.comwrote:
I therefore award the Wikipedia class C:
Considering that 55% of articles are stubs and 21% are start
On 14/02/2011, Newyorkbrad newyorkb...@gmail.com wrote:
{{sofixit}} :)
fixin' the Wikipedia - brb
--
-Ian Woollard
___
WikiEN-l mailing list
WikiEN-l@lists.wikimedia.org
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit:
Can we at least agree it's High-importance?
Newyorkbrad
On Sun, Feb 13, 2011 at 10:16 PM, Ian Woollard ian.wooll...@gmail.comwrote:
This encyclopedia has been rated as C-Class on the project's quality scale.
This encyclopedia has been checked against the following criteria for
B-Class
On 14/02/2011, Brian J Mingus brian.min...@colorado.edu wrote:
Considering that 55% of articles are stubs and 21% are start awarding
Wikipedia a C overall is quite generous.
I think you can't take the simple percentages of articles, a lot of
the most important and well visited articles are
I would think that percentages of FA/GA/A/B/C/Start/Stub with respect
to page hits would be much more illuminating.
Ooh, I'd like to see that. And to get a list of pages that are well
below par considering their popularity.
Steve
___
WikiEN-l
12 matches
Mail list logo
