-Brock
On Thu, Oct 14, 2010 at 8:47 PM, Guettarda guetta...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Oct 14, 2010 at 3:26 PM, George Herbert george.herb...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Thu, Oct 14, 2010 at 1:11 PM, Ian Woollard ian.wooll...@gmail.com
wrote:
On 13/10/2010, George Herbert
I can't believe this idea is being seriously presented. We are an
Encyclopedia. That is one of the Five Pillars ([[WP:5P]]). The job of a
comprehensive encyclopedia is to facilitate access to information in an
efficient manner. Putting extra barriers in front of that means you aren't
looking at it
On Sun, Aug 30, 2009 at 8:31 PM, Carcharoth carcharot...@googlemail.comwrote:
On Mon, Aug 31, 2009 at 4:10 AM, Brianbrian.min...@colorado.edu wrote:
On Sun, Aug 30, 2009 at 9:08 PM, Carcharoth carcharot...@googlemail.com
wrote:
snip
Is it not more likely that most long-term editors who
The 'deletionists' (and I use that word somewhat ironically, we don't have
meetings or leaders or even a philosophy beyond 'improve the encyclopedia')
vs the 'inclusionists' (I always thought that word was chosen as a catch-all
to cast the other side as slightly evil, much like you can't help but
On Sun, Dec 28, 2008 at 6:58 AM, Carcharoth carcharot...@googlemail.comwrote:
On Sun, Dec 28, 2008 at 2:29 PM, Phil Sandifer snowspin...@gmail.com
wrote:
snip
So basically, we have a phrase that mandates the violation of NPOV on
a host of articles, that was inserted without discussion,
