rrect (no, I haven't looked up to
> see whether some genius has changed the definition of stub). I've never
> taken much notice of what is and isn't denominated a stub.
In fact (and to return to the original topic ;)), I would argue that Steve's
comprehensive two-parag
t's
nice when there is a consensus view of what a given infobox should say; it's
less nice when the people who populate the infoboxes have different interests
and values from you.
Cheers,
--
Mark Gallagher
0439 704 975
http://formonelane.net/
"Even potatoes have their bad day
t's
nice when there is a consensus view of what a given infobox should say; it's
less nice when the people who populate the infoboxes have different interests
and values from you.
Cheers,
--
Mark Gallagher
0439 704 975
http://formonelane.net/
"Even potatoes have their bad day
e impenetrable writing.
Quoting Derrida can be likened to pouring oil on troubled fires.
Phil has hinted at it, but the primary reason we should be able to summarise
and rephrase the words of humanities experts is that if we don't, our articles
won't make any gosh-darned sense ...
C
e to talk about global warming,
heat death of the universe, whatever --- is to be elevating a badly-written
policy above common sense. Again.
--
Mark Gallagher
0439 704 975
http://formonelane.net/
"Even potatoes have their bad days, Igor." --- Count Duckula
___
