G'day Will, > In a message dated 12/17/2008 1:16:27 PM Pacific Standard Time, > writes: > Short of simply quoting Derrida verbatim, there is very little that > > can be gleaned from Derrida without any specialist knowledge.>> > --------------- > Then why be short? > Quote him. > If you want the general reader to agree on your summary of Derida's > belief > on A, then quote Derida discussing A.
I don't know if you've looked at our articles discussing deconstructionism lately, but the absolute *last thing* we need is more impenetrable writing. Quoting Derrida can be likened to pouring oil on troubled fires. Phil has hinted at it, but the primary reason we should be able to summarise and rephrase the words of humanities experts is that if we don't, our articles won't make any gosh-darned sense ... Cheers, -- Mark Gallagher 0439 704 975 http://formonelane.net/ "Even potatoes have their bad days, Igor." --- Count Duckula _______________________________________________ WikiEN-l mailing list WikiEN-l@lists.wikimedia.org To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
