After the past week or so, I think we're at the sinking into the
moss stage. Maybe putting out a few roots.
--
Peter in Canberra
___
WikiEN-l mailing list
WikiEN-l@lists.wikimedia.org
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit:
As a Queensland schoolboy, I watched the Apollo 11 landing on 21 July
1969, received through Australia's radio telescopes at Parkes and
Honeysuckle Creek, while at the same instant it was late on 20 July
1969 for the American audience basking in a glow of rightful pride.
Perhaps Jimmy was playing
On Mon, Jan 17, 2011 at 11:50 AM, wiki doc.wikipe...@ntlworld.com wrote:
I don't think it helps to characterise any simple questioning of the leader
as a deranged vendetta.
I thought Tony was merely engaging in some gentle self-criticism.
--
Peter in Canberra
On Fri, Jan 14, 2011 at 8:10 PM, wiki doc.wikipe...@ntlworld.com wrote:
Wikipedia becomes more like religion every day.
With a God-King in a cloud realm and the occasional crucifixion. Not
to mention passing the plate on a regular basis.
I think it is important that we don't develop the same
On Fri, Oct 15, 2010 at 3:47 PM, Guettarda guetta...@gmail.com wrote:
Reality has a liberal bias doesn't mean that liberals are right. Rather,
it means that any attempt to represent reality will, in the eyes of American
conservatives, amount to displaying a liberal bias.
That should only be
On Mon, Feb 9, 2009 at 12:58 PM, K. Peachey p858sn...@yahoo.com.au wrote:
All White Cat is saying is that the wikipedia needs markup(s) to
handle dates. And in fact, right now there are multiple markups
available, including American-style ones.
Thats not mark up, what your describing is
On Mon, Feb 9, 2009 at 1:32 PM, K. Peachey p858sn...@yahoo.com.au wrote:
What is frustrating is the demands from some chauvinists that American
dates be used in non-American articles. France uses International
format dates (14 July 1789),
But were not all american so they shouldn't be used,
On Tue, Jan 20, 2009 at 1:20 AM, Wily D wilydoppelgan...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Jan 17, 2009 at 9:35 PM, Skyring skyr...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Jan 18, 2009 at 11:16 AM, Delirium delir...@hackish.org wrote:
Delirium wrote:
... strongly discourage edits that change one to
another, unless
or
stick with the existing format. You know, like we do for ENGVAR for
spelling.
As to Arbcom cases over date formats, could you point me to a recent
case, please?
Peter
On 1/19/09, Skyring skyr...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Jan 20, 2009 at 1:20 AM, Wily D wilydoppelgan...@gmail.com wrote
to review it. Its the
same preference style thing.
On 1/19/09, Skyring skyr...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Jan 20, 2009 at 3:33 AM, Wilhelm Schnotz wilh...@nixeagle.org
wrote:
The problem is picking the correct one involves lots of drama and
arbcom cases. Drama that we did not have before
On Sun, Jan 18, 2009 at 4:36 PM, Delirium delir...@hackish.org wrote:
Skyring wrote:
There's very little debate on which date format should be used for
articles on U.S. or UK subjects, but for articles on (say) France or
Brazil, there is a push to use U.S. date format, despite both of those
On Sun, Jan 18, 2009 at 11:16 AM, Delirium delir...@hackish.org wrote:
Delirium wrote:
... strongly discourage edits that change one to
another, unless the article's strongly associated with a specific
English-speaking country where one dialect predominates.
I'm puzzled here. Why is it only
12 matches
Mail list logo
