Re: [WikiEN-l] Announcement: Survey study on the categorization of contributors to Wikipedia

2011-02-22 Thread Jeroen Kleijn
Hello, If you all agree with the survey I still would like to post the following message on the list. I really need some more response. Regards, Jeroen Dear all, I'm a Master student and currently busy with my thesis concerning Wikipedia. This survey is part of a Master Thesis research projec

Re: [WikiEN-l] Announcement: Survey study on the categorization of contributors to Wikipedia

2011-02-20 Thread Bob the Wikipedian
Well, as far as anon veterans go, I can't think of any specific ones offhand (but that's mainly due to the anonymity of it all!) but I encounter one every so often. I'm curious what inspires some Wikipedians to remain anonymous for several years, refusing to ever register, and requesting edits

Re: [WikiEN-l] Announcement: Survey study on the categorization of contributors to Wikipedia

2011-02-20 Thread Jeroen Kleijn
Hi, Thank you for your advise and (very interesting) material. The reason for not carrying out another survey is that I need more responses on the same questions and therefore I would like to ask the listmembers for help. I want to collect more than 50 responses for my survey (currently I'm on

Re: [WikiEN-l] Announcement: Survey study on the categorization of contributors to Wikipedia

2011-02-18 Thread WereSpielChequers
Hi Jeroen, you might also want to look at some of the forks of Wikipedia such as Citizendium and Conservapedia and see how "successful" they have been with their policies of restricting IP editing and even pseudonymous editing. Also there was some discussion about this on the Strategy project. For

Re: [WikiEN-l] Announcement: Survey study on the categorization of contributors to Wikipedia

2011-02-18 Thread Bob the Wikipedian
The first survey's fine. :-) I'm merely suggesting you put out a second survey once this one's harvested. The second survey, of course, would focus more on exploring what we like about anonymity, as you've indicated you're seeing that unexpected trend. Sorry for the confusion! God bless, Bob

Re: [WikiEN-l] Announcement: Survey study on the categorization of contributors to Wikipedia

2011-02-17 Thread Jeroen Kleijn
Hi, Thanks for the quick reply. Do you mean that you are waiting on a new URL of the survey? I have edited the currenct survey so the URL given in my first email is still correct. Do I need to post the full message again before publishing (on the list), or will this be done by the moderators of

Re: [WikiEN-l] Announcement: Survey study on the categorization of contributors to Wikipedia

2011-02-17 Thread Bob the Wikipedian
Mr. Kleijn-- Sounds like a followup survey's in order, then, and I'd be more than willing to participate. I won't hold the question's format against you-- questionnaires are very difficult to write without leading the questionnee. God bless, Bob On 2/17/2011 6:44 AM, Jeroen Kleijn wrote: > He

Re: [WikiEN-l] Announcement: Survey study on the categorization of contributors to Wikipedia

2011-02-17 Thread Jeroen Kleijn
Hello, At first: thank you for replying. I've checked the grammar of the survey and made some corrections in the introduction. Although I can't see any grammar errors in the questions. Concerning your second point about vandalism I agree. The results (I've launched the survey last sunday) show

Re: [WikiEN-l] Announcement: Survey study on the categorization of contributors to Wikipedia

2011-02-14 Thread michael west
On 13 February 2011 16:47, Jeroen Kleijn wrote: > Dear all, > > I'm a Master student and currently busy with my thesis concerning > Wikipedia. This survey is part of a Master Thesis research project which > investigates the effects of the increasing participation at reliability of > Wikipedia. Th

[WikiEN-l] Announcement: Survey study on the categorization of contributors to Wikipedia

2011-02-14 Thread Jeroen Kleijn
Dear all, I'm a Master student and currently busy with my thesis concerning Wikipedia. This survey is part of a Master Thesis research project which investigates the effects of the increasing participation at reliability of Wikipedia. The survey is designed to collect information that will help