Amory Meltzer wrote:
> These users are for more likely to be involved in perhaps the more
> Wikipedia-esque aspects (AfD, NFC, all the other Three-Letter
> Acronyms) and are probably yes, inherently more likely to be more
> comfortable online. Compare that to 70 students who spend their
> comparab
Summary: "Geeks use computers". This passes for insight?
-Durova
On Sat, Jun 27, 2009 at 6:46 PM, wrote:
> In a message dated 6/27/2009 6:37:43 PM Pacific Daylight Time,
> wjhon...@aol.com writes:
>
>
> >
> > How dare you! Go away and be quiet!
> >
> > On a lighter note, I've never met anyone
In a message dated 6/27/2009 6:37:43 PM Pacific Daylight Time,
wjhon...@aol.com writes:
>
> How dare you! Go away and be quiet!
>
> On a lighter note, I've never met anyone I couldn't piss off.
>
> Will "grumpy" Johnson>>
> --
Wait a moment.
I think maybe I've confused "grum
In a message dated 6/27/2009 3:20:47 PM Pacific Daylight Time,
michaeldavi...@comcast.net writes:
> Wikipedians are generally "grumpy," "disagreeable," and "closed to new
> ideas."'>>
-
How dare you! Go away and be quiet!
On a lighter note, I've never met anyone I couldn't
Well I for one don't like it! *HMPH!*
That being said, the roughtype article kind of sensationalizes the
results. Matching test subjects simply by internet usage doesn't
really cut it. Picking 69 wikipedians will likely inherently skew the
results. The researchers would have to specifically fi
Very appropriate to this discussion.
MR
--
From: Eddie Tejeda
Reply-To: Wikimedia Foundation Mailing List
Date: Sat, 27 Jun 2009 14:57:44 -0700
To: Wikimedia Foundation Mailing List
Subject: [Foundation-l] "antisocial production"
'Forget altruism. Misanthropy and egotism are the fuel o
