On Mon, Dec 14, 2009 at 11:32 AM, Peter Coombe
thewub.w...@googlemail.com wrote:
The portal doesn't select from all featured articles, only those that
have been on the main page.
I do agree that the Featured Content portal is under-promoted though
(in fact portals generally are)
Yes, I don't
2009/12/14 Steve Bennett stevag...@gmail.com:
Yes, I don't really understand the decision taken on en not to show
portals on article pages. On fr, for example, if you read a chemistry
article, there's a Chemistry Portal banner at the bottom of the
page. It works quite well.
...there's such a
On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 1:02 AM, Andrew Gray andrew.g...@dunelm.org.uk wrote:
2009/12/14 Steve Bennett stevag...@gmail.com:
Yes, I don't really understand the decision taken on en not to show
portals on article pages. On fr, for example, if you read a chemistry
article, there's a Chemistry
On Mon, Dec 14, 2009 at 11:00 AM, Steve Bennett stevag...@gmail.com wrote:
snip
On en, I can't think of any path I'm ever likely to take that would
lead me to one of the portals. Which really is a pity.
I would support more use of the more unknown featured content on the
main page, such as
I have a standing offer to assist the conversion of featured pictures to
featured media so that it highlights sounds as well as images. There
appears to be a moderate but surmountable obstacle with the monthly roster
template; Howcheng knows the details.
In order to facilitate the change with
On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 5:08 AM, Durova nadezhda.dur...@gmail.com wrote:
deteriorating from brilliant prose into mediocre prose). If the community
approved a featured star display for caption boxes the problem would
Has this been proposed? It seems logical and inoffensive.
Steve
Proposed by Durova:
Wikipedia:Village pump (proposals)#Featured content stars for featured pictures
Inoffensive? To some, not to others.
~A
On Mon, Dec 14, 2009 at 16:04, Steve Bennett stevag...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 5:08 AM, Durova nadezhda.dur...@gmail.com wrote:
Probably (without looking at the discussion) the same objections as
for photographer credits or an more information link next to
pictures. Or, even, the objections people raise to having featured
articles marked with a star.
Carcharoth
On Mon, Dec 14, 2009 at 9:36 PM, Amory Meltzer
The portal doesn't select from all featured articles, only those that
have been on the main page.
I do agree that the Featured Content portal is under-promoted though
(in fact portals generally are)
Pete / the wub
2009/12/13 Carcharoth carcharot...@googlemail.com:
As Quiddity pointed out, we
What's the best namespace or place to make a proposal that en:wp have
a random *featured* article button?
As anyone who uses the random article link knows it often turns up
places of small geographical interest. We now have a pretty damn good
library of featured content. I'd really enjoy being
On Sat, Dec 12, 2009 at 8:16 PM, Bod Notbod bodnot...@gmail.com wrote:
What's the best namespace or place to make a proposal that en:wp have
a random *featured* article button?
As anyone who uses the random article link knows it often turns up
places of small geographical interest. We now
These two links may be of interest to you:
http://tools.wikimedia.de/~dapete/random/enwiki-featured.php
http://tools.wikimedia.de/~dapete/random/enwiki-good.php
As found on [[User:Csörföly D/random featured article]]
~Amory
___
WikiEN-l mailing list
On Sat, Dec 12, 2009 at 8:46 PM, Amory Meltzer amorymelt...@gmail.com wrote:
These two links may be of interest to you:
http://tools.wikimedia.de/~dapete/random/enwiki-featured.php
http://tools.wikimedia.de/~dapete/random/enwiki-good.php
As found on [[User:Csörföly D/random featured
On Sat, Dec 12, 2009 at 12:16 PM, Bod Notbod bodnot...@gmail.com wrote:
What's the best namespace or place to make a proposal that en:wp have
a random *featured* article button?
It's essentially already there in the sidebar (3rd link down):
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Portal:Featured_content
As Quiddity pointed out, we have this random featured article feature
already. Question is, why is it not obvious? Does it need to made
clearer that we already have this? To be fair, I was unaware of the
toolserver ones. Is that something different, meaning we have *two*
ways to access a random
15 matches
Mail list logo
