2012/9/2 Michael Andersen m...@tdcadsl.dk:
But some free licenses are better than others. What would happen if one of
the winners was a GFDL? Would it not mean that we would have to add the
whole GFDL text to the calendar and wherever we would like to use the
photos?
I think that it would be
Well, although technically possible to print, I do not exclude the
possibility that the jury might favor a GFDL-only licensed picture less
than a CC BY-SA picture. It definitely makes the image less useful.
Anyway - we're bikeshedding.
Lodewijk
2012/9/3 Platonides platoni...@gmail.com
On
Tomasz
W. Kozlowski
Sendt: 2. september 2012 00:50
Til: Wiki Loves Monuments Photograph Competition
Emne: Re: [Wiki Loves Monuments] Acceptable licences (UploadCampaigns
options)
Hi Platonides,
thank you for your comment; indeed I haven't been clear enough. Your wording
is much more closer
On 01/09/12 23:23, Tomasz W. Kozłowski wrote:
One of this principles was to choose only one licence acceptable for
all pictures uploaded as part of Wiki Loves Monuments--and, for
obvious reasons, this licence is the Creative Commons Share-Alike 3.0,
also knows as CC-BY-SA 3.0.
This is mostly
