>
> Since Wikimania is in July this year, perhaps we could do this there:
> public review & discussion of the WMF plan, and using that as a point of
> departure to continue the discussion of planning from WMCON.
>
> Sam
>
I would suggest not using this WMF proposed plan as a starting point for
tal
So, there are two good news and one bad.
The most important good one is that efforts made by James, Philippe
and EC have given [global] results. It's always good to hear that we
depend less on weather conditions and more on our own work. So, thank
you for your good work! :)
I agree with you in re
Just a clarification on numbers
In James (internal) table enwps share of total number of eligible votes
is 35,4%
Participation rate state from enwp was 8,26% against mean for all 9,5%.
If enwp is excluded the participation rate for all of the rest stands at
10,2%
Enwp users also include user
hi,
as a stepping down FDC member I agree with Risker only to some extent.
Sure, the FDC will have trouble with capacity for evaluation of the whole
plan. However, it is possible to single out some programs (the famous
'core' vs. 'non-core' division) and comment on them. It does not exclude a
prof
Hello Wikimedians,
The Funds Dissemination Committee (FDC) meets twice a year to help make
decisions about how to effectively allocate movement funds to achieve the
Wikimedia movement's mission, vision, and strategy. [1] Just before the
Wikimedia Conference, the FDC met in Berlin to deliberate on
Minor correction: Appeals are due JUNE 8, 2015, not July 8.[1]
Risker/Anne
(Member of the FDC)
[1] https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Grants:APG/Information#Calendar
On 1 June 2015 at 11:18, Dariusz Jemielniak wrote:
> Hello Wikimedians,
>
> The Funds Dissemination Committee (FDC) meets twice a
Richard, the spreadsheet could be found here [1]. I compiled the list
again and it assumes some more languages (Swahili, for example), which
didn't have numbers in Ethnologue's data.
On Thu, May 28, 2015 at 7:04 AM, Asaf Bartov wrote:
> For some of these languages, I don't see that this makes sen
Milos, thanks for initiating the conversation. Some random thoughts:
1. The efforts to get people to vote are admirable, and it's heartening to
see the participation trend reversed.
2. There is the elephant in the room which is the recent DE
Mediaviewer/super protect issue. It is possible it has
Dear movement fellows,
Here is my (almost) monthly email ...
You can find on Commons everything the new policy of Wikimédia
France about its Conflict of Interest and governance:
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Gestion_des_conflits_d%27interets_Wikimedia_France.pdf
So far, we did not h
On Mon, Jun 1, 2015 at 9:26 AM, Andrew Lih wrote:
> 3. Participation in the mailing list may be a misleading indicator of
> activity or interest, as other regional or specialized forums (eg.
> Facebook, GLAM-oriented lists, etc) have emerged in recent years.
>
Let me second this. My department i
On Mon, Jun 1, 2015 at 7:51 PM, Luis Villa wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 1, 2015 at 9:26 AM, Andrew Lih wrote:
>
>> 3. Participation in the mailing list may be a misleading indicator of
>> activity or interest, as other regional or specialized forums (eg.
>> Facebook, GLAM-oriented lists, etc) have emerge
Hi Milos,
I think you're overestimating the importance of this list, which is read by
only a small portion of the community. Many people in the wider community
have no idea this exists.
Best,
--Ed
On Mon, Jun 1, 2015 at 1:57 PM, Milos Rancic wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 1, 2015 at 7:51 PM, Luis Villa
My fellow Wikimedians,
I am pleased to announce the results of the most vital exercise in
democracy in the Wikimedia movement for many years:
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/MCOTM
The first-ever Meta Collaboration of the Month (MCOTM) for June 2015 will
be on the [[Events]] page, a particularly
On Mon, Jun 1, 2015 at 11:53 AM, Milos Rancic wrote:
> * MediaWiki is developing and messages are changing. While it doesn't
> matter a lot for the main language to have 99% and not 100% of
> translated most used messages, the new one won't get a project if it's
> not 100%. (The situation as it is
On Jun 2, 2015 00:39, "Benjamin Lees" wrote:
>
> On Mon, Jun 1, 2015 at 11:53 AM, Milos Rancic wrote:
> > * MediaWiki is developing and messages are changing. While it doesn't
> > matter a lot for the main language to have 99% and not 100% of
> > translated most used messages, the new one won't g
Ed Erhart wrote:
>I think you're overestimating the importance of this list, which is read
>by only a small portion of the community. Many people in the wider
>community have no idea this exists.
Sort of. :-) In absolute numbers, of course the total number of list
subscribers/readers is a very sm
Milos Rancic wrote:
>On Jun 2, 2015 00:39, "Benjamin Lees" wrote:
>>"Won't get a project"? Are you saying that new project language
>> editions are only approved if the MediaWiki messages for that language
>> are all translated already? (Maybe I'm misunderstanding.)
>
>[...]
>
>It would be useful
On Jun 2, 2015 02:08, "MZMcBride" wrote:
>
> Milos Rancic wrote:
> >On Jun 2, 2015 00:39, "Benjamin Lees" wrote:
> >>"Won't get a project"? Are you saying that new project language
> >> editions are only approved if the MediaWiki messages for that language
> >> are all translated already? (Maybe
Actually, currently the requirements are
- most-used messages for the first project in a language
- continuing translation activity on TWN for all others
Am 02.06.2015 02:18 schrieb "Milos Rancic" :
> On Jun 2, 2015 02:08, "MZMcBride" wrote:
> >
> > Milos Rancic wrote:
> > >On Jun 2, 2015 00:39,
On Mon, Jun 1, 2015 at 10:57 AM, Milos Rancic wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 1, 2015 at 7:51 PM, Luis Villa wrote:
> > On Mon, Jun 1, 2015 at 9:26 AM, Andrew Lih wrote:
> >
> >> 3. Participation in the mailing list may be a misleading indicator of
> >> activity or interest, as other regional or specializ
20 matches
Mail list logo
