Hello Andrea,
Le dimanche 5 juillet 2015, 17:45:34 Andrea Zanni a écrit :
I tried to find the info myself, with little success:
I'm interested to know about the environmental impact of running Wikipedia
(carbon emissions, etc.) and what we are doing about it.
Sorry if I missed wikimedia-l
Thanks Guillaume, didn't find those.
It's kinda difficult though to find some useful numbers in those threads,
and some arguments I'm reading are completely crazy :-)
So I think it would be good to start a new thread.
Moreover, WMF is pretty bigger than it was in 2007 or 2009,
and I think a new
Hello everyone.
I tried to find the info myself, with little success:
I'm interested to know about the environmental impact of running Wikipedia
(carbon emissions, etc.) and what we are doing about it.
Sorry if I missed wikimedia-l threads, or other sources.
The only thing I found regarding a
On Sun, Jul 5, 2015 at 4:37 AM, Dennis During dcdur...@gmail.com wrote:
Easier for whom?
Since it'll be more machine-readable than it is now it'll be easier
for a programmer to make use of the data to build a tool like you
proposed or use it in an existing tool.
Is there an ETA for that?
No.
Hi!
I just I noticed that Cebuano and Waray-waray Wikipedia are inside the list
of the 10 Wikipedias with more articles.[1] It seems it happened during
this weekend. Maybe in the case of Waray Wikipedia happened a little
before. Somebody knows when did it was exactly? Did I miss a thread
I'm getting old, so I may not be able to wait for the completion of a
project that hasn't started. I guess I'm looking for something that can be
demonstrated soon, for one class of vocabulary (language or technical
jargon), before the year is out or sooner.
I will probably try to assemble content
An encouraging article in Technology Review:
http://www.technologyreview.com/view/539001/why-wikipedia-open-access-revolution/
Pine
___
Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines
