(snip)
>
> A use of superprotect could be to protect certain pages or settings
against
> actions stemming from the hypothetical but possible scenario that an admin
> account is compromised.
>
If the setting is so dangerous that it will cause SERIOUS problem if
misconfigured, why is it editable by
Dear all,
We are happy to announce that Wikidata is one of the 100 winning
projects of the “Germany – Land of Ideas” competition 2015. With your
support, Wikidata now even has the chance to win the Public’s Choice
Award!
At the moment, Wikidata is on rank 15. We need to be among the first
10 to e
News and notes: Superprotect, one year later; a contentious RfA
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Wikipedia_Signpost/2015-08-12/News_and_notes
In the media: Paid editing; traffic drop; Nicki Minaj
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Wikipedia_Signpost/2015-08-12/In_the_media
Forum: Commun
To summarize the numbers a bit:
Male uploads that were overwritten by anyone: 7226
Female uploads that were overwritten by anyone: 536
None uploads that were overwritten by anyone: 21484
Male uploads that were overwrote anyone: 6775
Female uploads that were overwrote anyone: 619
None uploads that
On 14 August 2015 at 11:33, Fæ wrote:
> On 14 August 2015 at 09:58, Magnus Manske
wrote:
>> Looking at "male-female" and "female-male", and considering the
much-cited
>> 15% female editor ratio, it seems women are much more overwrite-happy
than
>> men.
I'm just thinking this through again, as th
Il giorno ven, 14/08/2015 alle 01.20 +0100, Fæ ha scritto:
> I'd appreciate any views on whether there is any statistical meaning
> to be
> pulled from these figures, apart from showing that men probably
> outnumber
> women contributors by ten times on Commons.
To have a real answer you should do
On 14 August 2015 at 09:58, Magnus Manske wrote:
> Looking at "male-female" and "female-male", and considering the much-cited
> 15% female editor ratio, it seems women are much more overwrite-happy than
> men.
>
> Then again, 139:110 are not exactly numbers one does want to base
> statistics on...
Well given the case of women overwriting photos of themselves, I would
totally agree with you. In my (admittedly few) conversations with Wikipedia
article subjects, women object most to the photos of themselves, while men
talk about specific lines of text.
On Fri, Aug 14, 2015 at 10:58 AM, Magnus
especially when the overwrites are non-contentious (most of my overwrites
are to provide better quality or higher resolution for photos of paintings)
On Fri, Aug 14, 2015 at 10:25 AM, Tomasz Ganicz wrote:
> 2015-08-14 2:20 GMT+02:00 Fæ :
>
> > 15716
>
>
> First of all it seems that vast majority
Looking at "male-female" and "female-male", and considering the much-cited
15% female editor ratio, it seems women are much more overwrite-happy than
men.
Then again, 139:110 are not exactly numbers one does want to base
statistics on...
On Fri, Aug 14, 2015 at 9:25 AM Tomasz Ganicz wrote:
> 20
Dear all,
We are happy to announce that Wikidata is one of the 100 winning
projects of the “Germany – Land of Ideas” competition 2015. With your
support, Wikidata now even has the chance to win the Public’s Choice
Award!
We need to be among the first 10 to enter the next round and win the
Public’
2015-08-14 2:20 GMT+02:00 Fæ :
> 15716
First of all it seems that vast majority of Commons users do not select
their gender so they are "none". It obviously spoils the rest of the
statistics. Would be good to add to it numbers of males, females and
"nones" included, so it would be more clear whi
12 matches
Mail list logo
