Leila Zia wrote:
> […]
> On a separate note to those of you who contribute to technical spaces and
> are not happy about how some aspects have gone:
> Matthew and a few other people have been trying /really hard/ to make
> Wikimedia's technical spaces better. You know that embarking on such a p
Hi MZMcBride,
On Sat, Feb 25, 2017 at 11:15 AM, MZMcBride wrote:
>
>
> Matthew Flaschen wrote:
> >English Wikipedia policy is clear
> >(https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Sock_puppetry#Meatpuppetry):
> >"In votes or vote-like discussions, new users may be disregarded or
> >given significantl
Pine W wrote:
>When I last spent some time looking at the proposal, I too felt that the
>contributions indicated that the policy had far too little community
>influence. *However*, if you'll entertain a hypothetical with me for a
>moment, let's suppose that the status quo continues and there is
>ef
An interesting idea, and if it reduces the survey load on the community
that would be good. But one should never survey for the sake of it. Any
proposed survey question should be able to meet the test "What will you do
with the answer to this question?" In my experience, the response to that
is