Hi Frederick - Nice to hear from you again. I look forward to reading the
letter. Maryana
On Mon, Apr 11, 2022 at 9:19 PM Frederick Noronha <
fredericknoro...@gmail.com> wrote:
> https://www.opensourceforu.com/2022/01/an-open-letter-to-maryana-iskander/
>
> --
>
>
https://www.opensourceforu.com/2022/01/an-open-letter-to-maryana-iskander/
--
April 2022 | Frederick Noronha. 784 Saligao 403511 Goa
Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa | M (after 2pm) +91 9822122436 Twitter @fn
1
Maggie,
As you correctly noted, I lost a verb there. What I meant to say was: "How
can they be prevented from inserting erroneous material without causing
them to doubt their own perceptions etc. in a way that they may well – in
good faith – *feel* is malicious?"
We have this all the time: people
Hello,
What does the incriminated sentence actually mean?
"The Wikimedia movement does not endorse "race" and "ethnicity" as
meaningful distinctions among people."
Does this mean that
* the WM is against; or
* that the WM is neutral on the topic?
And, after reading the English Wikipedia article
I have been working on the UCoC about as long as anybody, if not as
intensely as some. Hence, I have some confidence in saying that it is the
Foundation's role to shepherd the Movement Strategy recommendation to
reality in creating a baseline of behavioral standards that are
movement-wide. *I* have
It's almost as if ratifying an incomplete document based on vague framework
and future changes is a terrible idea.
That this is coming up now is not the least bit surprising. It was brought
up, along with many things, during one of the arbitrarily endpointed
"discussion" periods that involved peop
On Fri, 8 Apr 2022 18:36:12 +0100
Anasuya Sengupta wrote:
> Tl;dr Urgent need to address the note denying race and ethnicity as
> “meaningful distinctions among people” in the Universal Code of Conduct
> (UCoC). The current wording is highly problematic and can result in
> endorsing systemic and
Dear Maggie,
Could I ask you for help with a couple of things:
1. The UCoC states that "sharing information concerning other contributors'
Wikimedia activity outside the projects" is harassment. Is it really the
WMF's intention to prohibit public discussions of controversial editing? To
give some
Let me clarify a few points.
- The vote was intended to surface what concerns might exist more
broadly in the international communities, not all of whom engage in Meta
discussions. Staff were neither asked to convince people to vote for the
enforcement guidelines as written nor even en
Our conduct policies were carefully crafted by hundreds of brilliant people
over the course of twenty years, building upon endless experience and
detailed discussions that could fill books upon books.
The UCoC Project ... seems to be built to supersede all that we've built in
this area, with an ex
Hello everyone
_Short version : _
we launched a new podcast in March. *From tech gurus to authors,
educators to activists, the Inspiring Open podcast draws wisdom and
insights from women who intersect the 'open movement' and inspire with
their thoughts and actions. On all your favorite podcast
11 matches
Mail list logo
