for WMF to reply to affected persons who
initially approach directly, and the great reluctance at WMF to
circumvent the community processes without DMCA motions.
BRUENTRUP
On 12/14/14, geni geni...@gmail.com wrote:
On 14 December 2014 at 05:49, Bruentrup claus.bruent...@gmail.com wrote
, as they
regularly do, to identify and prosecute the culprits.
BRUENTRUP
On 12/14/14, Yaroslav M. Blanter pute...@mccme.ru wrote:
On 2014-12-14 06:49, Bruentrup wrote:
Hi
One of those 6 successful DMCA's of 2014 was filed by us.
http://wikimediafoundation.org/wiki
Wikipedia
and off it.
We await a reply from OTRS or Ms.Tretikov's office to our client's
emails reporting the IP infringements.
BRUENTRUP
On 12/14/14, Yaroslav M. Blanter pute...@mccme.ru wrote:
On 2014-12-14 14:05, Bruentrup wrote:
And that will magically make all the infringements of IAC's IP
You cannot crop a minor trademark element, eg. logo, incidentally
located within a free photographic image and upload it to Commons as
a free use instance of that trademark / logo.
BRUENTRUP
On 12/13/14, JP Béland lebo.bel...@gmail.com wrote:
We're talking strictly about copyright here
Perhaps because on Commons village pump, non-regulars, interacting
politely and civilly, are harassed, abused and also blocked without cause.
Perhaps because the discussion system at Commons is broken, and
participation there is oftentimes a complete waste of time.
BRUENTRUP
On 12/13/14, Fæ fae
takedowns,
and DMCAs must be the exception rather than the norm.
BRUENTRUP
On 12/13/14, Fæ fae...@gmail.com wrote:
On 13 Dec 2014 16:41, Bruentrup claus.bruent...@gmail.com wrote:
Perhaps because on Commons village pump, non-regulars, interacting
politely and civilly, are harassed, abused and also
, ticketed, and with DMCAs as an appellate
mechanism. Till then the WMF must also immediately cease advising
affected non-users to resolve their infringements with their
communities.
BRUENTRUP
On 12/14/14, pajz pajzm...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
On 13 December 2014 at 19:46, Bruentrup claus.bruent
