It probably isn't fair. But then again without actually contacting the
copyright holder the CC licenses are nothing more than a indicator that
reuse may be OK. Then when you get into chains of derivatives you are in
a world of pain. Websites are particularly prone to fouling up the
licenses.
On 06/03/2017 06:37, Gergő Tisza wrote:
On Sun, Mar 5, 2017 at 6:06 AM, Todd Allen wrote:
I'm not a German speaker, and I know context and nuance can be lost in
machine translation. That being said, the one about someone who was
offering attribution and then got slapped
On 07/03/2017 02:24, James Forrester wrote:
On Mon, 6 Mar 2017 at 18:14 Lilburne <lilbu...@tygers-of-wrath.net
<mailto:lilbu...@tygers-of-wrath.net>> wrote:
For the last 12 years Flickr have a system where people can click on a
link and get the HTML or BBCODE that properl
For the last 12 years Flickr have a system where people can click on a
link and get the HTML or BBCODE that properly attributes the image along
with the link to the license and all the rest of the requirements for
the CC license. Why can't commons do the same?
Otherwise its not hard to
On 02/01/2017 00:52, Pine W wrote:
(: I think that Legal could at least describe in general terms what they
are currently doing and have plans to do in the near future.
If it turns out that the answers are "we aren't doing much and we aren't
planning to do more", then yes, asking the higher-ups
On 21/12/2016 02:53, Newyorkbrad wrote:
I think it might be useful to focus on how any of the proposed changes
to the law would affect Wikipedia/Wikimedia specifically, apart from
the broader philosophical discussion. Is there a good link for
exactly what changes to the safe harbor laws are
bility for
anything a user of your site might choose to do. You'd have to be
insane to do that.
Todd
On Mon, Dec 19, 2016 at 1:36 PM, Lilburne
<lilbu...@tygers-of-wrath.net <mailto:lilbu...@tygers-of-wrath.net>>
wrote:
On 19/12/2016 16:45, David Gerard wrote:
For
e to do. You'd have to be insane to do that.
Todd
On Mon, Dec 19, 2016 at 1:36 PM, Lilburne
<lilbu...@tygers-of-wrath.net <mailto:lilbu...@tygers-of-wrath.net>>
wrote:
> On 19/12/2016 16:45, David Gerard wrote:
>
>> For various reasons
On 19/12/2016 16:45, David Gerard wrote:
For various reasons * I follow music industry news. One drum the record
industry has been beating *hard* in the past year is attempts to reduce the
DMCA "safe harbor" provisions in order to squeeze more money from YouTube.
It's been a running theme
On 25/06/2016 06:49, Mitar wrote:
Hi!
I am an occasional editor of Wikipedia, I read it a lot, I edit
sometimes, and I am at all not familiar with bureaucracies and rules
Wikipedia community has developed through years (call me lazy, but
they simply always look too scary and too many for me to
acknowledge and reflect this correction.
Thank you,
Sam
On Tue, Apr 5, 2016 at 12:17 PM, Lilburne
<lilbu...@tygers-of-wrath.net <mailto:lilbu...@tygers-of-wrath.net>>
wrote:
Its not "a large-scale online database" per se. Its the commercial
aspect of it that is at
On 29/02/2016 22:10, George Herbert wrote:
Just to confirm, all Jimmy's email in these threads were in my Gmail spam
folder when I looked.
If you're using Gmail, go look at the spam folder and bring his messages back
in...
Perhaps that is the penalty for attempting to compete with search
On 16/02/2016 18:39, Lodewijk wrote:
If we were publishers trying to make a buck out of selling the work, I
would agree with you, and move on. However, that is not what we want to do
as a movement. We don't try to take advantage, but we want to build upon
works. We want to collaborate and stand
On 27/01/2016 21:04, Andreas Kolbe wrote:
On Wed, Jan 27, 2016 at 8:54 PM, Milos Rancic wrote:
Thank you, Arnnon!
Indeed. Thank you, Arnnon, and best wishes to you.
This is a reminder that very little touched by Google remains untainted,
in the UK we hope that
On 26/01/2016 20:27, Pine W wrote:
While I realize that staying on may be your personal preference, I believe
that for the good of WMF and for our collective movement, you should resign.
A quote from history would have been more succinct:
http://quotationsbook.com/quote/29200/
On 10/01/2016 04:04, Comet styles wrote:
Jimmy has always been biased so I personally won't trust his words but
the way this is playing out, its like James somehow revealed the pass
codes to the WMF Nuclear launch codes or something...did he?
A board made up to govern a community driven project
out of 10 gas stations delivered Gasoline from the Diesel
pump?
On 29/11/2015 10:38, Gerard Meijssen wrote:
Hoi,
More FUD. Poisonous how?
Thanks,
GerardM
On 29 November 2015 at 11:33, Lilburne <lilbu...@tygers-of-wrath.net
<mailto:lilbu...@tygers-of-wrath.net>> wrote:
On 2
On 29/11/2015 09:42, Gerard Meijssen wrote:
Hoi, Wikidata is a wiki and, you seem to always forget that. > > The corruption of data .. how? Each statement is its own data item
> how do you corrupt that? As I say so often, when you get a collection
> that is 80% correct you have an error rate
On 29/11/2015 00:37, Gerard Meijssen wrote:
Hoi,
It was from the Myanmar WIkipedia that a lot of data was imported to
Wikidata. Data that did not exist elsewhere. I do not care really what
"Freedom House" says. I do not know them, I do know that the data is
relevant and useful It was even the
On 29/07/2015 09:01, Petr Kadlec wrote:
Really? Neither the word instititution nor third party [website] appear
in the text of the CC license, so on what exactly do you base this very
specific distinction just so narrowly fitting our behavior (no image
attribution within articles, only on the
On 21/07/2015 08:00, rupert THURNER wrote:
On Mon, Jul 20, 2015 at 11:46 PM, Lilburne lilbu...@tygers-of-wrath.net wrote:
On 20/07/2015 19:38, Andy Mabbett wrote:
On 20 July 2015 at 18:09, Robert Rohde raro...@gmail.com wrote:
it is also hard for me to get behind the
notion of punishing
On 20/07/2015 19:38, Andy Mabbett wrote:
On 20 July 2015 at 18:09, Robert Rohde raro...@gmail.com wrote:
it is also hard for me to get behind the
notion of punishing someone for demanding that reusers due the things that
Commons actually recommends that they do.
It's not a question of
On 30/06/2015 10:58, Ricordisamoa wrote:
Il 30/06/2015 11:41, Lilburne ha scritto:
The average lifespan of a webpage is about 77 days. It matters not
whether the site is still running or dead. Webmasters shuffle stuff
about and delete things at will. Click on the random article button
and see
The average lifespan of a webpage is about 77 days. It matters not
whether the site is still running or dead. Webmasters shuffle stuff
about and delete things at will. Click on the random article button and
see a) how many of the first 10 have external links, and b) how many of
those links are
your complaint about the John Dee article, there is an
opportunity for you. You claim to know the subject matter.
Thanks,
GerardM
On 5 April 2015 at 12:06, Lilburne lilbu...@tygers-of-wrath.net
mailto:lilbu...@tygers-of-wrath.net wrote:
On 05/04/2015 06:36, Gerard Meijssen wrote
On 05/04/2015 06:36, Gerard Meijssen wrote:
Hoi,
Reliable is not an absolute. Wikipedia is in the final analysis an
encyclopaedia. It is not original research.
One can indeed engage in original research by cherry picking the sources.
Studies have indicated that
Wikipedia is as reliable as
On 02/04/2015 02:54, Mike Godwin wrote:
Andreas writes:
Prominent organisations campaigning for a free and open web very
strongly disagree with your view.
I said there are no facts, and you responded by citing opinion pieces.
That's cool, but opinions are not themselves facts.
Furthermore, in
On 05/04/2015 14:13, Mike Godwin wrote:
Lilburne writes:
My friends and colleagues at EFF, Access Now, and elsewhere -- as well
as individual scholars and commentators like Marvin Ammori -- know me,
Those will all be Google shills correct?
Incorrect. My work, and EFF's work, to take two
On 12/01/2015 20:59, Andreas Kolbe wrote:
As for the fundraiser's duration, I believe the 2014 fundraiser ran for 30
days (December 2 to December 31, 2014). This is longer than last year, and
at any rate much longer than 2012, right?
You need to get the most out of the Goose as it nears the
Perhaps they need education on the inherent biases.
http://wikipediocracy.com/2014/12/24/wikipedia-all-murdered-israeli-children-are-murdered-by-arabs/
___
Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
On 04/07/2014 09:37, Andy Mabbett wrote:
On Jul 4, 2014 7:55 AM, Frédéric Schütz sch...@mathgen.ch wrote:
Their main worry seems to be how do we make sure that people do not use
the pictures in a way we're not happy with
That question qualifies as frequently asked; my usual answer is to the
31 matches
Mail list logo