By cabalish I mean not closed lists with clear membership process as
cultural partners is but the like of the paris group where you've got to
be a part of a cabal in order to even know about it (or have cabal
member mention it somewhere in front of you).
--Base
On 10.06.2015 13:46, Andy
I'm guessing that he's referring to the attendees of a GLAM meeting that
was held in Paris a few months ago and is comprehensively documented on
Meta:
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/2015_European_GLAMwiki_Coordinators_meeting
Yesterday, I asked the ~15 attendees of that meeting a followup
Yes, that's the one I'm about. It's good that all these things are
documented at least somewhere but it would be good to have them in one
place. I don't think it's a very nice thing when we have almost half a
dozen of GLAM lists all documented in different places. It's not very
important who
Yes, this mailing list is still alive, and the membership is open to
Wikipedians who understand how to jump the hoops of the meta page. The meta
page is not only the place where you can sign up for the list, but also the
place where you should discuss this list if you object to it in any way. I
am
