To: Wikimedia Mailing List
Subject: Re: [Wikimedia-l] [Wiki Loves Monuments] Wiki Loves Monuments in Italy
largely blocked by WMF fundraising
First, thanks to all of those who worked in good faith, with patience and care
for each other to solve this problem. I appreciate the level of compromise
.wikimedia.org [mailto:
> > wikimedia-l-boun...@lists.wikimedia.org] On Behalf Of Pine W
> > Sent: Friday, 04 September 2015 1:45 PM
> > To: Wikimedia Mailing List
> > Subject: Re: [Wikimedia-l] [Wiki Loves Monuments] Wiki Loves Monuments in
> > Italy largely blocked by WMF
r-w...@live.com> wrote:
> >
> > > Thank you Romaine for setting up the RFC on meta [1]!
> > >
> > > So we can see what the community thinks about this.
> > >
> > > [1]
> > > https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Requests_for_comment/Fundraising_ban
[mailto:wikimedia-l-boun...@lists.wikimedia.org] On Behalf Of Pine W
Sent: Friday, 04 September 2015 8:43 AM
To: Wikimedia Mailing List
Subject: Re: [Wikimedia-l] [Wiki Loves Monuments] Wiki Loves Monuments in Italy
largely blocked by WMF fundraising
Yes, I think it is the case that Fundraising and other
oun...@lists.wikimedia.org [mailto:
> wikimedia-l-boun...@lists.wikimedia.org] On Behalf Of Pine W
> Sent: Friday, 04 September 2015 8:43 AM
> To: Wikimedia Mailing List
> Subject: Re: [Wikimedia-l] [Wiki Loves Monuments] Wiki Loves Monuments in
> Italy largely blocked by WMF f
gt; > -Original Message-
> > From: wikimedia-l-boun...@lists.wikimedia.org [mailto:
> > wikimedia-l-boun...@lists.wikimedia.org] On Behalf Of Pine W
> > Sent: Thursday, 03 September 2015 10:51 PM
> > To: Wikimedia Mailing List
> > Subject: Re: [Wikimedia-l
edia.org [mailto:
> wikimedia-l-boun...@lists.wikimedia.org] On Behalf Of Pine W
> Sent: Friday, 04 September 2015 1:45 PM
> To: Wikimedia Mailing List
> Subject: Re: [Wikimedia-l] [Wiki Loves Monuments] Wiki Loves Monuments in
> Italy largely blocked by WMF fundraising
>
> I guess I'm not clear
...@lists.wikimedia.org] On Behalf Of Pine W
Sent: Thursday, 03 September 2015 10:51 PM
To: Wikimedia Mailing List
Subject: Re: [Wikimedia-l] [Wiki Loves Monuments] Wiki Loves Monuments in Italy
largely blocked by WMF fundraising
I just want to respond to this point in particular:
"Postp
015 10:51 PM
> To: Wikimedia Mailing List
> Subject: Re: [Wikimedia-l] [Wiki Loves Monuments] Wiki Loves Monuments in
> Italy largely blocked by WMF fundraising
>
> I just want to respond to this point in particular:
>
> "Postponing the Italian fundraising campaign means
I just want to respond to this point in particular:
"Postponing the Italian fundraising campaign means for the first time in at
least 4 years, the fundraising team will not be meeting a target. The team
will pick up extra work in October to make up for work missed in September.
It's not possible
On Wed, Aug 19, 2015 at 6:32 AM, Craig Franklin
wrote:
> It has been my experience that site banners are the best way to reach
> casual readers who are not already integrated into the projects and
> existing communication channels. This is why the Fundraising team run
Mailing List; Wiki Loves Monuments Photograph Competition
Cc: Wikimedia Chapters general discussions
Subject: Re: [Wikimedia-l] [Wiki Loves Monuments] Wiki Loves Monuments in Italy
largely blocked by WMF fundraising
Hello everybody.
I'm happy to announce that the Wikimedia Foundation has decided
g 2015 19:04:41 +0200
> > > From: romaine.w...@gmail.com
> > > To: wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org;
> > wikilovesmonume...@lists.wikimedia.org
> > > Subject: Re: [Wikimedia-l] [Wiki Loves Monuments] Wiki Loves
> > > Monuments
> > in Italy lar
It would be interesting to contact DPReview and Flickr to ask if they'd
agree to promote this campaign.
Pine
On Aug 31, 2015 12:36 AM, "Gergo Tisza" wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 19, 2015 at 6:32 AM, Craig Franklin >
> wrote:
>
> > It has been my
s.
> > >
> > > [1]
> > >
> > https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Requests_for_comment/Fundraising_banner_or_Wiki_Loves_Monuments_banner
> > >
> > > > Date: Sun, 30 Aug 2015 19:04:41 +0200
> > > > From: romaine.w...@gmail.com
> > > &
Congratulations on reaching agreement - to all parties concerned.
I understand that is has not been easy, so well done!
Sandra Rientjes
Directeur/Executive Director Wikimedia Nederland
tel.(+31) (0)30 3200238
mob. (+31) (0)6 31786379
www.wikimedia.nl
*Postadres*:
Cheers,
> > P
> >
> > -Original Message-
> > From: wikimedia-l-boun...@lists.wikimedia.org [mailto:
> > wikimedia-l-boun...@lists.wikimedia.org] On Behalf Of Andrea Zanni
> > Sent: Sunday, 30 August 2015 10:21 PM
> > To: Wikimedia Mailing List;
On Mon, Aug 31, 2015 at 3:01 PM, Andreas Kolbe wrote:
> Unless "just" meant something like "five hours" ago, Andrea at least only
> seems to have learned of this agreement *after* the RfC launched.
>
Yes, it was meant as "a few hours ago".
I received the mail from Lisa's
<
> > steinsplitter-w...@live.com> wrote:
> >
> > > Thank you Romaine for setting up the RFC on meta [1]!
> > >
> > > So we can see what the community thinks about this.
> > >
> > > [1]
> > > https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Requ
...@alk.edu.pl;
denny.vrande...@kit.edu; jwa...@wikia.com; s...@wikimedia.org
CC: wikilovesmonume...@lists.wikimedia.org; wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Subject: Re: [Wikimedia-l] [Wiki Loves Monuments] Wiki Loves Monuments in
Italy largely blocked by WMF fundraising
dear board,
allow me
Note also that there is an on-going discussion with the WMF Board on
fundraising ethics here:
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia_Foundation_Board_noticeboard#Discussion_of_fundraising_ethics
Every year, readers are told that money is required to keep Wikipedia
online and ad-free another
/Fundraising_banner_or_Wiki_Loves_Monuments_banner
Date: Sun, 30 Aug 2015 19:04:41 +0200
From: romaine.w...@gmail.com
To: wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org;
wikilovesmonume...@lists.wikimedia.org
Subject: Re: [Wikimedia-l] [Wiki Loves Monuments] Wiki Loves Monuments
in Italy largely blocked by WMF fundraising
Hi all
To: wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org; wikilovesmonume...@lists.wikimedia.org
Subject: Re: [Wikimedia-l] [Wiki Loves Monuments] Wiki Loves Monuments in
Italy largely blocked by WMF fundraising
Hi all,
Having spoken with some people, I have come to the conclusion that it is
time to ask the Wikimedia
Please let us not mingle two very separate and delicate discussions:
1) Whether we should do the extra effort of fundraising at all (this is
what Andreas was arguing about, it seems)
2) If we decide to fundraise, how to involve the community and affiliates
in a timely, orderly and effective
I think both of these issues are about community involvement, Lodewijk, or
rather the lack of it. The community is simply being stonewalled, on both
issues.
And to be clear, I am absolutely in favour of fundraising. I just want it
done transparently, so donors understand clearly that their
...@wikia.com;
s...@wikimedia.org
CC: wikilovesmonume...@lists.wikimedia.org;
wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Subject: Re: [Wikimedia-l] [Wiki Loves Monuments] Wiki Loves Monuments
in Italy largely blocked by WMF fundraising
dear board,
allow me to directly ask you to stop these fundraising
...@gmail.com; jmh...@gmail.com;
dar...@alk.edu.pl; denny.vrande...@kit.edu; jwa...@wikia.com;
s...@wikimedia.org
CC: wikilovesmonume...@lists.wikimedia.org;
wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Subject: Re: [Wikimedia-l] [Wiki Loves Monuments] Wiki Loves Monuments
in Italy largely blocked by WMF
: Re: [Wikimedia-l] [Wiki Loves Monuments] Wiki Loves
Monuments
in Italy largely blocked by WMF fundraising
Hi all,
Having spoken with some people, I have come to the conclusion that it
is
time to ask the Wikimedia community what they think about this
situation. I
have
On Sun, Aug 30, 2015 at 9:20 PM, Andrea Zanni zanni.andre...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hello everybody.
I'm happy to announce that the Wikimedia Foundation has decided not to run
the Fundraising banner in Italy during September.
In the last week, the Fundraising Team and Wikimedia Italia's board
: [Wikimedia-l] [Wiki Loves Monuments] Wiki Loves
Monuments
in Italy largely blocked by WMF fundraising
Hi all,
Having spoken with some people, I have come to the conclusion that
it
is
time to ask the Wikimedia community what they think about this
situation. I
From: romaine.w...@gmail.com
To: wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org;
wikilovesmonume...@lists.wikimedia.org
Subject: Re: [Wikimedia-l] [Wiki Loves Monuments] Wiki Loves
Monuments
in Italy largely blocked by WMF fundraising
Hi all,
Having spoken with some people, I
, 30 Aug 2015 19:04:41 +0200
From: romaine.w...@gmail.com
To: wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org;
wikilovesmonume...@lists.wikimedia.org
Subject: Re: [Wikimedia-l] [Wiki Loves Monuments] Wiki Loves Monuments
in Italy largely blocked by WMF fundraising
Hi all,
Having spoken
Date: Sun, 30 Aug 2015 19:04:41 +0200
From: romaine.w...@gmail.com
To: wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org;
wikilovesmonume...@lists.wikimedia.org
Subject: Re: [Wikimedia-l] [Wiki Loves Monuments] Wiki Loves Monuments
in Italy largely blocked by WMF fundraising
Hi all,
Having
dear board,
allow me to directly ask you to stop these fundraising persons to spoil
wiki loves monuments because of less than intelligent KPIs. WMF cannot and
should not behave like an elephant in the porcelain shop. there is a simple
technical solution to the problem below, to have a combined
Hello everyone.
Sorry for the long mail but we wanted to explain the situation for
Wikimedia Italia.
The conversation is going on and it's better to clear some important
points.
In the second week of August Wikimedia Italia has been contacted by
Kalliope Tsouroupidou and later by Jessica Robell,
Il giorno lun, 24/08/2015 alle 13.08 +0200, Jane Darnell ha scritto:
What I meant to say is that though the impact
of no banner might be great, it is not so great as it would be for
those
countries who can attract newbies to the competition. The Italian
situation
is so complicated that I
Hi Jane,
Yes, Italy is one of those odd countries without freedom of panorama. The
copyright on photos of monuments is held by local governments. Wikimedia
Italy has as large task to get permission from these hundreds/thousands
local administrations for the photos uploaded. Therefore organising
I think you misunderstand me. What I meant to say is that though the impact
of no banner might be great, it is not so great as it would be for those
countries who can attract newbies to the competition. The Italian situation
is so complicated that I don't think their proportion of casual
Hi Romaine,
And the outcome is ridiculous. This is not a compromise. The Italian WLM
team has been crashed under the weight and preponderance of the Wikimedia
Foundation.
Well - it *is* a compromise. It isn't what you want and I think I
understand your reasons for thinking it will have a very
Giving Wiki Loves Monuments the worst possible situation is certainly not a
compromise, but a situation in what users from the community are crushed
under the weight of the foundation. A compromise is, according to the
dictionary, a situation in what both parties concede something. In this
case,
I am not sure how the Italian WLM works, but I believe they do still
attract newbies to the competition. I am not sure about their proportion of
casual
uploaders/experienced uploaders but we haven't seen figures either way
there.
Richard Symonds
Wikimedia UK
0207 065 0992
Wikimedia UK is a
Hi Jane,
The situation is more complicated for the organisers, yes.
But for participants in the contest it is not complicated. The Italian WLM
team has organised it in such way it is easy to participate.
Greetings,
Romaine
2015-08-24 13:08 GMT+02:00 Jane Darnell jane...@gmail.com:
I think you
Not sure how to measure this, but it would be interesting for our stats if
we COULD measure this. I define a casual uploader as someone who comes to
the upload wizard through the WLM easy upload link from a Wikipedia page
rather than some other way.
On Mon, Aug 24, 2015 at 1:11 PM, Richard
On 21 August 2015 at 21:42, Risker risker...@gmail.com wrote:
The process was stopped because it was
costing more money to raise funds that way, and as a movement it's very,
very difficult to justify the international level of fundraising in a way
that results in much higher costs.
I doubt
a pleasure to do stuff together with them! Really.
Date: Sat, 22 Aug 2015 01:59:46 +0200
From: romaine.w...@gmail.com
To: wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Subject: Re: [Wikimedia-l] [Wiki Loves Monuments] Wiki Loves Monuments in
Italy largely blocked by WMF fundraising
I think you describe
Hello Luis,
Organising Wiki Loves Monuments is a hard job. For the world wide Wikimedia
community Wiki Loves Monuments is the largest and important project.
Everywhere around the world cultural heritage can be found, and the
community organises Wiki Loves Monuments to have content created in
Hi, Romaine-
[tl;dr: Fundraising has a hard job. The Board has asked them to raise a lot
of money, and fall in Europe is very important to doing that efficiently.
We have tried to reach a compromise, but no compromise is perfect. In the
long run, we would like to work together to try to figure
From my perspective, this strikes me as part of the reason why national
organisations are well suited to running the Wikimedia fundraising campaigns
rather than a global organisation: if WMIT was organising both WLM and the
national fundraising campaign, then this conflict wouldn't have arisen
I know the Italian Chapter, the online fundraising team, and community
liaisons have been talking about solutions for a while and I won’t get in
the way of that, but I thought I would offer a few ideas on some of the
online organizing tactics being discussed here. This probably falls in the
Il giorno gio, 20/08/2015 alle 01.26 -0400, Risker ha scritto:
[...] perhaps a big bright button on the sidebar that says Upload
images for Wiki Loves Monuments here! may be technically feasible.
This might be a way to mitigate the problem, although I'm not sure
whether it's technically
Given the huge amount of work, the liability and legislative issues and
problems with transferring funds across international borders, I'm not
persuaded; having dozens of paid fundraising teams is not cost-effective by
any stretch of the imagination. The process was stopped because it was
costing
On 20 August 2015 at 06:26, Risker risker...@gmail.com wrote:
I can understand the frustration that members of WMIT are expressing here,
but I also see Fundraising's point. I wonder if there are not some other
options that could be considered. For example, instead of a banner,
perhaps a big
I think you describe the essence of the problem: there is a big gap between
the community and the Wikimedia Foundation.
I have a long list of problems from the past years that all seem to
originate in this basic problem. The Wikimedia Foundation is too much
de-attached from the community.
At the
If the fundraising banner was planned in November to be shown in Italy, the
problem would have been the same. Only the time could have a positive
impact.
Also then something has been missed: Wiki Loves Monuments is a sticky
project in September, already for years, as it is attached to a world
Would it be possible for the WLM banner to show on the Main Page only
during 8-22 September, with the fundraising banner on every other
page?
--
John Vandenberg
___
Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
This is not the first time this conflict appears, but this is the worst
outcome ever so far. In all the years I have been asking for an explanation
why it is not possible to move it, or why it is urgently to do it in
September, nothing reasonable has been provided for that. Nothing in all
those
Why wmf needs to put a fundraising banner every year on wp. Isn't there enough
money in Frisco?
Just wondering :)
Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2015 16:48:02 +1000
From: jay...@gmail.com
To: wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Subject: Re: [Wikimedia-l] [Wiki Loves Monuments] Wiki Loves Monuments
Which is Fundraising's point? I haven't seen anything here about why WMF so
urgently needs to request Italian donations in September.
Am 20.08.2015 07:27 schrieb Risker risker...@gmail.com:
I can understand the frustration that members of WMIT are expressing here,
but I also see Fundraising's
There's a more general problem here we should fix:
We already know that effectiveness of any single banner drops off
dramatically after the first few views. So there's rarely a reason to run
a continuous banner -- certainly not if there are other banners to run.
We should improve the
It has been my experience that site banners are the best way to reach
casual readers who are not already integrated into the projects and
existing communication channels. This is why the Fundraising team run
banners, rather than begging for money through Facebook and targeted talk
page messages,
On 19 August 2015 at 14:26, Sam Klein sjkl...@hcs.harvard.edu wrote:
There's a more general problem here we should fix:
We already know that effectiveness of any single banner drops off
dramatically after the first few views. So there's rarely a reason to run
a continuous banner -- certainly
Yes, Andrew is right. Navigation is a very important focus point of
organising every Wiki Loves Monuments.
The complexity of the navigation is that MediaWiki and the whole group of
Wikimedia wikis is not designed for navigation, but designed for showing
content. In the past eight years small
I can understand the frustration that members of WMIT are expressing here,
but I also see Fundraising's point. I wonder if there are not some other
options that could be considered. For example, instead of a banner,
perhaps a big bright button on the sidebar that says Upload images for
Wiki
Hi!
I think one point is skipped, before this should be discussed at all: why
is it not possible to move a banner to another month?
This question needs an answer first. Each time this problem occurs,
multiple years now in different occasions, the fundraising team says they
can't move the banner,
Any reasons the WLM 'banner' can't become a Main Page panel like the
ones on Commons?
Il 20/08/2015 07:26, Risker ha scritto:
I can understand the frustration that members of WMIT are expressing here,
but I also see Fundraising's point. I wonder if there are not some other
options that could
If a local community wants this, they can create such of course. But I
think most visitors from Wikipedia do not visit the Main Page.
2015-08-20 7:41 GMT+02:00 Ricordisamoa ricordisa...@openmailbox.org:
Any reasons the WLM 'banner' can't become a Main Page panel like the ones
on Commons?
Il
Sad news indeed.
Is there a public discussion about this issue anywhere?
Can we get the WMF comments about it publicly?
Best regards,
antanana
ED of Wikimedia Ukraine
2015-08-18 21:42 GMT+03:00 Romaine Wiki romaine.w...@gmail.com:
Hi all,
Sad news.
The title of this thread seems a bit hard,
Hi Antanana,
And I forgot to mention, this same issue existed in 2014 as well, with also
there the downside effects.
This subject is of banners has been discussed internally with the local
Wiki Loves Monuments team, after I tried to gave some insights in the
matter. I think this is done so
On Tue, Aug 18, 2015 at 2:59 PM, Romaine Wiki romaine.w...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi Antanana,
And I forgot to mention, this same issue existed in 2014 as well, with also
there the downside effects.
This subject is of banners has been discussed internally with the local
Wiki Loves Monuments
Hi Romaine,
Sad to hear this. I remember running in the same situation a couple of
years ago (2013) when a really prominent new privacy policy banner was
put up for everyone with a high percentage for most of the month [1].
Back than I contacted the people at the WMF responsible for that. I
Yes it can be possible without touching the fundraising's banner.
The banner can be put in the Mediawiki:sitenotice in each project and
can cohabitate with the fundraising's banner.
The real problem is that a small banner can have only a limited effect.
On 18.08.2015 23:31, Platonides wrote:
Really sad indeed. Specially for a country with such a complicated
situation as Italy.
Given that they are going to take you banner time, maybe they would be
possible to be convinced to include a small WLM ad in the donation page?
I would expect targetting people that visit the page but
72 matches
Mail list logo