the problem is all projects use a different format :)
Maybe it is worth the effort to investigate if we can come to a single
format... at least on the input side.
Lodewijk
2014-08-04 3:43 GMT+02:00 Gryllida gryll...@fastmail.fm:
Does the same apply to other sister projects? It could make
Lodewijk:
Yes indeed. The citation/footnote coding format for different language
editions of Wikipedia is not the same, not to mention the other Wikimedia
projects.
I wonder if this is something that Wikidata could (eventually) handle?
I have been hoping that one day all books (at least those with
On 04/08/2014, Liam Wyatt liamwy...@gmail.com wrote:
...
I wonder if this is something that Wikidata could (eventually) handle?
I have been hoping that one day all books (at least those with ISBNs) could
have a Wikidata entry. This would mean that all of the bibliographic
There is no point in
On 4 August 2014 08:18, Lodewijk lodew...@effeietsanders.org wrote:
the problem is all projects use a different format :)
Maybe it is worth the effort to investigate if we can come to a single
format... at least on the input side.
I believe such is being discussed, as part of the wider
On 4 August 2014 11:15, Liam Wyatt liamwy...@gmail.com wrote:
I wonder if this is something that Wikidata could (eventually) handle?
I have a brain-dump about how this might work, in my user pace at:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Pigsonthewing/Citations_-_the_future
For me, one of the
On 4 August 2014 11:43, Fæ fae...@gmail.com wrote:
The current editing interface on the English Wikipedia has the
cite tool which effectively does the same thing if you put in the
ISBN
I find that often rimes out, sadly. (It works well with Google books
URLs, though.)
--
Andy Mabbett
Google Scholar search results each have a cite link, which generates
citation text to copy-and-paste in three formats (MLA, APA, Chicago).
Is there someone at Google we can talk to, to get Wikipedia's citation
format included?
For English-language users (or results), the {{Cite journal}}
Hmm, maybe another option is to accept BibTeX format on our side, possibly
via a Lua module?
-Liangent
On Aug 4, 2014 1:15 AM, Andy Mabbett a...@pigsonthewing.org.uk wrote:
Google Scholar search results each have a cite link, which generates
citation text to copy-and-paste in three formats
Possibly relevant as an alternative solution to the problem:
https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Citoid
I suspect that Google would be reluctant to add a Wikimedia citation
format, because there is no one Wikimedia citation format. (Happy to be
corrected on that if I'm wrong, though.)
Luis
On Sun,
On 3 August 2014 19:01, Luis Villa lvi...@wikimedia.org wrote:
I suspect that Google would be reluctant to add
a Wikimedia citation format
Trove, the Australian National Library's newspaper archive, are happy to do so.
because there is no one Wikimedia citation format.
(Happy to be
On Sun, Aug 3, 2014 at 12:25 PM, Andy Mabbett a...@pigsonthewing.org.uk
wrote:
On 3 August 2014 19:01, Luis Villa lvi...@wikimedia.org wrote:
I suspect that Google would be reluctant to add
a Wikimedia citation format
Trove, the Australian National Library's newspaper archive, are happy
Google Scholar seem to do very well on the Citoid tests:
http://zotero-translator-tests.s3-website-us-east-1.amazonaws.com/testTranslators.html#date=2014-07-30browser=cversion=4.0.SOURCE.9219100
Just make sure to get that thing running and we will have a more robust
solution to ask potential
On 3 August 2014 20:44, Luis Villa lvi...@wikimedia.org wrote:
because there is no one Wikimedia citation format.
(Happy to be corrected on that if I'm wrong, though.)
There isn't, hence I suggested the most suitable for scholarly
citations in English.
Both Google and Wikimedia claim to
Does the same apply to other sister projects? It could make sense to make such
request for all...
On Mon, 4 Aug 2014, at 03:14, Andy Mabbett wrote:
Google Scholar search results each have a cite link, which generates
citation text to copy-and-paste in three formats (MLA, APA, Chicago).
Is
14 matches
Mail list logo
