Re: [Wikimedia-l] US affiliates (was: Re: WMF office location and remodel)

2015-06-28 Thread Gerard Meijssen
Hoi, Hear, hear !! Thanks, GerardM On 28 June 2015 at 12:44, Amir E. Aharoni wrote: > > The WMF will become a truly global organization when a Wikimedia US > > chapter is founded ;-) > W > Not quite, but it would be an important step in that direction. Work on USA > projects should be done

Re: [Wikimedia-l] US affiliates (was: Re: WMF office location and remodel)

2015-06-28 Thread Amir E. Aharoni
> The WMF will become a truly global organization when a Wikimedia US > chapter is founded ;-) W Not quite, but it would be an important step in that direction. Work on USA projects should be done by USA Wikimedia chapters and other USA organization, not by the Foundation. It used to be worse in t

Re: [Wikimedia-l] US affiliates (was: Re: WMF office location and remodel)

2015-06-28 Thread Gerard Meijssen
Hoi, The United States is not singular in its size, its diversity, the number of people. Arguably India, Brazil and Russia compare. The one difference the USA has is its historic attention from the WMF in every aspect of its operations. Arguably, the WMF has performed many of what would be expect

Re: [Wikimedia-l] US affiliates (was: Re: WMF office location and remodel)

2015-06-27 Thread Keegan Peterzell
On Sun, Jun 28, 2015 at 12:34 AM, Risker wrote: > Ricordisamoa, I have no preference either way. I live in a geographically > enormous country (Canada), which has a national chapter - centered so far > away from me that I'll never be in a position to participate in person at a > regular meetup. I

Re: [Wikimedia-l] US affiliates (was: Re: WMF office location and remodel)

2015-06-27 Thread Risker
Ricordisamoa, I have no preference either way. I live in a geographically enormous country (Canada), which has a national chapter - centered so far away from me that I'll never be in a position to participate in person at a regular meetup. In Canada's case, regional chapters might have been better,

Re: [Wikimedia-l] US affiliates (was: Re: WMF office location and remodel)

2015-06-27 Thread Ricordisamoa
I infer that you would have preferred a single US chapter from the start, wouldn't you? Il 28/06/2015 06:08, Risker ha scritto: Ironically, Ricordisamoa, the "decision" to not have a US chapter was made around 10 years ago at the strong urging of other chapters. The theory (as I understand it)

Re: [Wikimedia-l] US affiliates (was: Re: WMF office location and remodel)

2015-06-27 Thread Risker
Ironically, Ricordisamoa, the "decision" to not have a US chapter was made around 10 years ago at the strong urging of other chapters. The theory (as I understand it) was that the US was the home of the WMF itself, which in the view of the era, meant that the US didn't need the "protections" that c

Re: [Wikimedia-l] US affiliates (was: Re: WMF office location and remodel)

2015-06-27 Thread Ricordisamoa
I know the confederated approach may surely make more sense for the local communities, but I think an established regional subject would help uproot the Foundation from a single country it relies too much on. Il 28/06/2015 05:00, Pine W ha scritto: Hi Ricordisamoa, There are multiple chapter

[Wikimedia-l] US affiliates (was: Re: WMF office location and remodel)

2015-06-27 Thread Pine W
Hi Ricordisamoa, There are multiple chapters, user groups and thematic organizations that are active in the US and have a degree of separation from WMF. The US affiliates are cooperative with each other, and the affiliate leaders communicate with each other fairly frequently. May I ask what benefi