Asaf,
Please be assured that the community is capable of separating real feedback
from criticism with an agenda.
We do also always intervene to uphold the diginity of the community when a
discussion gets too personal and incivil.
However, the recent comments made by Ansuman has brought few
Here it's
writtenhttps://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Grants:APG/FDC_portal/Appeals_to_the_Board_on_the_recommendations_of_the_FDC#Ombudsperson_feedback
about
Anasuya's involvement.
If there is a COI issue, why is she involved now? Why did she visited India
officially to meet CISA2K?
To Anusuaya,
Thanks for this constructive invitation. I look forward to this
conversation, and I commit to contribute to it, as invited, from my
perspective, once some community members have offered opinions.
One point I'd beg to differ on, though, right from the start, is your
suggestion that WMIN focus on
Hi Ravi,
Thanks for bringing this up.
I was wrong in believing that WMF and CIS would actively take part on this
while making the report, but none of the full time paid people seem to be
interested. Wikimedia India would take it up, but the report will
completely one-sided, thus requesting the
Dear Ravi,
Thanks for flagging this. You did send an earlier reminder about this,
but we completely got consumed by the work planning and the FDC proposal
and could not get to this. Apologies!
Will share the draft soon and will request friends from WMIN EC to
contribute to it.
Cheers,
Hi All,
This is something to watch out:
http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/home/lok-sabha-elections-2014/news/After-Facebook-and-Twitter-online-poll-war-breaks-out-on-Wikipedia/articleshow/3388.cms
regards
Abhijith
_Abhijith JayanthiE:
Hi Karthik,
I think our mails crossed. We will take lead in sharing a draft with you
and other in the EC for your inputs, soon.
Best,
Vishnu
On Friday 18 April 2014 12:40 PM, Karthik Nadar wrote:
Hi Ravi,
Thanks for bringing this up.
I was wrong in believing that WMF and CIS would
Thank you Vishnu,
That really helps!
On Fri, Apr 18, 2014 at 12:52 PM, Vishnu visdav...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Karthik,
I think our mails crossed. We will take lead in sharing a draft with you
and other in the EC for your inputs, soon.
Best,
Vishnu
On Friday 18 April 2014 12:40 PM,
Hi Shymal,
I think it really makes sense to travel next step in terms of
collaborating. Thanks for sharing this. India Chapter would also explore
the possibilities to be part of the event.
Thanks again!
On Wed, Apr 16, 2014 at 9:46 PM, Vishnu visdav...@gmail.com wrote:
Dear Shyamal,
Hi Asaf,
Let me put everything aside and ask a few simple questions to you, as I see
you as a representative of WMF here.
1. Why was WMIN denied the large portion of the grant requested and why do
we have separate grant to a private organisation?
2. WMF have seen the results of previous funding
Hi Dhaval, Lets hope ! May be WMF will answer the you questions specific.
Regards,
Jayanta Nath
On Fri, Apr 18, 2014 at 4:46 PM, Dhaval S. Vyas dsv...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Asaf,
Let me put everything aside and ask a few simple questions to you, as I
see you as a representative of WMF here.
Dhaval,
Asaf has been answering questions on these lines and the discussion is
continuing at
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Grants_talk:APG/Proposals/2013-2014_round2/The_Centre_for_Internet_and_Society/Proposal_form#Q3a.
Follow the questions Q3b and Q3c too.
Let us please participate in the
Hi Ravi,
Thanks for asking this question. As I said when we had our IRC
conversation, our understanding with all those we have visited during this
past year has been that we will not do official site reports at this time
beyond a financial review for the Audit Committee, instead creating shared
Hi Ansuman,
I think I've made clear on the CIS talk page what the process for the CIS
transition was, as best as I am able. Since neither Asaf or I were directly
involved at the start, it is difficult for us to give the community details
we do not know.
The so-called Conflict of Interest issue
14 matches
Mail list logo
