HI Vikram Vincent.
On Sat, Apr 19, 2014 at 5:33 PM, Vikram Vincent vincentvik...@gmail.comwrote:
Such apprehensions exist in all communities where there are volunteers
and employees whether the Linux kernel, GCC, LibC, Wikipedia, etc..
Wikipedia is unique in many aspects and should not be
Thanks Anasuya. I believe you, and I understand your points.
But the facts (some are getting out at proposal talk page) were not told
before, which should have been told much earlier.
Even the WMF's intent is not transparent about this particular project. You
can see many questions being asked
Hi!
On 19 April 2014 16:36, ansuman ansum...@gmail.com wrote:
snip
And it looks like no matter what volunteers ask, say; irrespective of their
concerns, the decisions are final or have been made. To put it in another
way, the paid employees outweigh volunteers. That's all. Thanks.
Such
Yes, you're right. But I was talking specifically about this project in
making decisions.
This percept by Pradeep at proposal talk page sums it up;
//I see no point in community engagement with this proposal to improve it
without the knowledge of WMF's assessment. Trying to make improvements
Here it's
writtenhttps://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Grants:APG/FDC_portal/Appeals_to_the_Board_on_the_recommendations_of_the_FDC#Ombudsperson_feedback
about
Anasuya's involvement.
If there is a COI issue, why is she involved now? Why did she visited India
officially to meet CISA2K?
To Anusuaya,
Hi Ansuman,
I think I've made clear on the CIS talk page what the process for the CIS
transition was, as best as I am able. Since neither Asaf or I were directly
involved at the start, it is difficult for us to give the community details
we do not know.
The so-called Conflict of Interest issue
