*We can confirm that Roger Bamkin, an ex-Director of Wikimedia UK, is one
of two individuals who continue to provide advice on the production of the
QR codes and training for volunteer contributors to Gibraltar's Wikipedia
site. These two individuals were also involved in Monmouth's Wikipedia
proj
Thanks Roger for more than a year of service. It's disappointing to see him
finally go - his encouraging words in Bristol and Haifa last year (along
the lines of "you need balls to be cool and do outreach") was what kept me
going in my Wikimedia outreach despite all kinds of disappointment.
[cynic
Unfortunately Fiona is not really able to do this at the moment. I'm going
to help her contact them (as her husband) and make the corrections.
Richard Symonds
Wikimedia UK
0207 065 0992
Wikimedia UK is a Company Limited by Guarantee registered in England and
Wales, Registered No. 6741827. Registe
I'd get back to the guy, and ask him to make the necessary corrections.
It's not paper, and he's already realised that Gibraltar is not an island.
:)
Andreas
On Thu, Sep 20, 2012 at 7:01 PM, User Panyd wrote:
> I gave Slate an interview in the hopes of being the first non-crazy person
> to talk
I gave Slate an interview in the hopes of being the first non-crazy person
to talk about what Roger is *actually doing* - which, yes, I still have
problems with - but which isn't being Scrooge McDuck using WMUK to grab all
the money in the land whilst writing all the articles about Gibraltar
himsel
Thank you, Roger. I regret that you have chosen your work with the
government of Gibraltar over your work with Wikimedia UK, but we all have
to eat!
On Sep 20, 2012 5:57 PM, "Chris Keating"
wrote:
> Dear all,
>
> We have posted two items on the Wikimedia UK blog today, one announcing
> the appoin
On 20 September 2012 17:57, Chris Keating
wrote:
> Wikimedia UK would like to announce that Roger Bamkin has stepped down as a
> Trustee.
How terribly sad (and unfortunately worded).
--
Andy Mabbett
@pigsonthewing
http://pigsonthewing.org.uk
___
Wik
A victory for the trolls who wish the project ill.
On Sep 20, 2012 5:57 PM, "Chris Keating"
wrote:
> Dear all,
>
> We have posted two items on the Wikimedia UK blog today, one announcing
> the appointment of Saad Choudri as a co-opted Trustee, the other announcing
> the resignation of Roger Bamki
Grow up you moron Andreas
This talk was in September 2011 I know I was there -Roger had no
consultancy till this year (2012) so what was he selling oxygen, snake
oil? Monmouthpedia did not exist it was many months way. Vouchers were
given for free by museums to encourage people to ed
Dear all,
We have posted two items on the Wikimedia UK blog today, one announcing the
appointment of Saad Choudri as a co-opted Trustee, the other announcing the
resignation of Roger Bamkin.
The text of the statements is as follows, and they can also be seen online
at: http://blog.wikimedia.org.u
Here is a video of a presentation openly selling the SEO value of
Wikipedia, and Wikipedia front page appearances, in the name of Wikimedia
UK:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rO6ZrWJeaOM
Quotes:
"Can we help put Bristol on the global map longer term, that's why we want
to talk to you today." [3.
On Sep 20, 2012 4:27 PM, "Andreas Kolbe" wrote:
>
> On Thu, Sep 20, 2012 at 4:19 PM, James Farrar
wrote:
>>
>>
>> On Sep 20, 2012 12:21 PM, "Andreas Kolbe" wrote:
>> >
>> > Regardless of whether there is impropriety or not, it is hardly
possible to claim that the appearance of impropriety has be
On 20 September 2012 16:19, James Farrar wrote:
> And let's say Roger does resign: who's the next target on your list?
Steve Virgin appears to be their next target.
- d.
___
Wikimedia UK mailing list
wikimediau...@wikimedia.org
http://mail.wikimedi
On Thu, Sep 20, 2012 at 4:19 PM, James Farrar wrote:
>
> On Sep 20, 2012 12:21 PM, "Andreas Kolbe" wrote:
> >
> > Regardless of whether there is impropriety or not, it is hardly possible
> to claim that the appearance of impropriety has been avoided.
>
> For someone in the public eye, no matter h
Seen this? http://www.theregister.co.uk/2012/09/20/wikimedia_uk_scandal/
James
Trolls just like thrill of tearing things down they live for it
Steve
From: wikimediauk-l-boun...@lists.wikimedia.org
[mailto:wikimediauk-l-boun...@lists.wikimedia.org] On Behalf Of James Farrar
Sent:
On Sep 20, 2012 12:21 PM, "Andreas Kolbe" wrote:
>
> Regardless of whether there is impropriety or not, it is hardly possible
to claim that the appearance of impropriety has been avoided.
For someone in the public eye, no matter how properly they behave, a person
with an axe to grind can always s
Correct Harry. Although the QRpedia and training bit comes in too.
R
On 20 September 2012 14:28, HJ Mitchell wrote:
> Very well said.
>
> This is an important issue, and it's quite right for the members to
> discuss it, but they could do so in a way that smacks slightly less of a
> vendetta. An
Very well said.
This is an important issue, and it's quite right for the members to discuss it,
but they could do so in a way that smacks slightly less of a vendetta. And if
the campaign to force Roger to stand down succeeds, we will rapidly find
ourselves with an alarmingly small board.
For m
On Wed, Sep 19, 2012 at 2:33 PM, Craig Franklin
wrote:
> Good grief, the only way that someone could come to that conclusion
> from what you've quoted is if they had a rather severe case of
> paranoia or were overly fond of conspiracy theories. Teaching people
> how to use Wikipedia, what villain
On 20/09/2012 02:46, Chris McKenna wrote:
In the messages I've read (not all), it has been stated at least twice
that the process transferring this to WMUK (i.e. exactly what is being
asked for) is ongoing, and has been for some time (held up by
complicated legal issues, rather than a lack of de
A response to this from the office.
I hope that nobody who has expressed genuine views about a matter they find
of concern, and who does it in a polite and measured way, would ever feel
cold shouldered or excluded from WMUK activities discussions or events.
This is a form of bullying and if it h
21 matches
Mail list logo