Re: [Wikimediauk-l] Paid editing by Roger Bamkin

2012-09-20 Thread Roger Bamkin
*We can confirm that Roger Bamkin, an ex-Director of Wikimedia UK, is one of two individuals who continue to provide advice on the production of the QR codes and training for volunteer contributors to Gibraltar's Wikipedia site. These two individuals were also involved in Monmouth's Wikipedia proj

Re: [Wikimediauk-l] Board news

2012-09-20 Thread Deryck Chan
Thanks Roger for more than a year of service. It's disappointing to see him finally go - his encouraging words in Bristol and Haifa last year (along the lines of "you need balls to be cool and do outreach") was what kept me going in my Wikimedia outreach despite all kinds of disappointment. [cynic

Re: [Wikimediauk-l] Paid editing by Roger Bamkin

2012-09-20 Thread Richard Symonds
Unfortunately Fiona is not really able to do this at the moment. I'm going to help her contact them (as her husband) and make the corrections. Richard Symonds Wikimedia UK 0207 065 0992 Wikimedia UK is a Company Limited by Guarantee registered in England and Wales, Registered No. 6741827. Registe

Re: [Wikimediauk-l] Paid editing by Roger Bamkin

2012-09-20 Thread Andreas Kolbe
I'd get back to the guy, and ask him to make the necessary corrections. It's not paper, and he's already realised that Gibraltar is not an island. :) Andreas On Thu, Sep 20, 2012 at 7:01 PM, User Panyd wrote: > I gave Slate an interview in the hopes of being the first non-crazy person > to talk

Re: [Wikimediauk-l] Paid editing by Roger Bamkin

2012-09-20 Thread User Panyd
I gave Slate an interview in the hopes of being the first non-crazy person to talk about what Roger is *actually doing* - which, yes, I still have problems with - but which isn't being Scrooge McDuck using WMUK to grab all the money in the land whilst writing all the articles about Gibraltar himsel

Re: [Wikimediauk-l] Board news

2012-09-20 Thread Thomas Dalton
Thank you, Roger. I regret that you have chosen your work with the government of Gibraltar over your work with Wikimedia UK, but we all have to eat! On Sep 20, 2012 5:57 PM, "Chris Keating" wrote: > Dear all, > > We have posted two items on the Wikimedia UK blog today, one announcing > the appoin

Re: [Wikimediauk-l] Board news

2012-09-20 Thread Andy Mabbett
On 20 September 2012 17:57, Chris Keating wrote: > Wikimedia UK would like to announce that Roger Bamkin has stepped down as a > Trustee. How terribly sad (and unfortunately worded). -- Andy Mabbett @pigsonthewing http://pigsonthewing.org.uk ___ Wik

Re: [Wikimediauk-l] Board news

2012-09-20 Thread James Farrar
A victory for the trolls who wish the project ill. On Sep 20, 2012 5:57 PM, "Chris Keating" wrote: > Dear all, > > We have posted two items on the Wikimedia UK blog today, one announcing > the appointment of Saad Choudri as a co-opted Trustee, the other announcing > the resignation of Roger Bamki

Re: [Wikimediauk-l] Paid editing by Roger Bamkin

2012-09-20 Thread steve virgin
Grow up you moron Andreas – This talk was in September 2011 – I know I was there -Roger had no consultancy till this year (2012) so what was he “selling” oxygen, snake oil? Monmouthpedia did not exist it was many months way. Vouchers were given for free by museums to encourage people to ed

[Wikimediauk-l] Board news

2012-09-20 Thread Chris Keating
Dear all, We have posted two items on the Wikimedia UK blog today, one announcing the appointment of Saad Choudri as a co-opted Trustee, the other announcing the resignation of Roger Bamkin. The text of the statements is as follows, and they can also be seen online at: http://blog.wikimedia.org.u

Re: [Wikimediauk-l] Paid editing by Roger Bamkin

2012-09-20 Thread Andreas Kolbe
Here is a video of a presentation openly selling the SEO value of Wikipedia, and Wikipedia front page appearances, in the name of Wikimedia UK: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rO6ZrWJeaOM Quotes: "Can we help put Bristol on the global map longer term, that's why we want to talk to you today." [3.

Re: [Wikimediauk-l] Paid editing by Roger Bamkin

2012-09-20 Thread James Farrar
On Sep 20, 2012 4:27 PM, "Andreas Kolbe" wrote: > > On Thu, Sep 20, 2012 at 4:19 PM, James Farrar wrote: >> >> >> On Sep 20, 2012 12:21 PM, "Andreas Kolbe" wrote: >> > >> > Regardless of whether there is impropriety or not, it is hardly possible to claim that the appearance of impropriety has be

Re: [Wikimediauk-l] Paid editing by Roger Bamkin

2012-09-20 Thread David Gerard
On 20 September 2012 16:19, James Farrar wrote: > And let's say Roger does resign: who's the next target on your list? Steve Virgin appears to be their next target. - d. ___ Wikimedia UK mailing list wikimediau...@wikimedia.org http://mail.wikimedi

Re: [Wikimediauk-l] Paid editing by Roger Bamkin

2012-09-20 Thread Andreas Kolbe
On Thu, Sep 20, 2012 at 4:19 PM, James Farrar wrote: > > On Sep 20, 2012 12:21 PM, "Andreas Kolbe" wrote: > > > > Regardless of whether there is impropriety or not, it is hardly possible > to claim that the appearance of impropriety has been avoided. > > For someone in the public eye, no matter h

Re: [Wikimediauk-l] Paid editing by Roger Bamkin

2012-09-20 Thread steve virgin
Seen this? http://www.theregister.co.uk/2012/09/20/wikimedia_uk_scandal/ James Trolls just like thrill of tearing things down they live for it Steve From: wikimediauk-l-boun...@lists.wikimedia.org [mailto:wikimediauk-l-boun...@lists.wikimedia.org] On Behalf Of James Farrar Sent:

Re: [Wikimediauk-l] Paid editing by Roger Bamkin

2012-09-20 Thread James Farrar
On Sep 20, 2012 12:21 PM, "Andreas Kolbe" wrote: > > Regardless of whether there is impropriety or not, it is hardly possible to claim that the appearance of impropriety has been avoided. For someone in the public eye, no matter how properly they behave, a person with an axe to grind can always s

Re: [Wikimediauk-l] Paid editing by Roger Bamkin

2012-09-20 Thread Roger Bamkin
Correct Harry. Although the QRpedia and training bit comes in too. R On 20 September 2012 14:28, HJ Mitchell wrote: > Very well said. > > This is an important issue, and it's quite right for the members to > discuss it, but they could do so in a way that smacks slightly less of a > vendetta. An

Re: [Wikimediauk-l] Paid editing by Roger Bamkin

2012-09-20 Thread HJ Mitchell
Very well said. This is an important issue, and it's quite right for the members to discuss it, but they could do so in a way that smacks slightly less of a vendetta. And if the campaign to force Roger to stand down succeeds, we will rapidly find ourselves with an alarmingly small board. For m

Re: [Wikimediauk-l] Paid editing by Roger Bamkin

2012-09-20 Thread Andreas Kolbe
On Wed, Sep 19, 2012 at 2:33 PM, Craig Franklin wrote: > Good grief, the only way that someone could come to that conclusion > from what you've quoted is if they had a rather severe case of > paranoia or were overly fond of conspiracy theories. Teaching people > how to use Wikipedia, what villain

Re: [Wikimediauk-l] Paid editing by Roger Bamkin

2012-09-20 Thread Katie Chan
On 20/09/2012 02:46, Chris McKenna wrote: In the messages I've read (not all), it has been stated at least twice that the process transferring this to WMUK (i.e. exactly what is being asked for) is ongoing, and has been for some time (held up by complicated legal issues, rather than a lack of de

Re: [Wikimediauk-l] Paid editing by Roger Bamkin

2012-09-20 Thread Jon Davies
A response to this from the office. I hope that nobody who has expressed genuine views about a matter they find of concern, and who does it in a polite and measured way, would ever feel cold shouldered or excluded from WMUK activities discussions or events. This is a form of bullying and if it h