There was
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Cambridge_University_Wikipedia_Society/November_2012_gatheringin
November too :)
Deryck
On 8 December 2012 03:43, Andy Mabbett wrote:
> On 4 December 2012 13:56, Stevie Benton
> wrote:
>
> > Work has begun on compiling Wikimedia UK's November act
On 4 December 2012 13:56, Stevie Benton wrote:
> Work has begun on compiling Wikimedia UK's November activity report. If you
> were involved in any Wikimedia UK activity throughout the month, please do
> add some details to the page.
I've added my activities; though to be clear, most had no invo
On 7 December 2012 17:33, Chris Keating wrote:
> What we can't have is a situation where someone on (say) a GLAM Committee is
> helping make decisions about where Wikimedia UK is seeking to appoint
> Wikimedians in Residence, or what their contract should say, and then
> applying for one of those
There is a difference between contributing to the public discussion on a
topic and being party of the committee making decisions on it. Jon's email
was much broader than just sitting on committees.
On Dec 7, 2012 5:33 PM, "Chris Keating" wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 7, 2012 at 3:38 PM, Thomas Dalton wrot
On Fri, Dec 7, 2012 at 3:38 PM, Thomas Dalton wrote:
>
> True, but don't want to through the baby out with the bathwater. We
> need, as a community, to learn how to manage conflicts of interest. We
> can't just avoid them.
Indeed. Part of that is separating decision-making from any benefit that
*Throw*, even - my fingers like to type (near-)homophones...
On 7 December 2012 15:38, Thomas Dalton wrote:
> On 7 December 2012 15:33, Jon Davies wrote:
>> We live in difficult times
>
> True, but don't want to through the baby out with the bathwater. We
> need, as a community, to learn how
On 7 December 2012 15:33, Jon Davies wrote:
> We live in difficult times
True, but don't want to through the baby out with the bathwater. We
need, as a community, to learn how to manage conflicts of interest. We
can't just avoid them.
___
Wikimedia
We live in difficult times
On 7 December 2012 15:25, Thomas Dalton wrote:
> That seems a bit excessive. Those are precisely the people that could have
> very valuable input in the discussions. As long as they declare the
> interest, I don't see a problem.
> On Dec 7, 2012 3:09 PM, "Jon Davie
That seems a bit excessive. Those are precisely the people that could have
very valuable input in the discussions. As long as they declare the
interest, I don't see a problem.
On Dec 7, 2012 3:09 PM, "Jon Davies" wrote:
> Chris Keating and I had a chat about Volunteer Declarations of Interest
> a
Chris Keating and I had a chat about Volunteer Declarations of Interest and
agreed that it might be worth reminding active members that if they have
any intention of applying for roles that are coming up, e.g. Wikipedian in
Residence posts it would be prudent to refrain from commenting on any of
th
Dear everyone,
No easy way to say this
I have had a complaint from someone who wishes to remain anonymous.
It is about personal hygiene.
Can people delivering training or being active at events make sure that
they are freshly scrubbed up!
Apparently we have one person who is less aware of thei
11 matches
Mail list logo
