On 21/03/2012 16:50, Gordon Joly wrote:
On 21/03/2012 10:41, Jon Davies wrote:
There are 114 very detailed questions (reminds me of a nightmare
before finals)- we will be offering a broad brush answer.
I can see the logic of that.
:-)
Gordo
I think what I was suggesting was to scan the
Hopefully a positive one!
Quoting Gordon Joly gordon.j...@pobox.com:
On 21/03/2012 16:50, Gordon Joly wrote:
On 21/03/2012 10:41, Jon Davies wrote:
There are 114 very detailed questions (reminds me of a nightmare
before finals)- we will be offering a broad brush answer.
I can see the logic
Yes, indeed. I always like asking people to do some work
:-)
In particular, Daria's role in the training and other events has been
novel, and positive.
With four of you in the office, I am lucky to able to pop in for a chat
(living a few miles away)... and the Boris Bike docking
Sounds like a good idea, but possibly best timed when there are more
people around than just the staff - we don't really have time to edit
Wikipedia articles much these days!
Richard Symonds
Office Development Manager
Wikimedia UK
+44 (0) 207 065 0992
--
Wikimedia UK is the operating name of
On 22/03/2012 11:31, Richard Symonds wrote:
Sounds like a good idea, but possibly best timed when there are more
people around than just the staff - we don't really have time to edit
Wikipedia articles much these days!
This is a walk in your *lunch hour*. Unless, of course, you don't have
http://uk.wikimedia.org/wiki/Intellectual_Property_Office_Consultation
Comments please on this - seems like Tom was spot on.
--
Jon Davies - Chief Executive Wikimedia UK. 07976 935 986
tweet @jonatreesdavies
Wikimedia UK is the operating name of Wiki UK Limited.
Wiki UK Ltd is a Company
On 21 March 2012 09:37, Jon Davies jon.dav...@wikimedia.org.uk wrote:
http://uk.wikimedia.org/wiki/Intellectual_Property_Office_Consultation
Comments please on this - seems like Tom was spot on.
Looks right to me. Has Tom got time this morning to write up something from it?
- d.
I will do it.
Quoting David Gerard dger...@gmail.com:
On 21 March 2012 09:37, Jon Davies jon.dav...@wikimedia.org.uk wrote:
http://uk.wikimedia.org/wiki/Intellectual_Property_Office_Consultation
Comments please on this - seems like Tom was spot on.
Looks right to me. Has Tom got time this
Does a response need to reference the question numbers in the
consultation document?
Gordo
On 21/03/2012 10:09, Jon Davies wrote:
I will do it.
Quoting David Gerard dger...@gmail.com:
On 21 March 2012 09:37, Jon Davies jon.dav...@wikimedia.org.uk wrote:
There are 114 very detailed questions (reminds me of a nightmare
before finals)- we will be offering a broad brush answer.
Quoting Gordon Joly gordon.j...@pobox.com:
Does a response need to reference the question numbers in the
consultation document?
Gordo
On 21/03/2012 10:09, Jon
On Mar 21, 2012 10:00 AM, David Gerard dger...@gmail.com wrote:
On 21 March 2012 09:37, Jon Davies jon.dav...@wikimedia.org.uk wrote:
http://uk.wikimedia.org/wiki/Intellectual_Property_Office_Consultation
Comments please on this - seems like Tom was spot on.
Looks right to me. Has Tom
On Wednesday, 21 March 2012 at 10:41, Jon Davies wrote:
There are 114 very detailed questions (reminds me of a nightmare
before finals)- we will be offering a broad brush answer.
Quoting Gordon Joly gordon.j...@pobox.com (mailto:gordon.j...@pobox.com):
Does a response need to reference the
I've tweaked it a bit. There was an unclosed bracket on section 2 and
the last sentence looked stray; please check my change is close to
what you meant.
I'm not sure I understand our section 3.
- d.
___
Wikimedia UK mailing list
I'm just doing some tweaking too. ;-)
--
Tom Morris
http://tommorris.org/
___
Wikimedia UK mailing list
wikimediau...@wikimedia.org
http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l
WMUK: http://uk.wikimedia.org
I'm not sure I understand our section 3.
I tweaked that to read a little more clearly (sorry Tom if I missed the
point you were making). Although as Mike mentions on the talk page - some
of the bullets only mention areas of interest, they don't make points. #3
could probably do with someone
Also; does it need a brief introduction to explain who we are and what our
general stance is?
On 21 March 2012 11:50, Thomas Morton morton.tho...@googlemail.com wrote:
I'm not sure I understand our section 3.
I tweaked that to read a little more clearly (sorry Tom if I missed the
point you
On Wednesday, 21 March 2012 at 11:52, Thomas Morton wrote:
Also; does it need a brief introduction to explain who we are and what our
general stance is?
Yep, most probably. I've attempted to make so many edits to fix up the grammar
and so on, but have gone into a mad house of edit conflicts.
Sorry, that was probably me - I'll go onto the talk page.
When do we *have* to send this in? 12?
Tom
(sorry, I should have done this yesterday :S)
On 21 March 2012 11:57, Tom Morris t...@tommorris.org wrote:
On Wednesday, 21 March 2012 at 11:52, Thomas Morton wrote:
Also; does it need a
I can paste something out of our general pages.
Quoting Thomas Morton morton.tho...@googlemail.com:
Also; does it need a brief introduction to explain who we are and what our
general stance is?
On 21 March 2012 11:50, Thomas Morton morton.tho...@googlemail.com wrote:
I'm not sure I
On 21/03/2012 10:41, Jon Davies wrote:
There are 114 very detailed questions (reminds me of a nightmare
before finals)- we will be offering a broad brush answer.
I can see the logic of that.
:-)
Gordo
--
Gordon Joly
gordon.j...@pobox.com
http://www.joly.org.uk/
Don't Leave Space To The
Completely missed this (*I went to work!) but it looks very good. Well gone
all
On 21 March 2012 09:37, Jon Davies jon.dav...@wikimedia.org.uk wrote:
http://uk.wikimedia.org/wiki/**Intellectual_Property_Office_**Consultationhttp://uk.wikimedia.org/wiki/Intellectual_Property_Office_Consultation
21 matches
Mail list logo
