On 7 April 2014 18:29, Michael Peel wrote:
>
> On 7 Apr 2014, at 16:21, Charles Matthews
> wrote:
>
> > On 7 April 2014 16:08, Michael Peel
> wrote:
> >
> > On 7 Apr 2014, at 15:12, Andy Mabbett wrote:
> >
> > > On 7 April 2014 13:11, Roger Bamkin wrote:
> > >
> > >> Bar liam.
> > >
> > > Lia
On 7 Apr 2014, at 16:21, Charles Matthews
wrote:
> On 7 April 2014 16:08, Michael Peel wrote:
>
> On 7 Apr 2014, at 15:12, Andy Mabbett wrote:
>
> > On 7 April 2014 13:11, Roger Bamkin wrote:
> >
> >> Bar liam.
> >
> > Liam was the first WiiR, but not, I understand, in conjunction with WMU
On 7 April 2014 16:08, Michael Peel wrote:
>
> On 7 Apr 2014, at 15:12, Andy Mabbett wrote:
>
>> On 7 April 2014 13:11, Roger Bamkin wrote:
>>
>>> Bar liam.
>>
>> Liam was the first WiiR, but not, I understand, in conjunction with WMUK.
>
> That depends on what you mean by 'conjunction with'. He
On 7 April 2014 17:16, John Byrne wrote:
> Oh dear, I seem to have started this by referring flippantly to the meeting
> as a "summit" in an email to Ed Saperia about the early-June Barbican event,
> which I cc'd to Andy as he has signed up on the page for that.
Actually. no. I'd already heard ab
Oh dear, I seem to have started this by referring flippantly to the
meeting as a "summit" in an email to Ed Saperia about the early-June
Barbican event, which I cc'd to Andy as he has signed up on the page for
that. The term was entirely my own invention for that email, and not
used by anyone b
On 7 April 2014 16:08, Michael Peel wrote:
>
> On 7 Apr 2014, at 15:12, Andy Mabbett wrote:
>
> > On 7 April 2014 13:11, Roger Bamkin wrote:
> >
> >> Bar liam.
> >
> > Liam was the first WiiR, but not, I understand, in conjunction with WMUK.
>
> That depends on what you mean by 'conjunction wit
On 7 Apr 2014, at 15:12, Andy Mabbett wrote:
> On 7 April 2014 13:11, Roger Bamkin wrote:
>
>> Bar liam.
>
> Liam was the first WiiR, but not, I understand, in conjunction with WMUK.
That depends on what you mean by 'conjunction with'. He was certainly 'liaising
with', and it was an achieve
On 7 April 2014 13:11, Roger Bamkin wrote:
> Hmmm I thought I met Andy in Derby
Certainly true.
> where I was the first WMUK person in a museum
I understood that was on your own initiative, rather then as a WMUK
project. Happy to be corrected!
> Bar liam.
Liam was the first WiiR, but not
Your input would be welcome in any form Andy.
On 7 April 2014 13:39, Andy Mabbett wrote:
> "
> On 7 April 2014 11:00, Jon Davies wrote:
>
> > people who had been/are employed as WiR
> > plus one other person who had been
> > heavily involved in the employment and a trustee.
>
> Jon, In recent
"
On 7 April 2014 11:00, Jon Davies wrote:
> people who had been/are employed as WiR
> plus one other person who had been
> heavily involved in the employment and a trustee.
Jon, In recent weeks, we've had a consultation which was launched by
staff member claiming that "as a chapter we have run
Hmmm I thought I met Andy in Derby where I was the first WMUK person in a
museum Bar liam.
Have I missed an earlier collaboration?
R
On 7 Apr 2014 15:02, "Chris McKenna" wrote:
> What information have you found about this event? I have been unable to
> verify its existence based on searches
I have created a separate thread on TTT. Apologies to others concerned
with the closed WIR summit / review - this is a tangent.
Fae
On 7 April 2014 11:15, Richard Nevell wrote:
> Regarding the Training the Trainers review, people who went on the course
> were invited to complete a survey. In fac
On 07/04/14 11:15, Richard Nevell wrote:
> 27 out of the 34 people invited to the survey replied.
Now that is good!
Gordon
___
Wikimedia UK mailing list
wikimediau...@wikimedia.org
http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l
WMUK: https
Regarding the Training the Trainers review, people who went on the course
were invited to complete a survey. In fact you were sent multiple emails
about it. 27 out of the 34 people invited to the survey replied.
On 7 April 2014 11:06, Fæ wrote:
> Thanks for your answers on this Jon. Nice to see
Thanks for your answers on this Jon. Nice to see you engaging with volunteers.
I seem to be left to answer my own question. I have to assume an
on-wiki page does not exist. The charity and the board of trustees is
100% committed to transparency and staying volunteer-centric. To
demonstrate that is
Internal is the sense that it was staff and people who had been/are
employed as WiR plus one other person who had been heavily involved in the
employment and a trustee.
When we reviewed Train the Trainers we followed a similar model of small
groups, individual interviews etc.
This was part of the
Hi Jon,
I'm confused - how can it be a 'small internal meeting' that also includes
people that aren't 'internal' to the WMUK office? And why, if it's an internal
meeting, did it take place on a weekend necessitating staff to give up their
Saturday?
Thanks,
Mike
On 7 Apr 2014, at 09:40, Jon Da
Good morning everybody,
Daria and I are puzzled as to why a small internal meeting gained the
status of a 'summit'!It was part of the analysis we are doing
particularly with regard to the UK sponsored WiR posts and one of a series
of processes. It involved people who had been paid by WMUK or c
What information have you found about this event? I have been unable to
verify its existence based on searches of google, WMF wikis and mailing
lists to which I am subscribed.
The closest I can come is Daria posting on the 17th March on the WMF
Outreach Wiki about WMUK's survey about WIR posit
Hi Andy,
I'm sure a member of staff will have a look tomorrow (I'm not in tomorrow),
but at first glance of the finance system, it appears that this may not
have taken place at WMUK, but be something that has happened elsewhere in
Europe. I say that because there are a lot of flights booked this w
Andy makes a good point. Could someone provide a link to the on-wiki
page about this meeting to resolve any questions?
Fae
On 6 April 2014 21:31, Andy Mabbett wrote:
> As a four-time[1] Wikipedian-in-Residence (indeed, as WMUK's first
> Wikipedian-in-Residence), I would be interested to know mor
As a four-time[1] Wikipedian-in-Residence (indeed, as WMUK's first
Wikipedian-in-Residence), I would be interested to know more about the
"Wikipedian-in-Residence summit", which was apparently held by WMUK
yesterday.
I don't seem to be able to find anything on the wiki, not even an event listing.
22 matches
Mail list logo
