: Re: [Wikimediauk-l] job descriptions
Dear all,
I'm not sure who gets this e-mail but I'd just like to say a few things to
as many Wikipedians as possible.
Imperial College Union has approved Wikipedians at Imperial College to be
the first official student UK Wikipedia soc
imediauk-l-boun...@lists.wikimedia.org] On Behalf Of Thomas Dalton
[thomas.dal...@gmail.com]
Sent: 27 February 2011 21:42
To: wikimediauk-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Subject: Re: [Wikimediauk-l] job descriptions
First of all, I'd like to say how thrilled I am to see this discussion
happening. A lac
First of all, I'd like to say how thrilled I am to see this discussion
happening. A lack of interest in the running of the chapter from
members has been one of my biggest concerns, so it is great to see
members discussing how the chapter is doing and holding the board the
account.
That, in fact, i
k-l-boun...@lists.wikimedia.org] On Behalf Of Chris Keating
Sent: 27 February 2011 19:43
To: wikimediauk-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Subject: Re: [Wikimediauk-l] job descriptions
Quite agree about the risks of large balances; hence we need a plan to increase
expenditure, which is what we have got.
>
Quite agree about the risks of large balances; hence we need a plan to increase
expenditure, which is what we have got.
> On the 20% thing, I accept that some of the stuff the staff do will be
> non-admin. But you still have to think about our relative efficiency compared
> to the WMF. Suppose
diauk-l-boun...@lists.wikimedia.org
[mailto:wikimediauk-l-boun...@lists.wikimedia.org] On Behalf Of Andrew Turvey
Sent: 27 February 2011 18:58
To: wikimediauk-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Subject: Re: [Wikimediauk-l] job descriptions
Thanks for your input, Tom - you raise some important points.
>
nd that money we clearly weren’t, so doing the second one
> really wasn’t in anyone’s best interest.
>
>
>
> Tom
>
>
>
> From: wikimediauk-l-boun...@lists.wikimedia.org
> [mailto:wikimediauk-l-boun...@lists.wikimedia.org] On Behalf Of Roger Bamkin
> Sent: 27 Februa
m.hol...@economics.ox.ac.uk
To: wikimediauk-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Date: Sun, 27 Feb 2011 17:28:30 +
Subject: Re: [Wikimediauk-l] job descriptions
I am looking at the budget. £123k on admin, £455k on programme expenditure, of
which £290k is going straight to the WMF anyway. Even assuming the WMF is
complet
ikimedia.org
[mailto:wikimediauk-l-boun...@lists.wikimedia.org] On Behalf Of Roger Bamkin
Sent: 27 February 2011 17:12
To: wikimediauk-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Subject: Re: [Wikimediauk-l] job descriptions
Tom, you are not comparing next years budget are you with last years activity?
Staff paid for last ye
re priorities.
>
> Tom
>
> -Original Message-
> From: wikimediauk-l-boun...@lists.wikimedia.org [mailto:
> wikimediauk-l-boun...@lists.wikimedia.org] On Behalf Of Andrew Turvey
> Sent: 27 February 2011 15:57
> To: WMUK-L
> Subject: [Wikimediauk-l] job descriptions
>
>
..@lists.wikimedia.org] On Behalf Of Andrew Turvey
Sent: 27 February 2011 15:57
To: WMUK-L
Subject: [Wikimediauk-l] job descriptions
In advance of the board meeting next Tuesday, I've started drafting up some job
descriptions on the wiki at http://uk.wikimedia.org/wiki/Job_Descriptions for
In advance of the board meeting next Tuesday, I've started drafting up
some job descriptions on the wiki at
http://uk.wikimedia.org/wiki/Job_Descriptions for the new members of
staff that we are recruiting.
Please add your contributions on the main and talk page to develop this.
Many thanks,
And
12 matches
Mail list logo
