Re: [Wikisource-l] Standardize ProofreadPage namespaces, again

2014-10-20 Thread David Cuenca
My impression is that nobody is going to care about it as long as it doesn't break anything. I would say that the best way to proceed would be to set up a date for an initial migration test with a small wikisource by sending them a notification in advance, and then repeat the procedure with the res

Re: [Wikisource-l] Standardize ProofreadPage namespaces, again

2014-10-20 Thread Nicolas VIGNERON
2014-10-20 2:51 GMT+02:00 Ricordisamoa : > About this RFC > , > John Vandenberg agreed to use the 250 / 252 pair for Page and Index > namespaces, respectively. > Is it wise to just go ahe

Re: [Wikisource-l] Standardize ProofreadPage namespaces, again

2014-10-20 Thread Thomas Tanon
Yes, it's a small detail for Wikisourcerors but not for tech people because it requires to update a lot of rows in the database. So, I think that the concertation should be done more with system administrators than with Wikisourcerors. As 250/252 are the default ids for Page/Index namespaces an

Re: [Wikisource-l] Standardize ProofreadPage namespaces, again

2014-10-20 Thread Wiki Billinghurst
Fully agree with Thomas's points. Find the right person within WMF to whom we need to talk. Get the defaults determined by them, and plugged into their configs. Then work with them to move sites to the config, fix up filters, etc. Bite size. I would suggest that on this matter we would be best t