Re: [Wikitech-l] image redirect bug

2009-01-14 Thread Jackey Tse
== Links == The following 2 files redirect to this file: *File:ARTI2.svg *File:ARTI.svg The following 2 pages link to this file: *File:ARTI2.svg *File:ARTI.svg duplicate link, bug? 2009/1/14 Marcus Buck w...@marcusbuck.org It seems, image redirects are somehow broken. You cannot view history

Re: [Wikitech-l] Search suggestions

2009-01-14 Thread Huji
Robert, That would be great. I'm also interested to know how non-Wikimedia wikis can setup a similar feature. If there is anywhere to learn about it, a link would suffice. Best, Hojjat (aka Huji) On 1/14/09, Robert Stojnic rainma...@gmail.com wrote: Hello, Sorry for late reply. I

Re: [Wikitech-l] Search suggestions

2009-01-14 Thread Robert Stojnic
The code is in the lucene-search-2.1 branch, but still needs some polishing/documenting to be widely usable.. I don't know when will I have time to polish this up, but you can give it a try for you local wiki anyway... The latest instructions are in the README file.

Re: [Wikitech-l] [MediaWiki-CVS] SVN: [45755] trunk/phase3 (IBM DB2 database layer)

2009-01-14 Thread Roan Kattouw
Just some basic comments, I'm sure Brion has more. leo...@svn.wikimedia.org schreef: Revision: 45755 Author: leonsp Date: 2009-01-14 22:20:15 + (Wed, 14 Jan 2009) Log Message: --- (bug 17028) Added support for IBM DB2 database. config/index.php has new interface

Re: [Wikitech-l] [MediaWiki-CVS] SVN: [45755] trunk/phase3 (IBM DB2 database layer)

2009-01-14 Thread Roan Kattouw
Aryeh Gregor schreef: On Wed, Jan 14, 2009 at 6:10 PM, Roan Kattouw roan.katt...@home.nl wrote: So DB2 renames LIMIT $n to something else and doesn't even implement offset handling, even though both are in the SQL specification? LIMIT/OFFSET are completely nonstandard. See, e.g.,

Re: [Wikitech-l] [MediaWiki-CVS] SVN: [45755] trunk/phase3 (IBM DB2 database layer)

2009-01-14 Thread Aryeh Gregor
On Wed, Jan 14, 2009 at 6:27 PM, Roan Kattouw roan.katt...@home.nl wrote: I knew about those, yes, but I didn't know LIMIT/OFFSET was non-standard, even though it seems to be the more widely used variant. Of course if offset handling isn't implemented at all, that's something to worry about.

Re: [Wikitech-l] [MediaWiki-CVS] SVN: [45755] trunk/phase3 (IBM DB2 database layer)

2009-01-14 Thread Tim Starling
Roan Kattouw wrote: Just some basic comments, I'm sure Brion has more. You should probably send them to CodeReview these days. +/** + * This represents a column in a DB2 database + * @ingroup Database + */ +class IBM_DB2Field { [...] Why do you need this? The other Database backends

Re: [Wikitech-l] [MediaWiki-CVS] SVN: [45755] trunk/phase3 (IBM DB2 database layer)

2009-01-14 Thread Chad
On Wed, Jan 14, 2009 at 6:27 PM, Roan Kattouw roan.katt...@home.nl wrote: [snip] I knew about those, yes, but I didn't know LIMIT/OFFSET was non-standard, even though it seems to be the more widely used variant. Of course if offset handling isn't implemented at all, that's something to worry