On Mon, Mar 2, 2009 at 4:26 PM, Tim Starling wrote:
>
> Options 1 and 2 are near enough to the same thing, since most of the
> sysadmins are part of the WMF. I'd be happy to enable it as proposed,
> on the basis of the poll, providing that Brion indicates that he has
> no objection to that action,
When trying to output a "book" as PDF, I got
"An error occured on the render server: error executing command
'render': [Errno 13] Permission denied:
'/opt/mwlib/var/cache/pdfserver/d/de' "
(To my layman's eye this looks like a general error, that was not
specifically caused by any of the articles
Further to that, when I try to output it via PediaPress, I get the
same error, though with "...command:'zip_post'"
On Mon, Mar 2, 2009 at 3:59 PM, Michael Bimmler wrote:
> When trying to output a "book" as PDF, I got
> "An error occured on the render server: error executing command
> 'render': [
On 3/1/09 4:16 PM, David Gerard wrote:
> What's the holdup in the flagged revisions trial on en:wp?
Last I heard, we're waiting for firm parameters on the test to be
decided on by the community.
-- brion
___
Wikitech-l mailing list
Wikitech-l@lists.wi
2009/3/1 David Gerard :
> What's the holdup in the flagged revisions trial on en:wp?
In general, there's a defined process for FlaggedRevs configurations,
which I laid out here when we first made this feature available:
http://lists.wikimedia.org/pipermail/foundation-l/2008-June/043691.html
This
2009/3/2 Erik Moeller :
> It's more important, IMO, to get this right than to just hastily roll
> out something that will then lead to opposition of the form
> "FlaggedRevs is horrible, let's get rid of it". We won't be able to
> make it perfect, but if we know the primary use cases in advance, we
2009/3/2 Brion Vibber :
> On 3/1/09 4:16 PM, David Gerard wrote:
>> What's the holdup in the flagged revisions trial on en:wp?
>
> Last I heard, we're waiting for firm parameters on the test to be
> decided on by the community.
If you accept the 59% result as sufficient consensus, then we have
tho
K. Peachey wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 2, 2009 at 3:19 PM, Aryeh Gregor
> wrote:
>> On Mon, Mar 2, 2009 at 12:15 AM, David Gerard wrote:
>>> The "shell" keyword was a new one to me.
>> It may or may not actually be necessary.
> For anything thats related to the maintaince of wiki's (eg: updating,
> chan
2009/3/2 David Gerard :
> - is that a "yes", "no", "maybe", "reply hazy try again later" or what?
It's a "no". The support was below typical "rough consensus" support
by Wikipedia standards, but bolstered by Jimmy's endorsement. Since
Jimmy later committed to attempting to formulate a counter-prop
On Tue, Mar 3, 2009 at 5:46 AM, Brion Vibber wrote:
> On 3/1/09 4:16 PM, David Gerard wrote:
>> What's the holdup in the flagged revisions trial on en:wp?
>
> Last I heard, we're waiting for firm parameters on the test to be
> decided on by the community.
The proposal that was put to the poll inc
Is this global, or just on a specific page? Currently unable to reproduce.
- Chris
On Mon, Mar 2, 2009 at 3:00 PM, Michael Bimmler wrote:
> Further to that, when I try to output it via PediaPress, I get the
> same error, though with "...command:'zip_post'"
>
>
> On Mon, Mar 2, 2009 at 3:59 PM,
11 matches
Mail list logo
