On Fri, Jul 24, 2009 at 2:52 AM, Brianna
Laugherbrianna.laug...@gmail.com wrote:
2009/7/24 Aryeh Gregor simetrical+wikil...@gmail.com:
On Thu, Jul 23, 2009 at 2:20 AM, Brianna
Laugherbrianna.laug...@gmail.com wrote:
All the potential problems posed are ones that Wikipedia faces every
day just
On Fri, Jul 24, 2009 at 2:23 AM, Teioscar.vi...@gmail.com wrote:
I dunno, a third input box name=botname?
input type=hidden name=botname /
I'm talking about in the case of a possibly malicious service, and
only if it's using OAuth (or whatever). Presumably if it's using
OAuth the user already
On Fri, Jul 24, 2009 at 2:24 AM, Tim Starlingtstarl...@wikimedia.org wrote:
There's plenty of ways to attack watchlistr without fully compromising
the server.
The point is that a system that allowed stealing the logins of
hundreds of Wikipedia users if you managed to compromise a third-party
On Wed, Jul 22, 2009 at 10:05 PM, Brianna
Laugherbrianna.laug...@gmail.com wrote:
[snip]
I can imagine someone building an alternative edit interface for a
subset of Wikipedia content, say a WikiProject. Then the interface can
strip away all the general crud and just provide information
On Fri, Jul 24, 2009 at 10:05 AM, dan nessett dness...@yahoo.com wrote:
So far no one has responded to Brion's comments about how parserTests
should be modified. You are the customers. What do you want?
My two cents: Remove the chronically failing tests and file them as bugs in
bugzilla. As
2009/7/24 Gregory Maxwell gmaxw...@gmail.com:
On Wed, Jul 22, 2009 at 10:05 PM, Brianna
Laugherbrianna.laug...@gmail.com wrote:
[snip]
I can imagine someone building an alternative edit interface for a
subset of Wikipedia content, say a WikiProject. Then the interface can
strip away all the
