Platonides wrote:
> You mention on bug 22624 the possibility of normalising the entire
> archive table to MW 1.5+ format.
> What are the chances of moving them back to revision and use revdelete
> for all deletions (removing archive table)?
>
> See bugs 18104, 21279, 18780.
Can you copy that qu
Let alone that, for some of us outside USA (and even with a good connection to
the EU resarch network) the download process takes, so to say, slightly more
time than expected (and is prone to errors as the file gets larger).
So other +1 to replace bzip with 7zip.
F.
--- El mar, 16/3/10, Kevin
--- El mar, 16/3/10, Kevin Webb escribió:
> De: Kevin Webb
> Asunto: Re: [Xmldatadumps-admin-l] 2010-03-11 01:10:08: enwiki Checksumming
> pages-meta-history.xml.bz2 :D
> Para: "Tomasz Finc"
> CC: "Wikimedia developers" ,
> xmldatadumps-admi...@lists.wikimedia.org, xmldatadump...@lists.wiki
On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 4:02 PM, Marco Schuster
wrote:
> I hope no one is ever insane enough to use this. Imagine those people
> with cellphones and no data transfer flat (~70% of mobile internet
> users) - their bills will skyrocket when even a single video is set to
> auto-preload.
On Wed, Mar
Date:
Wed, 17 Mar 2010 15:15:24 +0100
From: Platonides
Subject: Re: [Wikitech-l]
[Xmldatadumps-admin-l] 2010-03-11 01:10:08:
enwiki Checksumming
pages-meta-history.xml.bz2 :D
To: wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Message-ID:
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowe
On 03/17/2010 08:48 PM, Nimish Gautam wrote:
> Hey all,
>
> I wanted to change the "cite" extension to have some extra functionality.
>
> As citations have gotten more common, I've noticed an emerging use case
> where people will copy and paste text from wikipedia to HTML-enabled
> tools such a
Hey all,
I wanted to change the "cite" extension to have some extra functionality.
As citations have gotten more common, I've noticed an emerging use case
where people will copy and paste text from wikipedia to HTML-enabled
tools such as email clients or IM clients to share information.
Unfort
On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 9:11 PM, Trevor Parscal wrote:
> On 3/17/10 1:02 PM, Marco Schuster wrote:
>> On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 5:37 PM, Aryeh Gregor
>> wrote:
>>
>>> On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 10:39 AM, Platonides wrote:
>>>
Would it help adding a to the first video in the
page?
>>
On 3/17/10 1:02 PM, Marco Schuster wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 5:37 PM, Aryeh Gregor
> wrote:
>
>> On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 10:39 AM, Platonides wrote:
>>
>>> Would it help adding a to the first video in the page?
>>>
>> In Firefox, yes. Does anyone else implement that?
On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 5:37 PM, Aryeh Gregor
wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 10:39 AM, Platonides wrote:
>> Would it help adding a to the first video in the page?
>
> In Firefox, yes. Does anyone else implement that? If it's only
> Firefox, we could just as well replace Cortado with
> to be
* Platonides [Wed, 17 Mar 2010 18:43:38 +0100]:
> The core patches should be moved into hooks, so you don't have to
patch
> the same thing every time.
>
Unfortunately, not every hack is possible to implement via the hook. For
example, user groups are weak, there is no Group class or at least a
You mention on bug 22624 the possibility of normalising the entire
archive table to MW 1.5+ format.
What are the chances of moving them back to revision and use revdelete
for all deletions (removing archive table)?
See bugs 18104, 21279, 18780.
___
W
Dmitriy Sintsov wrote:
> Sure, I do. However, the old core was privately patched, so custom
> patches has to be ported to new core. Also, newer versions of extensions
> sometimes work with new core, sometimes they don't.
> Sorry, I've probably asked too much.
> Dmitriy
The core patches should be m
Aryeh Gregor wrote:
>> BTW, the current video handling doesn't work without javascript. I
>> thought we provided a link in such case. Now there's just an useless button.
>
> There's always a link on the File: page itself, no?
Yes, there's an info image which leads you to the File: page. Where you
* Platonides [Wed, 17 Mar 2010 15:40:40 +0100]:
> Dmitriy Sintsov wrote:
> > Sometimes newer versions of extensions have important fixes, but
> > unfortunately these extensions versions may be incompatible with
older
> > versions of MediaWiki, at the same time. It probably will be harder
to
> >
On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 10:39 AM, Platonides wrote:
> Would it help adding a to the first video in the page?
In Firefox, yes. Does anyone else implement that? If it's only
Firefox, we could just as well replace Cortado with
to begin with as soon as the page loads. In Chrome and Safari, we
do
Dmitriy Sintsov wrote:
> Sometimes newer versions of extensions have important fixes, but
> unfortunately these extensions versions may be incompatible with older
> versions of MediaWiki, at the same time. It probably will be harder to
> backport. Ok, nevermind.
> Dmitriy
So you also update mediaw
Gregory Maxwell wrote:
> In any case, none of the video on wikimedia sits is "autoplay" in the
> sense that it starts on its own. The video tag itself is set to
> autoplay, but the tag doesn't get inserted into the page until the
> user clicks. No video surprises. (Unfortunately this process doe
Jamie Morken wrote:
> Also I wonder if it is possible to convert from 7z to bz2 without having
> to make the 5469GB file first? If this can be done then having only 7z
> files would be fine, as the bz2 file could be created with a "normal"
> PC (ie one without a 6TB+ harddrive). This would be
19 matches
Mail list logo
