[Wikitech-l] Request for comments

2010-11-11 Thread Huji Lee
Hi I would be grateful if one could review the the functions added in the patchI attached to bug 24411 and post comments on the bug on how to improve the code. Best, Hojjat (

Re: [Wikitech-l] Backward compatibility guidelines

2010-11-11 Thread Platonides
Bryan Tong Minh wrote: > On Fri, Nov 5, 2010 at 5:23 PM, Aryeh Gregor wrote: >> ... > I don't have anything useful to say, but I wanted to add state "+1" > > > Bryan FWIW, that page has my support, too. ___ Wikitech-l mailing list Wikitech-l@lists.w

Re: [Wikitech-l] Killing $wgStyleDirectory

2010-11-11 Thread Platonides
Tim Starling wrote: > Platonides wrote: >> Backwards compatibility. >> Some systems may not support symlinks >> $wgStylePath would be sad if you killed $wgStyleDirectory >> (we provide them in pairs) > > If you're on Windows XP, you could just use completely separate copies > of MediaWiki, maybe w

Re: [Wikitech-l] Is that download.wikimedia.org server is down?

2010-11-11 Thread Platonides
Gerard Meijssen wrote: > Hoi, > An incremental backup starts with a full backup. I think I remember that > they were in the process of getting such a process started. > Thanks, > GerardM I don't know about that. You may be thinking on dumps made using the previous dump. Only new data is ret

Re: [Wikitech-l] Refresh of the Mediawiki logo

2010-11-11 Thread Marco Schuster
On Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 9:07 PM, David Gerard wrote: > On 11 November 2010 19:55, MZMcBride wrote: > >> The muted colors are a nice start, but I think the yellow still really >> sticks out when the logos are presented as a family. Maybe the petal color >> could be changed? > > > I think this not

Re: [Wikitech-l] Refresh of the Mediawiki logo

2010-11-11 Thread David Gerard
On 11 November 2010 19:55, MZMcBride wrote: > The muted colors are a nice start, but I think the yellow still really > sticks out when the logos are presented as a family. Maybe the petal color > could be changed? I think this not being a photo does not make it better than the photo version. It

Re: [Wikitech-l] Refresh of the Mediawiki logo

2010-11-11 Thread MZMcBride
Leo Koppelkamm wrote: > after seeing the new "powered by MediaWiki" button, I got motivated to > rework the existing tournesol logo a bit. Mainly because the use of > photos in logos is often discouraged and the path version looks a bit > "friendlier" as well. > > What do you think of it? > > Ful

[Wikitech-l] Refresh of the Mediawiki logo

2010-11-11 Thread Leo Koppelkamm
Hi, after seeing the new "powered by MediaWiki" button, I got motivated to rework the existing tournesol logo a bit. Mainly because the use of photos in logos is often discouraged and the path version looks a bit "friendlier" as well. What do you think of it? Fullsize: http://commons.wikimedia.o

Re: [Wikitech-l] Is that download.wikimedia.org server is down?

2010-11-11 Thread emijrp
Sorry. Where I said "from August 2010", I mean "of August 2010". I have only one .7z for every wiki of WMF. 2010/11/11 emijrp > There are some old dumps in Internet Archive,[1] but I guess you are > interested in the most recent ones. > > Also, I have a copy of all the pages-meta-history.xml.7z

Re: [Wikitech-l] Is that download.wikimedia.org server is down?

2010-11-11 Thread Gerard Meijssen
Hoi, An incremental backup starts with a full backup. I think I remember that they were in the process of getting such a process started. Thanks, GerardM On 11 November 2010 16:36, Bryan Tong Minh wrote: > On Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 4:32 PM, Dmitriy Sintsov > wrote: > > Although the develop

Re: [Wikitech-l] Is that download.wikimedia.org server is down?

2010-11-11 Thread Bryan Tong Minh
On Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 4:32 PM, Dmitriy Sintsov wrote: > Although the developers are smart people so probably I am wasting the > time and there is no reason to make incremental backups? > The main reason I believe is that it takes somebody to write such code.

Re: [Wikitech-l] Is that download.wikimedia.org server is down?

2010-11-11 Thread Dmitriy Sintsov
* emijrp [Thu, 11 Nov 2010 16:04:53 +0100]: > There are some old dumps in Internet Archive,[1] but I guess you are > interested in the most recent ones. > > Also, I have a copy of all the pages-meta-history.xml.7z from August > 2010 at > home. But I can't upload them anywhere, they are 100 GB. > W

Re: [Wikitech-l] Is that download.wikimedia.org server is down?

2010-11-11 Thread emijrp
There are some old dumps in Internet Archive,[1] but I guess you are interested in the most recent ones. Also, I have a copy of all the pages-meta-history.xml.7z from August 2010 at home. But I can't upload them anywhere, they are 100 GB. [1] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Emijrp/Wikipedia_Arc

Re: [Wikitech-l] Is that download.wikimedia.org server is down?

2010-11-11 Thread emijrp
The dump generating process is halted. Also, the official XML download page is "offline", until they fix the hardware. I don't know if there are mirrors. I don't think so. 2010/11/11 Billy Chan > Hi Robin, > > Thanks for your link. Do u know where i can download the xml dumps now? > Thanks. > >

Re: [Wikitech-l] Resource Loader problem

2010-11-11 Thread Jeroen De Dauw
Hey, I've send an email about this to the OpenLayers list, as this appears be to something that can not really be fixed by the RL. Cheers -- Jeroen De Dauw http://blog.bn2vs.com Don't panic. Don't be evil. -- ___ Wikitech-l mailing list Wikitech-l@list

Re: [Wikitech-l] Resource Loader problem

2010-11-11 Thread Jeroen De Dauw
Hey, > Could you point me to the code that generates those tags? No. That's all part of the OpenLayers library. I'll ask around on the OL IRC though :) Cheers -- Jeroen De Dauw http://blog.bn2vs.com Don't panic. Don't be evil. -- ___ Wikitech-l mailin

Re: [Wikitech-l] Resource Loader problem

2010-11-11 Thread Roan Kattouw
2010/11/10 Jeroen De Dauw : > Hey, > >> ...are trying to find images in the /img/ folder... > > So why is this, and how can it be fixed? It works when not using the RL... > Could you point me to the code that generates those tags? Roan Kattouw (Catrope) __