On Thu, 14 Jun 2012 12:18:47 -0700, Risker wrote:
I agree with Chris and Derric here; at least in the "western world", a
large percentage of IE7 users have not upgraded for "Enterprise" reasons.
Many of these enterprises use proprietary software that is written for
IE7,
and upgrading to the I
On Fri, Jun 15, 2012 at 5:27 AM, Antoine Musso wrote:
>>> Bugzilla IRC notifications are handled by wikibugs. It is a perl script
>>> that process bugzilla email notifications
merged the first version of wikibugs.pp
https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/#/c/8339/
--
Daniel Zahn
Hi
I was wondering what the policy is for the right to merge into core, i.e. for
being able to give +2 and "publish and submit" on gerrit. There sooms to be
total confusion about the policy for that.
To me this seems more or less equivalent to commit access to svn, no?
Anyway. I pretty much need
- d.
___
Wikitech-l mailing list
Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l
Although I can't speak for the Research Committee, I agree with Pradeep that
this is unlikely to violate any users privacy.
ASN cover very broad areas, significantly broader areas than you can gain
with the first three octets of an IP address. So they should reveal less
information than 125.237.8
On Fri, Jun 15, 2012 at 7:52 AM, Daniel Kinzler wrote:
> Hi
>
> I was wondering what the policy is for the right to merge into core, i.e. for
> being able to give +2 and "publish and submit" on gerrit. There sooms to be
> total confusion about the policy for that.
>
> To me this seems more or less
On 15.06.2012 14:41, Chad wrote:
> The equivalence of having commit access to /trunk/phase3, at least.
Yea... so I would have thought that anyone who had that level of access would
have gotten merge rights automatically. Oh, well.
> Right now the process is to ask on-wiki[0]. People have a chance
Daniel Friesen wrote:
> I do have to mention something on this whole topic. All these arguments
> seem to focus on saying that that IE6/7 should be supported because
> enterprises are dependent on out of date software and can't update.
> This line of thought completely ignores the fact that upgradi
Daniel Friesen wrote:
> IT departments need to start maintaining their computers and employees
> need to start demanding that the computers they work with are kept to
> modern standards.
> People keep bringing up legacy apps as a reason that IT departments
> cannot give employees a properly maintai
On 14 June 2012 20:49, Tyler wrote:
> Yes, Microsoft was great when they made IE 6, but when IE 7 came out,
> Microsoft killed
> the Internet star. I mean, HTML 5? What? I read a book that said after HTML
> 4.01, it would
> be XHTML 1.0, XHTML 1.1 ... not HTML 5!
I recommend you learn a thing
On Fri, 15 Jun 2012 07:15:47 -0700, MZMcBride wrote:
Daniel Friesen wrote:
IT departments need to start maintaining their computers and employees
need to start demanding that the computers they work with are kept to
modern standards.
People keep bringing up legacy apps as a reason that IT depa
MZMcBride wrote:
> Right... well, again, just like the OP, you're focusing on how you feel the
> world should be while completely ignoring reality. It's not a matter of
> catering to obstinate IT folks. It's a matter of being pragmatic about the
> current landscape and its limitations.
This touche
On 06/15/2012 08:41 AM, Chad wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 15, 2012 at 7:52 AM, Daniel Kinzler wrote:
>> Hi
>>
>> I was wondering what the policy is for the right to merge into core, i.e. for
>> being able to give +2 and "publish and submit" on gerrit. There sooms to be
>> total confusion about the policy
On 15 June 2012 01:30, Daniel Friesen wrote:
> I do have to mention something on this whole topic. All these arguments seem
> to focus on saying that that IE6/7 should be supported because enterprises
> are dependent on out of date software and can't update.
> This line of thought completely ignor
On Fri, Jun 15, 2012 at 8:48 AM, Sumana Harihareswara
wrote:
>> If i want to be able to commit to extension X. i first have to file a
> request on the "developer access" page, and then another request for
> "project membership"? on a page that is named "project ownership"?
>
Membership != ownershi
On Fri, Jun 15, 2012 at 8:48 AM, Sumana Harihareswara
wrote:
> If you merge into mediawiki/core.git, your change is considered safe for
> inclusion in a wmf branch. The wmf branch is just branched out of
> master and then deployed. We don't review it again. Because we're
> deploying more frequen
On 15/06/12 14:06, David Gerard wrote:
>
>
> - d.
» Yes, I switched to IE because I liked better the typeface it was
showing the pages...
___
Wikitech-l mailing list
Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech
On 15/06/12 17:48, Sumana Harihareswara wrote:
> Just have *one* page for all requests. gerrit account, group
> membership, project ownership, gerrit repo... one request queue, at
> least for all things that need feedback/voting
They have different needs.
- project ownership is watched by many peo
On 14/06/12 21:56, Sumana Harihareswara wrote:
> It's now planned for October 5-6. It would be great for European
> Wikimedia experts to go and teach people about the MediaWiki API,
> uploading tools, Commons gadgets, and so on.
That's the weekend after the closing of WLM 2012 contest.
On Fri, Jun 15, 2012 at 1:53 PM, Rob Lanphier wrote:
> It would also be nice if we didn't have to resort to the nuclear
> option to get the point across. One low-stakes way we can use to make
> sure people are more careful is to have some sort of rotating "oops"
> award. At one former job I had,
I started hacking together a node.js library for building command-line tools
around Gerrit's JSON-RPC API. I put a demo up on GitHub:
https://github.com/atdt/gerp. Looking for interested parties to fork / help
out. Feedback welcome.
Ori
___
Wikitech-
hey Ori,
I don know if you have already seen it, but you might wanna look at Git.js
(https://github.com/danlucraft/git.js) and its implementation.
Thanks,
drecodeam
On Saturday 16 June 2012 at 6:36 AM, Ori Livneh wrote:
> I started hacking together a node.js library for building command-line
On Sat, Jun 16, 2012 at 6:53 AM, Rob Lanphier wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 15, 2012 at 8:48 AM, Sumana Harihareswara
> wrote:
> > If you merge into mediawiki/core.git, your change is considered safe for
> > inclusion in a wmf branch. The wmf branch is just branched out of
> > master and then deployed.
23 matches
Mail list logo
