Le 05/10/12 21:40, Daniel Friesen wrote:
> The same case probably goes for a number of our other config variables.
>
> There are a few places where we go and swap out the value of a config
> variable and then reset it.
> Last one I saw was wgHtml5 in HtmlTests. However even that is almost
> never
I'm using Google Hangouts on Ubuntu and I can help anyone that's having a
problem. It works out of the box on Windows and OS X as far as I know. On
Ubuntu, I found it easier to set up with Chrome than with Chromium but it's
possible with both and other browsers.
As far as the profile requirement
On Mon, Oct 8, 2012 at 10:38 AM, Dan Andreescu wrote:
> As far as the profile requirement, it does require you to "upgrade" your
> google account to a google plus account. Most of us have google accounts
> through our wikimedia.org google mail and the required pieces of
> information for a google
On Mon, Oct 8, 2012 at 2:46 PM, Chad wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 8, 2012 at 10:38 AM, Dan Andreescu
> wrote:
>> As far as the profile requirement, it does require you to "upgrade" your
>> google account to a google plus account. Most of us have google accounts
>> through our wikimedia.org google mail
Hi all!
As discussed last week with Rob, I have no prepared a merge request that
introduces the ContentHandler into MediaWiki core. This is a major building
block for the Wikidata project. I hope the merge will be completed soon, since
this will grow stale fast.
The merge request is here: https:/
On Tue, 2012-10-02 at 14:22 -0400, Sumana Harihareswara wrote:
> I am delighted to announce that October 8th will be Andre Klapper's
> first day as Wikimedia Foundation's Bug Wrangler. [0]
Thanks Sumana and everybody for the warm welcome!
In the next days I'll start with my list of stuff to look
It is a bit confusing that
http://dumps.wikimedia.org/enwiki/20121001/enwiki-20121001-md5sums.txt
has newer hash values that aren't in
http://dumps.wikimedia.org/enwiki/latest/enwiki-latest-md5sums.txt. I'm
guessing that the "latest" md5sums files get updated only at the end of
a cycle when all
This may be of general interest to this list.
---
A number of leading browser vendors and other tech companies, including
Microsoft, Google, Apple, Adobe, Facebook, HP, Nokia, Mozilla, Opera and the
W3C, just announced the launch of the Web Platform Docs project at
WebPlatform.org. The project aim
Indeed, we're actually hosting some Git repos for the project :)
-Chad
On Oct 8, 2012 4:16 PM, "MZMcBride" wrote:
> This may be of general interest to this list.
>
> ---
> A number of leading browser vendors and other tech companies, including
> Microsoft, Google, Apple, Adobe, Facebook, HP, Nok
On Mon, Oct 8, 2012 at 2:49 PM, Chad wrote:
> Indeed, we're actually hosting some Git repos for the project :)
>
We'll be pushing a few more in soonish, too.
- Ryan
___
Wikitech-l mailing list
Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org
On 10/08/2012 03:02 PM, Ryan Lane wrote:
On Mon, Oct 8, 2012 at 2:49 PM, Chad wrote:
Indeed, we're actually hosting some Git repos for the project :)
We'll be pushing a few more in soonish, too.
Can you explain? I find this project amazing (converging and optimizing
documentation effort a
> Can you explain? I find this project amazing (converging and optimizing
> documentation effort as opposed to keep building a dozen chapels and why not
> starting a new, flashy one?). And I'm very happy to see that MediaWiki has
> been put into use!
>
> If the Wikimedia Foundation has got a signif
Some thoughts on:
https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Requests_for_comment/Core_user_preferences
and associated patchsets:
https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/#/c/27259/
https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/#/c/27258/
https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/#/c/27257/
https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/#/c/27197/
https://ge
Erik Moeller wrote:
> I'm 100% in favor of de-cluttering prefs. IMO this ought to be done on
> the basis of proper metrics of current usage, so that we actually
> understand who is using these options today and why.
Some of the RFC is also trying to focus on the history of some of these user
prefe
On Mon, Oct 8, 2012 at 5:49 PM, MZMcBride wrote:
> Some of the RFC is also trying to focus on the history of some of these user
> preferences. A lot of these preferences are very old and pre-date the
> Gadgets extension, for example. Some of them would make more sense
> implemented differently (c
15 matches
Mail list logo