This is great! Origin and gerrit remotes disagreeing could potentially
cause havoc. saper and I went through some tutorials telling people to use
`git clone -o gerrit` when starting development, but this is much cleaner.
I added it to
https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Gerrit/Tutorial#Prepare_to_work_
And, your Friday before it's due ping. This is your last weekend to work
on it!
> Hello all,
>
> I'm excited to share that we just opened an RFP for the Release
> Management of MediaWiki! More information below.
>
>
> The announcement blog post:
> https://blog.wikimedia.org/2013/05/21/request
Hello all,
== Preamble ==
Thanks to Robla, We now have a reliable way of creating a wikipage from
the Google Spreadsheet we actually edit.
Because of that, you can now see diffs! Eg: this is the one from today's
meeting:
http://www.mediawiki.org/w/index.php?title=Roadmap&diff=706771&oldid=70364
On Fri, Jun 7, 2013 at 12:02 AM, Tyler Romeo wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 7, 2013 at 2:58 AM, Tim Starling wrote:
>
>> I'm recommending making these "groups" of rights be both a UI concept
>> and a storage concept, very similar to the existing group feature,
>> rather than storing right grants and somehow
I generally agree with 2-8, and 10. I think points 2 and 10 are pretty
subjective and must be applied very pragmatically.
--
View this message in context:
http://wikimedia.7.x6.nabble.com/Architecture-Guidelines-Writing-Testable-Code-tp5006129p5006712.html
Sent from the Wikipedia Developers ma
Hello and welcome to the latest installment of your friendly deployment
highlights!
The full calendar for next week is available at:
https://wikitech.wikimedia.org/wiki/Deployments#Week_of_June_10th
Here are the highlights:
== Overall ==
* The week of June 10th is the first "clean" one-week cyc
What Brad said. In this case, I believe the assertSame function should be
used instead, which emulates ===.
On Jun 7, 2013 1:55 PM, "Brad Jorsch" wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 7, 2013 at 12:36 PM, Paul Selitskas
> wrote:
> > What is wrong here? Wrong test case + issue in PHPUnit or what?
>
> Fun with PH
On Fri, Jun 7, 2013 at 12:36 PM, Paul Selitskas wrote:
> What is wrong here? Wrong test case + issue in PHPUnit or what?
Fun with PHP comparison. With the "==" and "!=" operators (which are
what PHPUnit's assertEquals is probably using), PHP notices that "1"
and "01" are both "numeric strings" so
On 06/07/2013 11:43 AM, Asher Feldman wrote:
> Why not - would the patrol cost really be too high?
I can only speak for enwp, of course, but with my experience as a
checkuser and arb there (and a couple years as an admin before that) I
can say without a doubt that I would strenuously oppose relaxi
Hola!
I noticed something very strange in unit tests for /languages/Language.php
(/tests/phpunit/languages/LanguageTest.php):
Language::sprintfDate() is tested to conform with expected formatted date
strings. In the test file method 'provideSprintfDateSamples' provides a
test case for the format
On Fri, Jun 7, 2013 at 8:43 AM, Asher Feldman wrote:
> https://twitter.com/ioerror/status/342922052841377793
>
> Why not - would the patrol cost really be too high?
What I've heard is that the edits from tor were over 90%
spam/vandalism, so the IPs get blocked pretty quickly. Torblock (the
tool)
On 06/06/2013 09:17 AM, Erik Moeller wrote:
> Ken got involved in one of Cory’s pet projects, BoingBoing.net which
> some of you may have heard of ;-), and has been their sysadmin since
> 2003.
I continue to marvel at the cool experience my colleagues bring to their
work. OpenCOLA and Boing Boin
Ah, thanks Sumana!
On Friday, June 7, 2013, Sumana Harihareswara wrote:
> On 06/07/2013 08:43 AM, Asher Feldman wrote:
> > https://twitter.com/ioerror/status/342922052841377793
> >
> > Why not - would the patrol cost really be too high?
>
> Discussion from December:
> http://www.gossamer-threads.
On 06/07/2013 08:43 AM, Asher Feldman wrote:
> https://twitter.com/ioerror/status/342922052841377793
>
> Why not - would the patrol cost really be too high?
Discussion from December:
http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/wiki/wikitech/323006 "Can we help
Tor users make legitimate edits?"
--
Sum
On 7 June 2013 16:43, Asher Feldman wrote:
> https://twitter.com/ioerror/status/342922052841377793
> Why not - would the patrol cost really be too high?
Are you asking that question as a patroller? If not, then you should
probably ask on the wikis first.
- d.
https://twitter.com/ioerror/status/342922052841377793
Why not - would the patrol cost really be too high?
___
Wikitech-l mailing list
Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l
Hi!
Sorry for not answering via normal Reply, it's because I'm getting
messages in digests.
But I want to say thanks for clarification and for position=top advice
- it's OK with position=top.
Thanks :)
___
Wikitech-l mailing list
Wikitech-l@lists
On Fri, Jun 7, 2013 at 6:24 AM, Matthew Flaschen wrote:
> > Also I'm not sure 'Verified' is completely unused...
>
> I don't generally use it, but I've seen the QA/browser testing team do so.
That would probably be only me. :) I can live without "verified".
Željko
__
On Fri, Jun 7, 2013 at 2:58 AM, Tim Starling wrote:
> I'm recommending making these "groups" of rights be both a UI concept
> and a storage concept, very similar to the existing group feature,
> rather than storing right grants and somehow bidirectionally mapping
> them to group grants in the UI l
19 matches
Mail list logo
