On Fri, Jun 7, 2013 at 2:58 AM, Tim Starling <tstarl...@wikimedia.org>wrote:

> I'm recommending making these "groups" of rights be both a UI concept
> and a storage concept, very similar to the existing group feature,
> rather than storing right grants and somehow bidirectionally mapping
> them to group grants in the UI layer. That way, future code changes
> can split rights (e.g. upload -> upload/reupload), and have all the
> OAuth grants be implicitly updated by changing the group map.
>

Sounds good to me.

Since we would go crazy trying to talk about both the OAuth feature
> and the existing user feature as being "groups", Chris suggested using
> the term "permission" to refer to the fundamental unit of an OAuth grant.


But then wouldn't it be confused with permissions? Why not just call it a
"grant"? Though I guess that has it's own issues since OAuth has
authorization grants...

*-- *
*Tyler Romeo*
Stevens Institute of Technology, Class of 2016
Major in Computer Science
www.whizkidztech.com | tylerro...@gmail.com
_______________________________________________
Wikitech-l mailing list
Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l

Reply via email to