Re: [Wikitech-l] VE in 1.23? (was: Mozilla's Wiki Working Group meeting Tues 1600 UTC)

2014-05-05 Thread Martijn Hoekstra
On May 6, 2014 12:12 AM, "David Gerard" wrote: > > On 5 May 2014 23:08, James Forrester wrote: > > On 5 May 2014 15:05, David Gerard wrote: > > >> So ... how is 1.23 and Visual Editor? > >> * Has anyone sat down and written out how to add VE magic to a 1.23 > >> tarball install? > > I do not bel

Re: [Wikitech-l] VE in 1.23? (was: Mozilla's Wiki Working Group meeting Tues 1600 UTC)

2014-05-05 Thread Gerard Meijssen
Hoi, This does pique my interest, what makes the en.wp so special ? Thanks, GerardM On 6 May 2014 00:11, David Gerard wrote: > On 5 May 2014 23:08, James Forrester wrote: > > On 5 May 2014 15:05, David Gerard wrote: > > >> So ... how is 1.23 and Visual Editor? > >> * Has anyone sat down

Re: [Wikitech-l] Wikisource core feature is broken for more than 50 hours

2014-05-05 Thread Raylton P. Sousa
Luís.. Pode me explicar melhor esse bug? Estou no IRC. 2014-05-05 19:35 GMT-03:00 Luiz Augusto : > So sorry for the cross-posting and for this shout for help that some can > read as a forum shopping, but this is really annoying. > > https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=64622 > > In sho

[Wikitech-l] Wikisource core feature is broken for more than 50 hours

2014-05-05 Thread Luiz Augusto
So sorry for the cross-posting and for this shout for help that some can read as a forum shopping, but this is really annoying. https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=64622 In short, we on all Wikisource wikis are unable to start working on new pages from digitized books (or for newly ove

Re: [Wikitech-l] VE in 1.23? (was: Mozilla's Wiki Working Group meeting Tues 1600 UTC)

2014-05-05 Thread James Forrester
On 5 May 2014 15:11, David Gerard wrote: > On 5 May 2014 23:08, James Forrester wrote: > > On 5 May 2014 15:05, David Gerard wrote: > > >> So ... how is 1.23 and Visual Editor? > >> * Has anyone sat down and written out how to add VE magic to a 1.23 > >> tarball install? > > I do not believe so

Re: [Wikitech-l] VE in 1.23? (was: Mozilla's Wiki Working Group meeting Tues 1600 UTC)

2014-05-05 Thread David Gerard
On 5 May 2014 23:08, James Forrester wrote: > On 5 May 2014 15:05, David Gerard wrote: >> So ... how is 1.23 and Visual Editor? >> * Has anyone sat down and written out how to add VE magic to a 1.23 >> tarball install? > I do not believe so, no. If someone could do that, I hereby promise to be

Re: [Wikitech-l] VE in 1.23? (was: Mozilla's Wiki Working Group meeting Tues 1600 UTC)

2014-05-05 Thread James Forrester
On 5 May 2014 15:05, David Gerard wrote: > So ... how is 1.23 and Visual Editor? > > * Has anyone sat down and written out how to add VE magic to a 1.23 > tarball install? > ​I do not believe so, no.​ > * VE is big and complicated. I'm not clear on what it needs. Parsoid > as a daemon or some

[Wikitech-l] VE in 1.23? (was: Mozilla's Wiki Working Group meeting Tues 1600 UTC)

2014-05-05 Thread David Gerard
On 5 May 2014 22:59, Sumana Harihareswara wrote: > Mozilla has a new Wiki Working Group[0] "to develop and drive a roadmap > of improvements to http://wiki.mozilla.org";. They're currently on > MediaWiki 1.19, and I predict they will want to get onto 1.23 once that > is released (since it's going

[Wikitech-l] Mozilla's Wiki Working Group meeting Tues 1600 UTC

2014-05-05 Thread Sumana Harihareswara
Mozilla has a new Wiki Working Group[0] "to develop and drive a roadmap of improvements to http://wiki.mozilla.org";. They're currently on MediaWiki 1.19, and I predict they will want to get onto 1.23 once that is released (since it's going to be the long-term support release[1][2]), and that they'

Re: [Wikitech-l] [Engineering] Help! Phabricator and our code review process

2014-05-05 Thread Matthew Flaschen
On 05/02/2014 03:56 PM, C. Scott Ananian wrote: [greg-g] cscott: James_F crazy idea here: can some teams use it for real (I think growth is, kinda?) and export/import to a future real instance? frontend... No, we're not using it for real currently. We (Growth) have talked about potentially be

Re: [Wikitech-l] Help! Phabricator and our code review process

2014-05-05 Thread Matthew Flaschen
On 05/05/2014 01:21 PM, Quim Gil wrote: I created https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Requests_for_comment/Phabricator/versus_Bugzillato consolidate the relevant information for bug reporters. https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Requests_for_comment/Phabricator/versus_Bugzilla Phabricator still does no

Re: [Wikitech-l] Vagrant CentralAuth role

2014-05-05 Thread Chris Steipp
I just found out about that from Ori too. Problem solved. Thanks! On Mon, May 5, 2014 at 12:42 PM, Bryan Davis wrote: > On Mon, May 5, 2014 at 1:17 PM, Chris Steipp > wrote: > > Different domains is closer to how we run thing in production, but it > would > > require copying dns settings to yo

Re: [Wikitech-l] Vagrant CentralAuth role

2014-05-05 Thread Bryan Davis
On Mon, May 5, 2014 at 1:17 PM, Chris Steipp wrote: > Different domains is closer to how we run thing in production, but it would > require copying dns settings to your host (there doesn't seem to be a good, > cross-platform way to do this from vagrant itself, but if anyone has a > solution, that

[Wikitech-l] Vagrant CentralAuth role

2014-05-05 Thread Chris Steipp
Hi all, I'm planning to spend some time in Zurich getting a centralauth role for vagrant working (part of https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Z%C3%BCrich_Hackathon_2014/Topics#Production-like_Vagrant). I wanted to get opinions (probably more bikeshed) about how you would like to access multiple wikis o

Re: [Wikitech-l] recent changes stream

2014-05-05 Thread Petr Bena
I said this once in a gerrit comment and I will say it here as well: most of people have different opinion on what is "good" for them as RC stream. We should go for anything specific, but rather for a very abstract solution that could be multiplexed into multiple RC feed providers using a number of

Re: [Wikitech-l] recent changes stream

2014-05-05 Thread Victor Vasiliev
On 05/05/2014 05:29 AM, Petr Bena wrote: > I am not saying that IRC is suitable for this and I know that people > really wanted to get rid of it or replace it with something better, > but I just can't see how is this better. > Most programming languages have an implementation of WebSockets, and,

Re: [Wikitech-l] Help! Phabricator and our code review process

2014-05-05 Thread Quim Gil
On Monday, May 5, 2014, Tyler Romeo wrote: > OK, so I'm sorry if this information is duplicated anywhere, but between > the Project Management Tools review page, the Phabricator RFC, the various > sub-pages of the RFC, and the content on the Phabricator instance itself, > it would take me at leas

Re: [Wikitech-l] Help! Phabricator and our code review process

2014-05-05 Thread Andre Klapper
On Mon, 2014-05-05 at 12:18 -0400, Tyler Romeo wrote: > Phabricator still does not work directly with Git, right? This topic is covered in http://fab.wmflabs.org/T207 andre -- Andre Klapper | Wikimedia Bugwrangler http://blogs.gnome.org/aklapper/ ___

Re: [Wikitech-l] Please welcome Filippo Giunchedi to Wikimedia TechOps

2014-05-05 Thread Sumana Harihareswara
On 05/05/2014 10:48 AM, Mark Bergsma wrote: > I'm very happy to announce that Filippo Giunchedi is joining us as an > Operations Engineer in the Technical Operations team. Filippo is Italian, but > he lives in Dublin where he interned at Google and worked at Amazon before > coming to Wikimedia.

Re: [Wikitech-l] recent changes stream

2014-05-05 Thread Erik Bernhardson
I think we need to be clearer about what the goal is here, as is I think we are all taking our personal idea of what we want to do with a feed and applying that to this implementation. Personally I have been working on an external watchlist service that i would love to hook up to a feed, but witho

Re: [Wikitech-l] Help! Phabricator and our code review process

2014-05-05 Thread Tyler Romeo
OK, so I'm sorry if this information is duplicated anywhere, but between the Project Management Tools review page, the Phabricator RFC, the various sub-pages of the RFC, and the content on the Phabricator instance itself, it would take me at least a couple of hours to organize my thoughts. So I'll

Re: [Wikitech-l] Help! Phabricator and our code review process

2014-05-05 Thread Quim Gil
Hi, please check this draft plan for the next steps in the Phabricator RfC at https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Requests_for_comment/Phabricator/Plan This aims to be a starting point for the next round of discussion to be held online and at the Wikimedia hackathon in Zürich this weekend. Edits, ques

[Wikitech-l] Please welcome Filippo Giunchedi to Wikimedia TechOps

2014-05-05 Thread Mark Bergsma
I'm very happy to announce that Filippo Giunchedi is joining us as an Operations Engineer in the Technical Operations team. Filippo is Italian, but he lives in Dublin where he interned at Google and worked at Amazon before coming to Wikimedia. He's gained a lot of experienced working with large

Re: [Wikitech-l] recent changes stream

2014-05-05 Thread Petr Bena
Given the current specifications I can only support this change as long as current IRC feed is preserved as IRC is IMHO, as much as evil it looks, more suitable for this than WebSockets. I am not saying that IRC is suitable for this and I know that people really wanted to get rid of it or replace

Re: [Wikitech-l] Image scaling proposal: server-side mip-mapping

2014-05-05 Thread Gilles Dubuc
> > Buttons is French: Suiv. -> Make it English > That's a bug in SurveyMonkey, the buttons are in French because I was using the French version of the site at the time the survey was created, and now that text on those buttons can't be fixed. I'll make sure to switch SurveyMoney to English before

Re: [Wikitech-l] recent changes stream

2014-05-05 Thread Daniel Kinzler
Am 05.05.2014 07:20, schrieb Jeremy Baron: > On May 4, 2014 10:24 PM, "Ori Livneh" wrote: >> an implementation for a recent changes >> stream broadcast via socket.io, an abstraction layer over WebSockets that >> also provides long polling as a fallback for older browsers. [...] > How could this

Re: [Wikitech-l] recent changes stream

2014-05-05 Thread Ori Livneh
On Sun, May 4, 2014 at 9:09 PM, Tyler Romeo wrote: > Just wondering, but has any performance testing been done on different > socket.io implementations? IIRC, Python is pretty good, so I definitely > approve, but I'm wondering if there are other implementations are are more > performant (specific

Re: [Wikitech-l] Running database tests with jenkins

2014-05-05 Thread Moritz Schubotz
Hi, I'm trying to resend this message that got lost. Best Physikerwelt On Tue, Apr 15, 2014 at 1:13 PM, Moritz Schubotz wrote: > Dear all, > > I had some trouble to run the database tests that worked well locally on > jenkins. > In the onLoadExtensionSchemaUpdates hook I check for mysql/sqllit