Thanks for your reply
I followed the steps given in that article but i am still facing this issue
Can you help me in it?
On Sat, Feb 5, 2022, 12:05 Andre Klapper wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Sat, 2022-02-05 at 11:57 +0530, Shreyaans Jain wrote:
> > Hey everyone I was working on Videocuttool
> > issue ht
You need to be on a branch to use git review. You cannot use it while in a
detached HEAD state.
On Sat, 5 Feb 2022 at 16:53, Shreyaans Jain
wrote:
> Thanks for your reply
>
> I followed the steps given in that article but i am still facing this
> issue
> Can you help me in it?
>
> On Sat, Feb 5,
I used git push also that was also giving me error
Can you suggest me what should I do?
On Sat, Feb 5, 2022, 17:01 Siddharth VP wrote:
> You need to be on a branch to use git review. You cannot use it while in a
> detached HEAD state.
>
> On Sat, 5 Feb 2022 at 16:53, Shreyaans Jain
> wrote:
>
I did not say to use "git push". For Gerrit, only "git review" should be
used.
The error in that screenshot is that you're in a detached HEAD state
(9b6fe4f). You should switch to a branch, "git checkout -b branchname",
then "git review" from there.
On Sat, 5 Feb 2022 at 17:08, Shreyaans Jain
wr
Hey I have posted the proper link and issue I am facing on zulip in general
under(help needed) topic pls check it and let me know what I am doing
wrong.
On Sat, 5 Feb, 2022, 11:16 am Greg Grossmeier, wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Searching for "afch-rewrite" leads me to
> https://github.com/WPAFC/afch-rewri
It looks like you're trying to edit
https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/c/labs/tools/VideoCutTool/+/716255/ but you
can't do that as only members of Trusted-Contributors group are allowed to
edit others' patches.
Can you show the output of "git log -1" ?
On Sat, 5 Feb 2022 at 18:00, Shreyaans Jain
wr
Ok, so you're actually Khr2003 on Gerrit? Ignore my comment about editing
others' patches then.
The patch says there's a merge conflict. Try rebasing the branch with
master branch ("git rebase master") before using "git review".
On Sat, 5 Feb 2022 at 18:31, Shreyaans Jain
wrote:
> Sure
>
> On
No I am shreyaansjain06 on gerrit I only added the fix docker compose file
in git commit -- amend
which you can see on git log
Also I forgot to mention one thing maybe that will help you find what
mistake I am doing ,like the latest code is not in repo
So after cloning the repo i ran this command
In that case, the problem is as I mentioned above. Only
Trusted-Contributors can edit others' patches.
Here's something you can try but I'm not sure if it will work or not –
instead of amending that commit, create a new commit on top of it. (Get a
fresh copy of the patch by running "git review -d
Hi,
I am aware of the various limits in the NewPP report. I'm trying to
determine if we currently we have some max page size (before or after
processing).
The documentation on mw.org and en.wp is a bit confusing on the subject and
personal experimentation shows that substituting templates allows
Thanks a lot Siddhart for your reply
On Sat, Feb 5, 2022 at 9:16 PM Siddharth VP wrote:
> In that case, the problem is as I mentioned above. Only
> Trusted-Contributors can edit others' patches.
>
> Here's something you can try but I'm not sure if it will work or not –
> instead of amending tha
On Sat, 2022-02-05 at 18:43 +0200, Strainu wrote:
> I am aware of the various limits in the NewPP report. I'm trying to
> determine if we currently we have some max page size (before or after
> processing).
>
> The documentation on mw.org and en.wp is a bit confusing on the
> subject and personal
I co maintain codesearch with Kunal and I have similar notes. I hope
instead of duplicating the work, we could join forces to improve the
development productivity infrastructure.
Codesearch has been working fine in the past couple of years. There is a
new frontend being built and I hope we can dep
În sâm., 5 feb. 2022 la 19:53, Andre Klapper a scris:
>
> On Sat, 2022-02-05 at 18:43 +0200, Strainu wrote:
> > I am aware of the various limits in the NewPP report. I'm trying to
> > determine if we currently we have some max page size (before or after
> > processing).
> >
> > The documentation o
Am 05.02.22 um 21:38 schrieb Amir Sarabadani:
Codesearch has been working fine in the past couple of years. There is a new
frontend being built and I hope we can deploy it soon to provide a better user
experience and I personally don't see a value in re-implementing codesearch.
Especially using
On the theme of code search, I have submitted a MediaWiki docset to
the Dash user contributions repo, so you can also use it with Zeal[1],
which looks like this [2, 3]. It includes collaboration diagrams and
references/referenced by listings.
Obviously, as it's only from the core doxygen it doesn'
16 matches
Mail list logo