On Fri, Jun 15, 2012 at 1:53 PM, Rob Lanphier wrote:
> It would also be nice if we didn't have to resort to the nuclear
> option to get the point across. One low-stakes way we can use to make
> sure people are more careful is to have some sort of rotating "oops"
> award. At one former job I had,
On Fri, Jun 15, 2012 at 8:48 AM, Sumana Harihareswara
wrote:
>> If i want to be able to commit to extension X. i first have to file a
> request on the "developer access" page, and then another request for
> "project membership"? on a page that is named "project ownership"?
>
Membership != ownershi
On May 25, 2012 10:11 PM, "Derric Atzrott"
wrote:
>
> Ah. That would do it. I had forgotten to mention this, but in
> SpecialMasterPlanForm.php I have a line "$wgOut->addModules(
> 'ext.MasterPlanForm.core');" but if I need put that in a BeforePageDisplay
> hook, that would explain it.
>
No, the
On Fri, May 25, 2012 at 12:47 PM, Derric Atzrott
wrote:
> I have read the Migration Guide for Extension Developers; I actually still
> have it open right now. It lead me to believe that if I were to do the
> following, I could expect to see some sort of result.
>
> Add the following to the end of
On Fri, May 25, 2012 at 12:32 PM, Derric Atzrott
wrote:
> I've been doing some reading recently on the MediaWiki wiki about
> ResourceManager and how to use it to use JavaScript in MediaWiki extensions.
> Perhaps because it is new the documentation is not complete, or perhaps I
> just didn't quite
On Fri, May 25, 2012 at 11:40 AM, Ryan Kaldari wrote:
> The bot flag is rather confusing since edits can be marked as bot edits or
> non-bot edits regardless of whether they are actually coming from a bot. The
> edit API accepts a 'bot' or 'notbot' parameter and I believe this is what
> actually g
On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 7:06 AM, Antoine Musso wrote:
> I think the branch is given as an argument to git-review, aka:
>
> git review [BRANCH]
>
That's right. You can submit to a different branch by running 'git
review branchname'. Also, if you create a branch that's gonna stick
around for longer
On Mon, May 21, 2012 at 3:17 PM, Tomasz Finc wrote:
> On Mon, May 21, 2012 at 2:25 PM, Mark A. Hershberger
> wrote:
>> The Developer works with the Director to help the Director develop
>> reasonable timelines. Bugzilla's Milestones and the priority within a
>> Milestone are especially suited f
On Thu, May 17, 2012 at 4:25 PM, Terry Chay wrote:
> Hello everyone,
>
> It’s with great pleasure that I’m announcing that Subramanya Sastry is
> joining the Wikimedia Foundation as a Senior Features Software Engineer.
Our second new team member of the day, yay!
Welcome Subbu and James, looking f
On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 7:32 PM, Terry Chay wrote:
> I thought http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Manual:Edit_token protects against
> this as it is required for an edit: http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/API:Edit
>
Not if you can read the data using the Object/Array constructor hacks
you described. The p
On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 4:37 PM, Terry Chay wrote:
> - jsonp for state changing should be allowed (if it isn't already) since they
> require an edit token (shared secret) [QUESTION: is this prevented or is the
> API documentation in error? It should be allowed. The edittoken blocks XSSI
> and C
On May 15, 2012 9:52 PM, "CherianTinu Abraham"
wrote:
>
> I did try to create a new namespace & used $wgNamespaceProtection
>
> $wgNamespaceProtection[NS_WIKIMEETUPS] = array( '*' );
>
> but it is not allowing *anyone* to edit the new namespace, not even the
> sysops.
>
$wgNamespaceProtection work
On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 12:19 PM, Jeremy Postlethwaite
wrote:
> Thanks Roan,
>
> I updated the documentation.
>
> Does it matter which Change-Id you pick of your commits?
> - Is it best to pick the last over the first or vice-versa?
>
If they're new commits, it doesn't matter. However, if you're
s
On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 11:51 AM, Jeremy Postlethwaite
wrote:
> I added a howto for doing an interactive rebase with git and gerrit:
>
> https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Git/rebase
>
> If there is anything wrong with this please let me know!
>
Additionally, you really shouldn't leave multiple Change
On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 11:51 AM, Jeremy Postlethwaite
wrote:
> I added a howto for doing an interactive rebase with git and gerrit:
>
> https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Git/rebase
>
> If there is anything wrong with this please let me know!
>
I don't see why you'd run 'git pull origin master' after
On Tue, May 8, 2012 at 6:36 PM, Denny Vrandečić
wrote:
> P.S.: There is one thing I do not understand though. According to
> https://simple.wikipedia.org/w/api.php?action=query&meta=siteinfo the
> language of simple.wp is "en", but MessagesSimple.php seems to be taken
> into account (instead of "e
On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 5:52 PM, Rob Lanphier wrote:
> I don't have a strong opinion about whether we need to follow rule #1
> above through an iteration of our six month tarball release cycle, but
> we at least need to follow it through the two week deployment cycle.
>
I think rule #1 is unnecess
While we were still getting set up with deployments from git/Gerrit,
we have allowed deployers to push directly to the wmf/* branches using
'git push origin wmf/1.20wmf1'. This bypasses Gerrit completely, so
there is no review (which is usually what we want), but also no e-mail
notification, no IRC
On Fri, Apr 13, 2012 at 1:33 PM, Antoine Musso wrote:
> The issue is because your last commit has been done based on a remote
> named 'origin' whereas git-review use the remote named 'gerrit'. Since
> most people update only the origin remote with git pull, the gerrit
> remote is lagging behind.
On Wed, Apr 18, 2012 at 3:57 PM, Platonides wrote:
> Release early, release often. It can be committed in ugly format, and be
> prettified later (maybe with community help, as I pointed).
>
Sure, but there will be some effort required to 1) disentangle the
private files (even though we can easily
On Wed, Apr 18, 2012 at 3:40 PM, Platonides wrote:
> Well, "two months" was a random timeframe. I'm not that you had other
> things to do. Deployment changes was a good time to include this
> wmf-config thing. I also know that there was some block because it
> "contains sensitive stuff", I'm a bit
On Wed, Apr 18, 2012 at 10:40 AM, Platonides wrote:
> What about making (and publishing) a git repo of wikipedia/common?
> That would allow
> a) Easily reproduce the configuration on wmflabs
> b) Distribute cleanup of that messy folder tree.
>
> Yes, passwords should not be committed. No, waiting
On Tue, Apr 17, 2012 at 8:58 PM, Krinkle wrote:
> Who said anything about denormalization[1]? Maybe I'm missing something
> here,
> but I think we're saying the same thing.
>
Now that you've elaborated I can tell that we are. It's just that "If
you could merge the tables and make it still perform
On Apr 17, 2012 10:54 PM, "K. Peachey" wrote:
> > Why is this there and not on http://www.mediawiki.org ?
>
> Because its about the WMF cluster admin and/or documentation and not
> MW in general.
>
And because the documentation for "I just broke mediawiki.org, how do I fix
this" shouldn't be on me
I have gone through
https://wikitech.wikimedia.org/view/How_to_deploy_code and updated it
to describe the Magical Git Universe. Specifically, there is a lot of
documentation surrounding the submodules that we now use for deploying
extensions, and surrounding the process and mechanics of extension
d
On Tue, Apr 17, 2012 at 2:37 PM, Martijn Hoekstra
wrote:
> Am I reading this right as suggesting and encouragement of database
> denormalisation in extensions?
>
Ignore what Krinkle said. We DO NOT encourage denormalization, except
where necessary for performance reasons.
Your extension should ha
On Mon, Apr 16, 2012 at 9:13 PM, K. Peachey wrote:
> I believe "//bits.wikimedia.org/skins/{monobook/main.css}" is setup to
> always point to the latest version so that should be alright, but
> someone else will need to confirm.
>
In the Magical World of Continuous Deployments, it'll usually point
On Sun, Apr 15, 2012 at 11:59 AM, Thomas Gries wrote:
> On my MediaWiki 1.20alpha (r114161) I added some new Interwiki
> definitions such as geocache =
> http://www.geocaching.com/seek/cache_details.aspx?wp=$1
>
How did you add these interwiki definitions exactly?
Roan
__
On Apr 11, 2012 11:01 PM, "Antoine Musso" wrote:
> const EXT_URL_REGEX =
> '/^(([\w]+:)?\/\/)?(([\d\w]|%[a-fA-f\d]{2,2})+(:([\d\w]|%[a-fA-f\d]{2,2})+
>
)?@)?([\d\w][-\d\w]{0,253}[\d\w]\.)+[\w]{2,4}(:[\d]+)?(\/([-+_~.\d\w]|%[a-fA-f\d]{2,2})*)*(\?(&?
>
([-+_~.\d\w]|%[a-fA-f\d]{2,2})=?)*)?(#([-+_~.\d
In SVN, SyntaxHighlight had an external for geshi/geshi.php and
friends. This is gone in git, so out of the box I now get:
Warning: require(geshi/geshi.php): failed to open stream: No such file
or directory in
/home/catrope/mediawiki/git/extensions/SyntaxHighlight_GeSHi/SyntaxHighlight_GeSHi.class
On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 7:24 AM, Niklas Laxström
wrote:
> Solution 1:
> Use the LoadBalancer to open connection to the other wiki.
> * Does WikiPage support editing pages on another databases like this?
> * This way we culd bypass things like blocked user/protected page
> unless we check for those
On Sun, Apr 8, 2012 at 5:44 AM, Daniel Friesen wrote:
> -- tl;dr start --
> We're using gerrit now. And as we use it we all keep running into issues
> stemming fundamentally from how gerrit is designed.
>
> I had an irc discussion with Roan[1] awhile ago tossing around ideas on
> how we would writ
On Fri, Apr 6, 2012 at 2:16 PM, Chad wrote:
> > * We still need to audit the scap/sync scripts to make sure that .git
> > folder is being excluded on scap. Roan has started looking at that
> > now.
> >
>
> Awesome.
>
> Done in https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Special:Code/MediaWiki/114777 ,
filed
On Thu, Apr 5, 2012 at 11:37 AM, Platonides wrote:
> On 05/04/12 20:23, Roan Kattouw wrote:
> > This only happens if you click "Publish and Submit", which means "publish
> > my comments and attempt to merge the commit". This fails because there is
> > no
On Thu, Apr 5, 2012 at 11:20 AM, Platonides wrote:
> If you submit a code review for a changeset and not a verification
> status (only if it is not verified?), it throws you an error:
> > Application Error
> > Server Error
> > Requires Verified
>
> I suspect it's a bug and we should ignore it but
On Thu, Apr 5, 2012 at 4:04 AM, Happy Melon wrote:
> So basically, in Gerrit, (1 + 1 != 2)...?? :-)
>
> ...and that's exactly why I said that "+2" is a confusingly named concept
in my previous message.
Roan
___
Wikitech-l mailing list
Wikitech-l@lists.
On Wed, Apr 4, 2012 at 11:55 AM, Antoine Musso wrote:
> Dear Gerrit users,
>
> Gerrit let us flag changes with two fields:
>
> - Code Review
> - Verified
>
> Anyone is allowed to +1/-1 the Code Review field but only a few people
> are allowed to mark a change as Verified.
> I have bring back Je
On Thu, Mar 29, 2012 at 7:07 AM, Chad wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 29, 2012 at 9:42 AM, Jon Robson wrote:
>> +1 for There is a problem with this patchset, please improve.
>>
>
> Alright, sounds good to me. Thanks for the input everyone.
> I'll get this fixed soon.
>
This was done about an hour ago. Chad
On Thu, Mar 29, 2012 at 2:05 PM, Chad wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 29, 2012 at 4:57 PM, Thomas Gries wrote:
>> Suggestion: git workshop and tutorial @ Hackathon Berlin 2012
>>
>
> Anyone volunteering to run it?
>
I'm willing to run it. I'm assuming Antoine and Brion will be there
and Ryan Lane might be,
On Thu, Mar 29, 2012 at 12:45 PM, Michael Movchin wrote:
> I think @wikimedia.org should only have staff of wikimedia. So
> @wikipedia.org is a great idea.
>
@wikipedia.org is similarly official-looking, I'm not sure that'll fly.
In the SVN days, Chad and I were toying with the idea of giving
com
On Thu, Mar 29, 2012 at 6:38 AM, Max Semenik wrote:
> Significantly slower today from Europe, graphs show a drastic drop at esams
> http://is.gd/fKnluM and a raise on pmtpa http://is.gd/sowDb4
>
> Can this be fixed?
>
Peter restarted cp3001, things look much better now.
Roan
2012/3/28 Roan Kattouw :
> That's very weird. Looks like that was an intermittent error while I
> was in the middle of deploying a change?
>
I only see 3 of these in exception.log , so I think it's fine. If this
were happening on every page save, we'd be seeing a
2012/3/28 Bináris :
> Folks, I have never had such an error...
>
> The page is:
> http://hu.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Lyserg_Diethel_%28s%C3%A1m%C3%A1nkir%C3%A1ly%29&action=submit
> (It occured during saving.)
>
> The message (belső hiba means internal error):
> Belső hiba
> A Wikipédiából, a
On Wed, Mar 28, 2012 at 8:54 AM, Greg Sabino Mullane wrote:
> What's the standard way to reply to a comment someone has made
> to one of your commits? Nothing was obvious in the interface, so
> I just did a "Review" with a score of 0 (obviously :). Drawbacks
> to this way:
>
> * It really shouldn'
On Wed, Mar 28, 2012 at 8:55 AM, Petr Bena wrote:
> Yes I would like to help as well, but it would be nice if you told us,
> how. My suggestion is to enable ipv6 on wikimedia labs, and on beta
> cluster, so that we can test the mediawiki support for ipv6 there and
> let the community of wikimedia
On Wed, Mar 28, 2012 at 1:58 AM, Amir E. Aharoni
wrote:
> When i use `git review -d' on a change that was in the aforementioned
> branch, another branch called "review/amire80/bug/31817" is created,
> so i suppose that Gerrit identified the bug number (or maybe somebody
> did it manually and i mis
On Mon, Mar 26, 2012 at 9:50 PM, Tim Starling wrote:
> For commits with lots of files, Gerrit's diff interface is too broken
> to be useful. It does not provide a compact overview of the change
> which is essential for effective review.
>
> Luckily, there are alternatives, specifically local git c
On Sat, Mar 24, 2012 at 9:21 PM, Marcin Cieslak wrote:
> This is normally not a problem for people who are allowed changes
> without "Change-Id" to the repository (i.e. trunk gatekeepers),
> but this may add some problems for committers at large.
>
Let me debunk that myth right there: NO ONE is al
On Mar 22, 2012 3:44 PM, "Rob Lanphier" wrote:
> Another possible plan would be to have something *somewhat* closer to
> what we have today, with new branches off of trunk for each
> deployment, and deployments happening as frequently as weekly.
>
> master
> ├── 1.20wmf01
> ├── 1.20wmf02
> ├── 1.2
On Sat, Mar 24, 2012 at 9:21 PM, Marcin Cieslak wrote:
> When playing with moving (cherry picking) commits from master to one
> of the release branches (REL1_19) I noticed that "git cherry-pick"
> and "git merge" do not invoke "commit-msg" hook and therefore don't
> add Change-Id to the commits.
>
On Thu, Mar 22, 2012 at 1:22 AM, Max Semenik wrote:
> Well done, Roan! Is there a way to join several related recommits in
> Gerrit for easier review?
>
Not really, unless you do what Antoine said (squash them together and resubmit).
Also note that some of the changes I submitted depend on each o
Now that the Git switchover is complete, this code freeze is lifted. SVN is
now locked as far as core and WMF-deployed extensions go, so you can't
commit there anymore. New commits for core and deployed extensions are
welcome in Gerrit, see also Chad's message.
As for the reverts: I ended up rever
On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 4:08 PM, Jeroen De Dauw wrote:
> Hey,
>
>> WMF-deployed extensions
>
> Does this include extension worked on by WMF people and to be deployed on
> WMF wikis? In particular, should I quit committing to Education Program or
> can I happily carry on?
>
This includes extensions
As you all probably know, the Gerrit migration is going to happen in a
little over 24 hours. For the SVN repositories being migrated (core
and all WMF-deployed extensions), I am doing three special things
today.
First, I am identifying all unreviewed revisions and reviewing those
that 1) I am capa
On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 11:35 AM, Asher Feldman wrote:
> How do you feel about a switch to change that behavior (maxlag - 1)? It
> would be nice to be continue guiding developers towards throttling API
> requests around maxlag without complicating schema migrations by requiring
> config deployment
On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 7:12 AM, MZMcBride wrote:
> Some people have suggested that the current API behavior is intentional.
> That is, that having different servers return the same error code is better
> than having different servers return an error code or not. I think this is
> flawed logic due
On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 1:47 PM, Daniel Barrett wrote:
> Any advice on how to structure this?
It sounds to me like stripState should have a way to change what a
given strip marker's value is after you've already inserted it. That
in combination with a hook that runs at the right time (after all th
On Sat, Mar 10, 2012 at 7:20 PM, Sumana Harihareswara
wrote:
> I believe the lack of arbitrary labels/tags on changes is a big workflow
> problem.[0] The current workaround is to use "topic branches" (Gerrit
> calls them topics; Git calls them branches). To do that, you have to
> use git-review.
On Thu, Mar 8, 2012 at 12:58 PM, Chad wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 8, 2012 at 3:51 PM, Roan Kattouw wrote:
>> I don't know why this happens, but you really don't need internal API
>> requests to get thumbnail URLs. This is much simpler:
>>
>> $file = wfFindFi
On Thu, Mar 8, 2012 at 12:39 PM, Jeroen De Dauw wrote:
> Hey,
>
> I'm seeing some weird behavior and can't figure out what's going on.
>
> I have some code making a request to the API to obtain the thumb url of an
> image: http://dpaste.org/nuOfX/
>
> This code is used here, and right now the firs
On Wed, Mar 7, 2012 at 6:01 AM, Chad wrote:
> git-review helps lower some of these barriers since it automatically
> rebases against origin/* for you so you get a clean merge on push.
> Cherry picking's not that hard, and gerrit actually gives you the command
> from the UI to pull the specific pat
On Tue, Mar 6, 2012 at 3:42 PM, K. Peachey wrote:
> One of the major sticking points (that from my understanding is what
> the WMF people are hateing on) is the diff views in comparison of CR
> to Gerrit, For example we used to have them all display on one page
> where as with Gerrit you need to o
On Tue, Mar 6, 2012 at 12:59 PM, Daniel Barrett wrote:
> Since moving to MediaWiki 1.18, several of our extensions that use namespaces
> have broken in the following way. Any advice/explanation would be very much
> appreciated! (I don't see anything in the release notes.)
>
> Some of our extensi
On Mon, Mar 5, 2012 at 9:24 PM, K. Peachey wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 6, 2012 at 10:19 AM, Roan Kattouw wrote:
>> Well it's not *still* running, it's been broken plenty of times in the
>> meantime :)
>
>
> Wasn't that just the email address becoming unsub'
On Mon, Mar 5, 2012 at 1:09 PM, Tomasz Finc wrote:
> Given that i wrote it 4 years ago and haven't touched it since. I'm
> amazed that its still running ;)
>
Well it's not *still* running, it's been broken plenty of times in the
meantime :)
Roan
___
Wi
On Sat, Feb 25, 2012 at 1:20 AM, Antoine Musso wrote:
> Le 25/02/12 00:48, Platonides a écrit :
>
>> There's no way to treat a set of commits as a bundle?
>
>
> Not really. Each commit is considered by Gerrit as a new change. If you have
> a bundle of commits, you either:
>
> 1) squash them in a
On Thu, Feb 23, 2012 at 1:43 PM, Antoine Musso wrote:
> 2) newbie spamming gerrit
>
> This happen when you first play with Gerrit.
>
> In subversion world, whenever you submit a new patch (svn commit) it is
> going to be written down in the central repository. You will not be able to
> change it,
On Thu, Feb 23, 2012 at 1:38 PM, Platonides wrote:
> The parser cache expires much earlier in that case. Although we don't
> reduce it to lower than one hour due to the presence of such words.
>
> http://svn.wikimedia.org/viewvc/mediawiki/trunk/phase3/includes/MagicWord.php?view=markup#l134
>
This
On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 12:28 AM, Thomas Gries wrote:
> Basically:
> a link on a page like [[Benutzer:Alice]] is not necessarily the same as
> [[User:Alice]] (even when the latter exists).
>
> It depends on the current setting of
>
> $wgLanguageCode = "en" ;
> $wgLanguageCode = "de" ;
> (during te
On Sun, Feb 19, 2012 at 7:00 PM, reporter wrote:
> MediaWiki Bugzilla Report for February 13, 2012 - February 20, 2012
>
> Status changes this week
>
> Bugs NEW : 304
> Bugs ASSIGNED : 67
> Bugs REOPENED : 36
> Bugs RESOLVED : 428
>
304+67+36 < 428 . I'
On Sun, Feb 19, 2012 at 4:05 AM, Thomas Gries wrote:
> I suppose that the getNamespace fails in this case,
> Perhaps a patch in Linker.php is required to set Namespace already if
> the page is non-existent.
>
I don't think so. Even non-existent Title object must have their
namespace set. It's poss
On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 5:28 PM, Daniel Friesen
wrote:
> The idea that login is secure because it's on a separate page than the rest
> of the site is actually an old mistake.
> If a script is included ANYWHERE on the site on the same domain then it's
> possible to inject in some code that will fak
On Sat, Feb 18, 2012 at 2:47 AM, Andrew Otto wrote:
> 2. Do I need to rebase every time I push for review?
>
> I don't quite understand what is going on here. I've installed git-review
> and am using this to push to git. It does a rebase by default. I'm not sure
> if I should be turning that
On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 8:46 PM, Tomasz Finc wrote:
> Greetings all,
>
> I'm pleased to announce that the mobile team has a new team member.
> Jon Robson joins Yuvi, Patrick, Arthur, Phil, and Andre as a core
> member of the mobile team. In this role he'll provide the team with
> the strong front
On Sun, Feb 12, 2012 at 11:36 PM, Roan Kattouw wrote:
> LocalisationUpdate has SVN support built-in, but WMF stopped using
> that a long time ago due to performance issues. Instead, the wrapper
> script that we use to run the LU update on the cluster updates a local
> checkou
On Sun, Feb 12, 2012 at 7:40 AM, Rob Lanphier wrote:
>> Which reminds me, does LocalisationUpdate support git?
>
> Not yet:
> https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=34137
>
That bug is not about LocalisationUpdate. LU is not a TranslateWiki
tool, it's a WMF-side extension for pulling in up
On Sat, Feb 11, 2012 at 5:11 AM, Arthur Richards
wrote:
> The Wikimedia repository is used by others besides just fundraising,
> although the fundraising team is probably its heaviest user. I know that
> some folks from Wikimedia Sweden are using it, as is Ryan Faulkner for
> community analytics,
On Wed, Jan 25, 2012 at 7:35 AM, Rob Lanphier wrote:
> A couple of relevant bugs:
> Bug 33711 - mw.util.$content is undefined in MediaWiki:Common.js
> https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=33711
>
> Bug 33746 - Resource Loader should pre-depend on mw.util
> https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/
On Wed, Feb 8, 2012 at 11:42 PM, Tim Starling wrote:
> What are the other problems?
>
I'm not sure what Max is referring to, other than the fact that I hate
XML (or at least using XML for this API) and generally don't like the
fact that we have to support so many formats. As I said on Bugzilla
ear
On Thu, Feb 9, 2012 at 12:01 AM, bawolff wrote:
> If json becomes the new recommended format, does that mean that not
> passing a format parameter would result in jsonfm instead of xmlfm?
> (Probably not since the jsonfm pretty printer isn't all that pretty at
> the moment).
>
One major problem is
On Thu, Oct 13, 2011 at 9:55 PM, Roan Kattouw wrote:
>> Our MediaWiki 1.17.0 site recently installed a bunch of extensions that use
>> ResourceLoader, such as Extension:WikiEditor. To our surprise, some of our
>> site's unrelated CSS styles stopped working. Thi
On Wed, Feb 8, 2012 at 9:17 PM, Rob Lanphier wrote:
> We're migrating to Git very soon after this release. It would really
> suck to have a huge pile of unreviewed commits going into trunk. So,
> I'm going to suggest a Git migration strategy that will avoid having a
> monsterous backlog. Instea
On Wed, Feb 1, 2012 at 6:49 PM, Ryan Lane wrote:
> I still haven't gotten a chance to get to it. There's more involved
> than simply sanitizing the files. There's also some puppet work
> involved in this, and it isn't really simple to do right. I'll try to
> do it on the plane ride to FOSDEM.
>
I
On Wed, Feb 1, 2012 at 3:59 PM, Petr Bena wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> I requested a configuration file for squid weeks ago, but it seems to be a
> bit complicated to remove confidential data from it. I suppose we should
> split it to multiple files, having some public and private, and keep the
> public
On Wed, Feb 1, 2012 at 5:51 AM, Freek Dijkstra wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I've created a copy of the Vector skin.
> What is the recommended way to register resources (for the resource
> loader) for a custom skin?
>
> Vector registers the resources in resources/Resources.php
>
This is not really well tho
On Tue, Jan 31, 2012 at 6:10 PM, Neil Kandalgaonkar wrote:
> On 1/31/12 8:06 AM, Roan Kattouw wrote:
>> I hate having to continue
>> support for XML because it limits the keys you can use in all sorts of
>> ways.
>
> Right. I'm assuming here that the XML serialize
On Tue, Jan 31, 2012 at 6:09 PM, Daniel Friesen
wrote:
> On Tue, 31 Jan 2012 08:36:02 -0800, Tei wrote:
>
>> *Cough* some random article about making js that is not abusing the
>> slower parts of the language
>> http://www.bcherry.net/talks/js-better-faster *Cough*
>>
> Bah, that frankly looks w
On Tue, Jan 31, 2012 at 5:01 PM, Neil Kandalgaonkar wrote:
> Is it supposed to be possible to transmit arbitrary nested data
> structures in the API? Or do the format serializers make some
> assumptions that limit what we can do?
>
> I added a change yesterday which returns a complex parse tree vi
On Tue, Jan 31, 2012 at 2:18 PM, Markus Glaser wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I am trying to profile the JavaScript bit of an extension I maintain. Is
> there any recommended method similar to wfProfileIn/Out in MediaWiki? How do
> you do profiling on ResourceLoader?
>
There is no MediaWiki-side support f
On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 8:13 PM, Helder wrote:
> What about ptwikibooks' usage of
> https://pt.wikibooks.org/wiki/Template:Lista_de_capítulos/Posterior?action=edit
It looks like that finds the current page name in a list of pages,
then returns the next one in the list. I can see how that makes sen
On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 3:11 PM, Alex Brollo wrote:
> I'm using more and more #switch into templates, it's surprising how many
> issues it can solve, and how much large arrays it can manage. My questions
> are:
> 1. Is there a reasonable upper limit for the number of #switch options?
> 2. Is ther
On Thu, Jan 26, 2012 at 11:00 PM, Daniel Renfro wrote:
> I am working on an extension and would like to add some functionality to the
> 'usercontribs' api module (api/ApiQueryUserContributions.) I cannot subclass
> the ApiQueryUserContributions class and get the functionality I want because
> t
On Thu, Jan 26, 2012 at 10:29 PM, Max Semenik wrote:
> Does anyone mind if I create a magic word for current user's language?
> It will not fragment parser cache further than it is already because
> we already support {{int:}}. Note that this functionality is already
> emulatable with perversions
On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 4:46 AM, William Allen Simpson
wrote:
> I'm a Firefox HTTPS-Everywhere and NoScript kinda guy, and had no
> problems switching back and forth by turning scripts on and off.
> Both wikipedia and wikimedia js had to be turned on, though Why?
>
Probably because most of th
On Mon, Jan 16, 2012 at 7:22 PM, Jeroen De Dauw wrote:
> Hey,
>
> Do we trust that messages do not have evil (XSS) stuff in them? The reason
> why I ask is that I was just using .msg from mediawiki.jqueryMsg, and
> realized that things in the message do not get escaped. Since the function
> can ta
On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 7:20 AM, Dan Collins wrote:
> So, is anything interesting going to happen when Google suddenly
> realizes that all of our pages are nothing but a SOPA banner?
>
When the Italians did their blackout, Google asked us to block them
(!) from bits.wm.o (our JS/CSS domain), which
On 1/12/12, Tomasz Finc wrote:
> Greetings all,
>
> I'm pleased to announce that Andre Engles has decided to join the Mobile
> team as our data analyst contractor. In this role he'll provide the mobile
> team with key metrics to guide our software development efforts. He'll be
> working closely wi
On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 12:19 PM, Daniel Kinzler wrote:
> $.holdReady(true);
> mediaWiki.loader.load("https://toolserver.org/~netaction/wikitrust.js";);
>
> Note that this will disable all gadgets and custom scripts: $.holdReady(true)
> is
> a hack to prevent other user scripts from running. Th
On Wed, Jan 4, 2012 at 6:44 AM, John Vandenberg wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 4, 2012 at 10:51 AM, Platonides wrote:
>> Thanks Roan. It's also interesting to learn about that clause.
>
> I agree. I asked whether WMF had something like this
> http://lists.wikimedia.org/pipermail/foundation-l/2011-August/0
On Tue, Jan 3, 2012 at 11:49 PM, K. Peachey wrote:
> I'm pretty sure we can't assume anything with licensing, The uploader
> must state the license they want it to be under.
>
If something is uploaded by a WMF employee or contractor and was
produced in the course of their work for WMF, you can pro
101 - 200 of 898 matches
Mail list logo
